Category Archives: Yield Profile

Stock Market Dividend Yield: 1871-2020

This from Barron’s on the U.S. stock market dividend yield from 1871-1996:

image

The Dow Jones Industrial Average dividend yield profile from 1920-2020: Continue reading

Google: As If It Paid a Dividend

It should not go unnoticed that since the 2009 low, Alphabet (GOOG) and Microsoft (MSFT) have had essentially the same change in their stock price.  However, unlike GOOG, Microsoft has paid a dividend the whole time that GOOG has been publicly traded.  This means that Microsoft has been crushing it in the department of total returns.

Percentage change without dividends since March 9, 2009:

  • MSFT: +1,056%
  • GOOG: +808%

Percentage change with dividends since March 9, 2009:

  • MSFT: +1,397%
  • GOOG: +808%

image

Though they don’t directly compete on all levels, GOOG appears to be the superior more formidable upstart, by comparison.  Which begs the question, what would the valuation levels for GOOG have been if they paid the same dividend as Microsoft since going public?

Below we explore the levels that GOOG would be considered undervalued or overvalued if it paid exactly the same dividend as Microsoft from 2004 to 2020.

Altimeter

The Altimeter is a calculation of price relative to dividends.  It is very consistent over time although less so with high tech companies.  For this reason, a tech stock can and does exceed the overvalued targets but is reined in with dramatic declines in short periods of time.

image

Undervalued and overvalued levels based on Altimeter since 2004 are reflected in the chart below.

image

According to the Altimeter, as devised by Edson Gould, GOOG is at or near the overvalued range and should not be acquired at the current prices.

Dividend Yield Profile

All dividend paying companies traded in a historical range from undervalued to overvalued and then back to undervalued.

If GOOG paid a dividend that was based on what MSFT had paid since 2004, then GOOG would have an overvalued dividend yield of 0.14% and an undervalued yield of 0.29%.

So far, GOOG is trading near the higher end of the presumed yield range.  That doesn’t mean that GOOG is a sell, it just means that the stock isn’t a buy at the current price.

image

The question is, if GOOG isn’t undervalued, at what price would Alphabet be at if it were yielding a presumed 0.29%?  Below we have the expected price targets for Google over the next ten years based on the Altimeter.  We’ve chosen the Altimeter because it is so closely aligned with the dividend yield profile.

image

Conclusions

Alphabet has passed the phase of being the scrappy upstart ready to topple the Microsoft empire.  Instead, it is a shared world of domination for both companies.

Eventually, GOOG is going to start paying a dividend.  Initially, the dividend will be low on a yield basis but the rate of increases will be exceptional on a year-over-year basis. GOOG will be paying a dividend that is in line with the dividend that is currently paid by Microsoft.

For this reason, we don’t believe that the use of Microsoft’s dividend history applied to Google is such a far out concept.  Especially when GOOG has had difficulty in beating the price performance of MSFT since the 2009 low.

see also:

DJIA Yield Profile: 1948-2043

In a July 1999 issue of Investment Quality Trends published by Geraldine Weiss, it was observed that a dynamic shift in the history of the Dow Jones Industrial Average may have been in the process.  Weiss said the following:

“For more than 100 years, the benchmarks of value for the Dow Jones Industrial Average have been 3.0% at Overvalue and 6.0% at Undervalue.  Now, the venerable D.J.I.A. has climbed so extremely high, it’s dividend yield has dropped to 1.5%…the lowest in history.  The situation intrigues us and causes us to wonder if the Dow is establishing a new profile of value between dividend yield extremes of 1.5% at Overvalued (where stocks should be sold) and 3.0% at the former Overvalued level (where stocks can be bought).  Throughout history, there has been a 100% differential between the high and low dividend yields at historical extremes.  The D.J.I.A. now is 100% above its historic benchmark of Overvalue.

“If in fact the profile of value has changed from the Dow Jones Industrial Average (time will tell), then it is reasonable to assume that some blue chip stocks which also have climbed far beyond their historic levels of Overvalue, may be experiencing a similar fundamental change in their profiles of value.  We saw the other side of the coin in 1982, when interest rates rose to unprecedented levels and some interest rate sensitive stocks established extremes of high yield at Undervalue. (Weiss, Geraldine.  Should Some Overvalued Stocks Be Re-Evaluated? Investment Quality Trends. Mid-July 1999. page 12.).”

image

1983-2010

Our updated dividend yield profile for the Dow Jones Industrial Average since Weiss’ 1999 observation is below:

image

We’ve included the old high yield of 6% and old low yield of 3% with the new 1.50% overvalued level for contrast.

Because the March 2009 low fell short of the 6% dividend yield on the Dow Jones Industrial Average, many market analysts were not willing to accept the fact that the market would turn to the upside.  They waited and waited with the view that the rebound was a Fed induced rise rather than a fundamentals and values based increase.  Those same analyst were forces to wait out the most hated bull market in history, claiming a crash was coming for over 10 years.

1983-2043 Continue reading