- Japan
- Market Indicator
- Price Momentum Indicators
- Richard Russell
- Silver
- Speed Resistance Lines
- U.S. Dividend Watch List
Transaction Alert
The NLO team executed the following transaction(s): Continue reading
Crash in Oil: Price Is Your Guide
On June 15, 2019, we published our Crude Oil Cyclical Trends (WTI). In that review, we said the following:
“Our assessment of the data, as is commonly the case, is to default to the most conservative scenario. In the case of the latest decline in the price of oil from June 27, 2018 to the present, we calculated the decline of -52.98% as a possible turning point for the price of oil. A decline to such a level would bring the price of oil to $36.40, an additional decline of -29.40%.”
As seen in the table that we provided at the time, there was precedent for the price of oil to decline to $22.71. We always start from the conservative view and that is why we utilized the -52.98% level as a target (the smallest decline for a full cycle). If we had applied the previous worst case scenario, we would have generated a decline in oil to $16.15.
As absurd as it sounds, oil stands at $14.62 and that is a rebound from a staggering low. Below, we project the upside resistance targets and provide strategies to employ if you must own oil related investments. Continue reading
U.S. Dividend Watch List: April 17, 2020
The bounce from the low was fast and furious and pushed many companies out of the 52 week low range. There are only a handful of companies this week but it’s worth revisiting companies on the April 3rd list as a good alternative.
Before we jump into this week’s list, let’s review the performance from last year. The best performing strategy was buying companies with low payout ratio. Two companies that came through was AmerisourceBergen (ABC) and Kroger (KR) both gaining more than 20%. Worse performing strategy was purchasing low P/E, a classic value investing strategy. Occidental Petroleum (OXY) and GAP (GPS) lost 78% and 68% respectively.
| April 19, 2019 | ||
| Strategy | High | Low |
| Yield | -26.6% | 1.6% |
| P/E | -0.7% | -36.2% |
| Payout Ratio | -1.9% | 6.6% |
| P/B | -10.6% | -26.1% |
| Closest to Low | -16.3% | |
| S&P 500 | -1.0% | |
| Dow Jones Ind | -8.7% | |
| Top 5 companies except for Index | ||
| Symbol | Name | Price | % Yr Low | P/E | EPS (ttm) | P/B | Yield | Payout Ratio |
| QNTO | Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc. | 10.08 | 3.92% | 8.1 | 1.24 | 0.7 | 3.6% | 29% |
| PRK | Park National Corp. | 73.31 | 7.05% | 11.7 | 6.29 | 1.2 | 5.6% | 65% |
| STBA | S&T BanCorp. | 26.03 | 9.42% | 9.2 | 2.83 | 0.9 | 4.3% | 40% |
| BEN | Franklin Resources | 16.34 | 9.59% | 6.5 | 2.51 | 0.8 | 6.6% | 43% |
Disclaimer On our current list, we excluded companies that have no earnings. Stocks that appear on our watch lists are not recommendations to buy. Instead, they are the starting point for doing your research and determining the best company to buy. Ideally, a stock that is purchased from this list is done after a considerable decline in the price and extensive due diligence. Our view is to embrace the worse case scenario prior to investing. It is important to place these companies on your own watch list so that when the opportunity arises, you can purchase them with a greater margin of safety. It is our expectation that, at the most, only 1/3 of the companies that are part of our list will outperform the market over a one-year period.
Posted in Dividend Achiever Watch List, Dividend Achievers, Dividend Watch List
Tagged members
W.P. Carey 10-Year Targets
Below are the valuation targets for W.P. Carey (WPC) for the next 10 years. See our partial January 3, 2019 posting for reference. Continue reading
Dow Jones REIT ETF Downside Targets
According to Charles H. Dow:
"The point of importance for those who deal in industrial stocks is whether the capitalization of the companies into which they propose to buy is moderate or excessive, when compared with the aggregate earnings of the various concerns forming the combination in a period of depression. It is probable that consolidated companies will be able to earn as much in the next period of low prices as the companies forming the combine were able to earn in the last one; hence the very foundation of investments in industrials should be knowledge of what these companies earned, say in 1893 to 1896, making, perhaps, reasonable allowance for economies under consolidation (Dow, Charles H. Review and Outlook. Wall Street Journal. April 27, 1899.)."
Dow’s point? To gauge the extent of a potential decline we need to consider the prior depressed levels as the benchmark for the next period of low prices and earnings.
How does this tie into the SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR)? Below are the Speed Resistance Lines for RWR in the period from 2001 to 2009.
The downside targets were:
-
$79.20 (conservative target)
-
$56.24 (mid-range target)
-
$33.29 (extreme target)
In the last period of decline, RWR achieved all of the downside targets. While achieving the extreme downside target of $33.29 is ideal, it isn’t the norm. For this reason, when the extreme downside target is achieved it stands out for what could happen in the next period of decline.
Below we provided the downside targets for the SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF based on the price action from 2009 to 2020. Continue reading
Boeing Upside Resistance Targets
Below are the upside resistance targets for Boeing (BA):
The upside resistance targets seem daunting. We’ve seen bigger and better companies bailed out and not able to recover from these levels. There is always a first.
Posted in BA, upside target
Palladium Achieves Target
On January 24, 2020, we said the following of Palladium:
“Because of the precedent set in the period from 1996 to 2001, we expect that the conservative downside target of $1,627.93 will be achieved.”
Below is the charting of our assessment and the subsequent price action.
Not only did palladium decline below the target of $1,627.93, the price of palladium fell to $1,370 on an intraday basis on March 19, 2020, almost exactly half the distance between the conservative and mid-range targets.
Posted in palladium
Palladium: Upside and Downside Targets
Below are the upside and downside targets for Palladium based on the February 27, 2020 peak. Continue reading
The History of REITs is MIA
While looking over the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) website (https://www.reit.com/) in search of a price index, we found this note about the history of U.S. REITs:
"U.S. REITs were established by Congress in 1960 to give all investors, especially small investors, access to income-producing real estate."
Considering that REITs started in 1960, we were expecting that there would be a price index that goes back to 1960 with a full list of the original members of that index. Strangely, the only price index that could be found begins in 1972. We thought that this is highly unusual, especially from the leading source for information on REITs. The thought becomes, why isn’t there a list of those REITs from the beginning? As the leading source for information on REITs, what are the challenges to providing this information?
Such history and component information can be found for most major indexes like the Dow Jones Industrial Average, Dow Jones Transportation Average, and Dow Jones Utility Average. In the case of the Dow Jones Industrial Average, the index is famously known to begin in 1896 for the Wall Street Journal. However, lesser known is the fact that the Dow's first index of stocks appeared in The Customer's Afternoon Letter in 1884 and consisted of eleven companies:
-
Chicago & North Western (merged with Union Pacific in 1995)
-
Delaware, Lackawanna & Western (merged with Erie Railroad in 1956)
-
Lake Shore (merged with New York Central in 1914)
-
New York Central (merged with Penn Central in 1968)
-
St. Paul (bankrupt in 1925)
-
Northern Pacific preferred (bankrupt in 1893)
-
Union Pacific (bankrupt in 1893)
-
Missouri Pacific (bankrupt in 1915)
-
Louisville & Nashville (merged to become CSX Transportation in 1986)
-
Pacific Mail (merged with Dollar Steamship Company in 1925)
-
Western Union (bankrupt in 1991)
Although there is a list of original members of the Dow Jones Industrial Average going back to the predecessor of the Wall Street Journal in 1884 with extensive history on those companies, there is no such detail from the NAREIT based on traded REITs from 1960.
While we’ve managed to compile a list of REITs from 1961 to 1991, below is the list of REITs that we could find for the period of 1961-1963 as provided by Norman E. Bailey’s paper titled “Real Estate Investment Trusts: An Appraisal.”
We would love to know if there is a full list of REITs from 1960 to 1972 with the price performance from the NAREIT. It would go a long way to improving the knowledge of REITs as investments if this data was made openly available.
When data from 1884 can be found with very little effort on the Dow Jones Industrial Average, what is the challenge of providing similar data from 1960?
see also: REIT Archives
source:
-
Bailey, Norman E. Real Estate Investment Trusts: An Appraisal. Financial Analysts Journal. May-June 1966. pages 107-114.
Berkshire Hathaway Hits Target
On February 22, 2019, we posted 10-Year price targets for Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-A). At the time, we had 2020 undervalued and extreme undervalue targets of $306,061 and $222,006, respectively.
Since that time, Berkshire Hathaway has had an intraday low of $239,440 on March 23, 2020.
The 2020 targets have been in place since our May 6, 2012 posting on Berkshire Hathaway.
see also: All 10-Year Targets
Posted in 10-year Targets, Altimeter, BRK-A, Target Achieved
ABM Achieves Target
On October 2, 2018, we posted 10-Year price targets for ABM Industries (ABM). At the time, we had undervalued and extreme undervalue targets of $25.12 and $17.06, respectively.
Since that time, ABM Industries has had an intraday low of $19.79 on March 24, 2020.
see also: All 10-Year Targets
Posted in 10-year Targets, ABM, Target Achieved
Starbucks Hits 2020 Target
On October 1, 2018, we posted 10-Year price targets for Starbucks (SBUX). At the time, we had undervalued and extreme undervalue targets for 2020 of $72.88 and $43.97, respectively.
Since that time, Starbucks has had an intra-day low of $50.02 on March 18, 2020.
see also: All 10-Year Targets
Posted in 10-year Targets, Altimeter, SBUX, Target Achieved