Below is the annual 52-week low for Consolidated Edison (ED) from 1958 to 1968. We’ve also included the 3-month Treasury Bill as a comparison to show how utility stocks perform against the backdrop of rising interest rates.
In this example, the 3-month Treasury Bill increased from 1.77% to 4.31%. Meanwhile, Consolidated Edison (ED) had a 52-week low range from $22.00 to $30.63.
Posted in 1958-1968, Chart of the Day, Consolidated Edison, ED, interest rates
Below is the annual 52-week low for Montana Power (MTP) from 1958 to 1968. We’ve also included the 3-month Treasury Bill as a comparison to show how utility stocks perform against the backdrop of rising interest rates.
In this example, the 3-month Treasury Bill increased from 1.77% to 4.31%. Meanwhile, Montana Power (MTP) had a 52-week low range from $15.00 to $26.38.
Posted in 1958-1968, Chart of the Day, interest rates, Montana Power
Below is the annual 52-week low for Consolidated Edison (ED) from 1958 to 1967. We’ve also included the 3-month Treasury Bill as a comparison to show how utility stocks perform against the backdrop of rising interest rates.
In this example, the 3-month Treasury Bill increased from 1.77% to 4.31%. Meanwhile, Consolidated Edison (ED) had a 52-week low range from $22.00 to $30.63.
Below is the annual 52-week low for Florida Power Corp. from 1958 to 1968. We’ve also included the Effective Fed Funds Rate as a comparison to show how utility stocks perform against the backdrop of rising interest rates.
In this example, the Effective Fed Funds Rate increased from 2.42% to 6.02%. Meanwhile, Florida Power Corp. had a 52-week low range from $19 to $36.75.
Posted in 1958-1968, Chart of the Day, interest rates
Below is the annual 52-week low for Dome Mines (DM) from 1960 to 1968. We’ve also included the Effective Fed Funds Rate as a comparison to show how gold mining stocks perform against the backdrop of rising interest rates.
In this example, the Effective Fed Funds Rate increased from 1.98% to 6.02%. Meanwhile, Dome Mines (DM) had a 52-week low range from $17.12 to $46.25.
Posted in 1958-1968, Chart of the Day, Dome Mines, gold, interest rates
Below is the annual 52-week low for American Electric Power (AEP) from 1958 to 1968. We’ve also included the Effective Fed Funds Rate as a comparison to show how utility stocks perform against the backdrop of rising interest rates.
In this example, the Effective Fed Funds Rate increased from 2.42% to 6.02%. Meanwhile, American Electric Power (AEP) had a 52-week low range from $17.75 to $32.50.
Posted in 1958-1968, AEP, Chart of the Day, interest rates
Below is the annual 52-week low for Campbell Red Lake Mines (CRK) from 1960 to 1968. We’ve also included the Effective Fed Funds Rate as a comparison to show how gold mining stocks perform against the backdrop of rising interest rates.
In this example, the Effective Fed Funds Rate increased from 1.98% to 6.02%. Meanwhile, Campbell Red Lake Mines (CRK) had a 52-week low range from $9.63 to $24.00.
Below is a chart of inverted yields of American bonds as published in Richard Russell’s Dow Theory Letters on May 25, 1965. What is most conspicuous about this chart? The overall trend of lower highs (yields) and lower lows (yields).
Below is a chart of the Discount Rate from 1928 to 1943. The point of this chart is to show that the restrictive rate policy from 1928 to 1929 saw the stock market and economy increase significantly. Meanwhile, the easy money policy period from 1929 to 1943 were the most devastating for the U.S. economy and stock market.
This is an ironic twist on the idea that if the Federal Reserve lowers interest rates then that should explain why the U.S. economy improved from 2009 to 2019. Interest rate policy and the Fed’s role is not the reason the economy turns around. This explains why Japan has not recovered from the 1990 bust as outlined in our article “The ‘Even Greater’ Depression of 1990 to 2019.”
Posted in 1928, 1943, Chart of the Day, discount rate, interest rates
As the saying goes, “it is a recession when it happens to others and a depression when it happens to you.”
In the last “Great” Depression from 1929 to 1945, Americans were well aware of the pain and misery that was wrought on the nation. There are even some who wrongly claim that the only reason the United States got out of the “Great” Depression was World War II. Debates aside, below is a percentage change chart of the Dow Jones Industrial Average from 1929 to 1954, the period of time that it took for the index to get back to “break even.”
There is no debate among the average American or Harvard economist about when the last “Great” Depression occurred in the United States. However, when the exact same thing happens to one of our allies, it seem difficult for even the most esteem experts on the “Great” Depression to recognize the current depression simply because it isn’t happening to us.
That ally is Japan. To put our claim in context, we will show you the stock market of Japan as represented by the Nikkei 225 Index in exactly the same format as the Dow Jones Industrial Average above.
Someone please tell us that what Japan is going through isn’t a depression. We use the stock market as the most accurate real-time reflection of the economy, politics, and social well being, which is nothing new to long-time readers of our work.
Let’s reflect for a moment, in Japan from 1989 to 2008:
How is it possible, that a key measure of the health of a nation like Japan could suffer so much and not be recognized to be in an “Even Greater” Depression?
Look at the Dow Jones Industrial Average from 1929 to 1954 again. It took 25 years for the index to break even. Now look at the Nikkei 225 Index, it has already been 29 years and the index is still –40% below the prior peak.
Let’s take a brief refresher course on what was said of Japan prior to the decline of 1990, this from the Dow Theory Letters as published by Richard Russell and dated May 12, 1989:
Or how about the following, dated October 18, 1989:
And this from November 29, 1989:
And finally, this from April 5, 1989:
It is not an uniquely American attribute to forget the past but to blithely walk past the “Even Greater” Depression within our midst while it impacts our ally is a brewing storm.
Investors, politicians, and citizens alike would do well to note the exact same (subtle and not so subtle) slights and invectives being lobbed around today. Meanwhile, due diligence is necessary to first acknowledge the plight of an ally and act in the interest of both nations before it is too late.
Posted in 1929, DJIA, interest rates, Japan, Nikkei, QE, Quantative Easing
There is a contingent of analysts and economists who stand in the way of progress in economic and financial understanding of how stock markets work. One prevailing view is that the rise of interest rates is followed by a decline in the stock market. Worse still, there is the belief that reducing interest rates is the Federal Reserve’s primary tool for dealing with slowing economic growth.
Below, we show how, in spite of a cyclical increase of the Federal Reserve’s discount rate, from early 1925 to mid-1929, the stock market defied modern analysts and economists claims.
In the period from 1925 to 1929, the Federal Reserve embarked in a policy of increasing the discount rate. Below is the performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average and Dow Jones Transportation Average in the period from 1925 to 1929.
As we all know, the period that followed the peak in stock market in 1929 was declining interest rates and a subsequent stock market decline of nearly –90%.
Were we biased in our selection of the data? Absolutely! We chose the cyclical (short-term) period for one of the most notorious stock market rises and declines and added the cyclical period of rising interest rates to prove a point.
However, if you want to see how the stock market did during a secular (long-term) period of rising interest rates then see our posting titled “The False Narrative of Stocks and Interest Rates” published on January 7, 2019.
sources:
Below are the downside targets for the 3-month Treasury from the beginning of the Fed’s interest rate increasing campaign. Continue reading
Posted in Interest Rate Monitor, interest rates
The good news about the Dow Jones Industrial Average is that it has been around for the last two secular periods of rising interest rates. The first period is from 1898 to 1925 (27 years) and the second period is from 1942 to 1981 (26 years). In this posting, we show how the crowd that claims rate increases are the death of stocks is false.
The False Narrative
The false narrative is as follows, “…the reason for the wealth creation in the U.S. since 2009 is due to the decline in interest rates. Therefore, when interest rates start to increase there will be a crash in stock prices.”
The Facts
Let us review the performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average from 1896 to 1925 within a secular trend of rising interest rates.
Let us review the performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average from 1942 to 1981, within the last secular trend of rising interest rates.
In both instances, within the entire period of rising interest rates/inflation, the Dow Jones Industrial Average increased significantly. Most interesting is the fact that the period from 1896 to 1925 had stocks offering substantial total returns due to lopsided par value stock and high dividend yields. This puts much of the gains not calculated in the Dow Jones Industrial Average in the pockets of investors and not the price of the index.
The False Narrative Crowd
It is very easy to make false claims. However, the data tells a completely different story. There will be stock market crashes in either secular trend in interest rates for various other reasons. Strictly because rates are rising isn’t necessarily one of them.
Posted in DJIA, false narrative, interest rates
On November 21, 2015, we said the following:
“While a Fed rate increase is what everyone is waiting for, history suggests that Fed policy (government regulated) follows short-term Treasuries (market driven).
“In a barely perceptible way, the chart above demonstrates that all Federal Reserve rate increases were preceded by a rise in the 3-month Treasury. The blue arrows indicate the reversal in the declining trend before 3-month Treasuries increased. From this point, we can easily see that the Federal Reserve’s discount rate follows to the upside not long after. We’ve only included the point in the interest rate cycle that corresponds to the phase that we are entering, coming from an all-time low to an eventual all-time high.”
We are clearly in the early stages of a secular rising trend in interest rates. As noted above, the direction is up for the foreseeable future. What concerns us now, as always, is the cyclical declines which can be dramatic. Below we trace out the first decline in the previous secular trend and see what that would look like in the current rate environment. Continue reading
On September 26, 2018, the Federal Reserve Bank increased interest rates.
How has this policy of rate increases affected the stock market? Since the first rate increase after the “financial crisis” on December 17, 2015, the Dow Jones Industrial Average has defied the scaremongers who assert that rising rates will crash the market.
The Dow is up +45% since the rate increasing policy began.
How is it possible that the Dow Jones Industrial Average is up so much in spite of eight consecutive rate increases? Why have the scaremongers been so wrong? Two key articles that we’ve written address this perplexing issue and anticipated much of what we’re seeing in the current rise of the market with rising interest rates.
The first article, published April 20, 2011 titled “The Myth of ‘Inflation Proof’ Stocks” highlighted the performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average from 1940 to 1966 while the 3-month Treasury increased from 0.01% to as high as 4.59%. In that period, the DJIA increased more than +900%.
The second article, published September 4, 2014 titled “Utility Stocks and Rising Interest Rates” flipped the script on the scaremongers by contrasting the performance of interest rate sensitive stocks against the backdrop of a rising rate environment. Like the Dow Jones Industrial Average, the Dow Jones Utility Average increased more than +500% in the period from 1939 to 1966. As a bonus, we included the earning and stock performance of seven regional utilities from 1949 to 1953.
Below is the 3-month Treasury and the upside resistance levels that we’re watching for a possible pullback from the rising trend. Continue reading
