Below is the New York Bank Stock Index from 1929-1934.
- Japan
- Market Indicator
- Price Momentum Indicators
- Richard Russell
- Silver
- Speed Resistance Lines
- U.S. Dividend Watch List
Posted in 1929, bank stock
Below is the price change of Alaska Juneau Gold Mining (AJ) from 1918 to 1941.
Below is the price change for Alaska Juneau Gold Mining (AJ) from 1918 to 1968. Continue reading
Below are the Speed Resistance Lines for Microsoft (MSFT) from 1990 to 2002.
From 1993 to 2002, Microsoft experienced a similar parabolic peak to the 2009 to 2020 period. In that time, MSFT hit all of the downside targets that are generated by our Speed Resistance Lines.
Below we outline the Speed Resistance Lines for Microsoft from 2009 to 2020. Continue reading
On October 6, 2019, we presented the following on the Bloomberg Commodity Index (BCOM):
“The current level in the index, with the backdrop of the extended trading range from 2015, suggests that it would be very easy to see upside movement to the 141.58 target in a relatively short period of time (3-6 weeks). However, confirmation of the uptrend is needed before action can be taken. The confirmation is a break above the 124.15 target.”
The chart that we posted at the time is below:
Below is our update to the chart above, along with our tentative downside target which, based on precedent, is likely to be the next low for the index. Continue reading
In our posting of March 22, 2020, we said the following:
“Since the low in the stock market on March 9, 2009, Boeing (BA), (as of March 20, 2020) has gained approximately +206%. In the same period of time (March 9, 2009-March 20, 2020), the Dow Jones Industrial Average has increased +192%.”
If we were to match the performance of Boeing to that of the Dow Jones Industrial Average from the 2009 low to the April 3, 2020 close, Boeing would be trading at approximately $65.04. However, we already know that Boeing has been booking future sales to current earnings. This basically means that there were no earnings in the prior years.
The details of Boeing’s accounting is outlined in our March 23, 2020 posting titled “Boeing’s Accounting: Legal but Questionable.”
Numbers to Watch
As we continue to say, price reflects fundamental and fundamentals reflect price. In the chart below, which includes the last remaining downside targets, we have highlighted the fact that in the prior recessionary period from 1999 to 2002, Boeing reached a low of $25.06.
In the recovering from the low in 2002/2003, Boeing achieved a high of $107.23 and then fell to a low of $29.51. It is not necessary for Boeing to actually replicate the move of going back to the prior bear market low of 2002. However, we should not be surprised if Boeing were to go to the prior low of $29.51.
For the time being, we will attempt an unusual approach to using the Speed Resistance Lines. Typically, our downside targets are based on the most recent all-time high. In this case, that would mean basing the current downside targets on the $440.62 price. However, the current decline has been so disastrous that we’re going to utilized the 2015 peak price of $158.31 as the basis of our downside targets.
Below is the updated downside targets for Boeing (BA) based on the peak price that was set on February 20, 2015.
The downside targets based on the 2015 peak at $158.31 are:
Remember, the decline in Boeing started in early 2019. Additionally, Boeing began trading in a range starting in early 2018. For this reason, the idea of connecting the current decline with the coronavirus is generally a mistake.
That Boeing has managed to achieve the downside targets of a prior peak ($110.31) is astounding and speaks to the extreme low that it needs to achieve relative to the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
Summary
The current earnings were an illusion and should easily bring Boeing to $83.54, $65.04, $52.77, and possibly to $29.51.
Our New York Times Recession/Depression Index goes back to 1851 (found here). Is it any good? It is fairly reliable in indicating the end of the recession.
Below is the monthly New York Times Recession/Depression Index from January 2000 to April 2020.
The April 2020 numbers are only estimates. However, three days into the month and April is setting up to exceed the 2000 to 2002 period.
see also: August 2009: The Recession is Over
It was merely an observation at the time. However, we find it necessary to reprint a piece from 2015 on the outcome of falling oil prices and our thoughts about it at the time. Please click on the image or the following link: Consequences of Falling Oil Prices
Posted in Crude Oil, Dow Theory, Peso Crisis, Richard Russell, S&L Crisis, XOI
Below is the price chart of Dome Mines (DM) from 1918 to 1968. Continue reading
Posted in DM, Dome Mines, gold
From January 2020 to March 2020, we just experienced one of the worst quarters for equity investors, which prompts us to revisit the Coppock Curve. This indicator splits out buy indications with an extremely high success rate.
Below is a chart of the Coppock Curve from 1974 to the present and the statistical breakdown since 1930.
Below is the price chart of Union Pacific (UNP) from 1918 to 1968.
Note: We will be updating Alaska Juneau Gold Mining (AJ), Homestake Mining (HM), and Dome Mines (DM) from 1918 to 1968.
Below are the downside targets for Shopify (SHOP):
The history of parabolic increases suggests that Shopify’s mid-range target of $240.62 is not unusual and the extreme downside target is possible. We’ll update this chart upon request.
Posted in Edson Gould, SHOP, Speed Resistance Lines, SRL
On November 20, 2015, we posted the Speed Resistance Lines for Mercury General (MCY). The downside targets were:
The chart below highlights the date the SRL was published and the price action that has transpired since November 20, 2015.
Our lurking worry? That the $20.10 target will be achieved. This leads to a downside range of $18-$20 from the current price of $38.88.
Posted in downside, Edson Gould, MCY, Speed Resistance Lines, SRL
In terms of duration:
A bear market usually lasts ¼ to ⅓ of the preceding bull market. It’s just a rule of thumb but it will be clear why this is needed. Let’s look at the data, based on Charles H. Dow’s requirements, and arrive at potential durations for the current bear market.
The bull market of 2002 to 2007 had a bear market that was 28% (in time) of the trough to peak.
If this bull market began in 2009 and ended on February 2020 and matched the length of the 2002-2007 bear market then the presumed equivalent would bring the end of the bear market out to July 2022 (approximately).
However, let's assume that this bear market is going to last 14% of the 2009-2020 period (half of the 28%), then that would bring us out to April 2021 (approximately).
Being as conservative on the bear market scenario as possible, if this bear market lasts 7% of the 2009-2020 period, then that would bring us out to September 2020 (approximately).
On April 3, 2019, we said that the 2014-2016 period might have been a recession (as outlined in a major publication). If we took 25% of the period from the February 2016 low to the February 23, 2020 peak as a separate bull market then the current bear market would end in December 2020.
This is going to be a long year even under the best case scenario with a bear market that ends approximately September 2020. When we say it ends in September 2020, we mean that the price of major indexes decline below the lowest levels already reached on March 23, 2020.
Posted in bear market, Charles H. Dow, Duration