Below are the valuation targets for Stock Yards Bancorp (SYBT) over the next 10 years. Continue reading
- Japan
- Market Indicator
- Price Momentum Indicators
- Richard Russell
- Silver
- Speed Resistance Lines
- U.S. Dividend Watch List
Below are the valuation targets for Stock Yards Bancorp (SYBT) over the next 10 years. Continue reading
Below is a chart of Southern Company (SO) from 1982 to 2019 reflecting the year-over-year (YoY) percentage change.
Below are the valuation targets for Southern Company (SO) for the next 10 years. Continue reading
Below is a chart of Dominion Energy (D) from 1981 to 2019 reflecting the year-over-year (YoY) percentage change.
Below are the valuation targets for Dominion Energy (D) over the next 10 years.
Below is a chart of the Dow Jones Industrial Average from 1901 to 2019 reflecting the year-over-year (YoY) percentage change.
Please email us at "nloteam at newlowobserver dot com" for an updated to this chart.
The NLO team executed the following transaction(s): Continue reading
Nordstrom (JWN), a major luxury retailer, has been struggling this year. The stock has fallen -27% and we would like to explore a technical pattern call the Golden Cross to see how well the indicator holds up with Nordstrom.
Here’s a general overview of the Golden Cross as defined by Investopedia.
The golden cross is a candlestick pattern that is a bullish signal in which a relatively short-term moving average crosses above a long-term moving average. The golden cross is a bullish breakout pattern formed from a crossover involving a security's short-term moving average breaking above its long-term moving average or resistance level.
In our observation, we’ve chosen to use the 50 day moving average as the short-term period and the 200 day moving average as the long-term period of review. Based on our data going back to 1982, this strategy has produced positive returns approximately 65% of the time, assuming we sell the stock within 253 trading days (or approximately 1 year) after the signal is triggered. The table below provides the details. Continue reading
History:
Revised GE Upside Targets
After demonstrating a history of consistency, in terms of the general trend in the stock price of General Electric, we must revise the Speed Resistance Lines that were issued in January 1, 2019 to more accurately reflect the changes that have occurred in the last 11 months.
The upside resistance targets are as follows:
It would be a major coup for the price of General Electric to exceed the conservative upside resistance target at $19.05. For now, we will reiterate that almost all stocks achieve the conservative targets through either the passage of time or increase/decrease in price.
As was said in January 2019, “GE could achieve all of the designated upside resistance targets and still be in a declining trend.”
Posted in Edson Gould, GE, General Electric, upside target
In our early October 2019 posting, we outlined the parameters for what we expected for the Hang Seng index. In spite of the recent increases, everything is lining up, so far. Continue reading
The NLO team executed the following transaction(s):
Previous Year Performance Review
In our ongoing review of the NLO Dividend Watch List, we have taken the top five stocks on our list from November 16, 2018 and have checked the performance one year later. The top five companies on that list can be seen in the table below
| Symbol | Name | 2018 Price | 2019 Price | % change |
| EV | Eaton Vance Corp. | 42.63 | 48.07 | 12.8% |
| PRGO | Perrigo Company plc | 63.27 | 49.38 | -22.0% |
| R | Ryder System, Inc. | 54.81 | 52.71 | -3.8% |
| CHFC | Chemical Financial Corp. | 47.05 | 42.04 | -10.6% |
| GS | Goldman Sachs Group | 202.12 | 220.25 | 9.0% |
| Average | -2.9% | |||
| DJI | Dow Jones Industrial | 25,413.22 | 28,004.89 | 10.2% |
| SPX | S&P 500 | 2,736.27 | 3,120.46 | 14.0% |
The biggest drag to the performance of the top five companies was Perrigo Company (PRGO) which lost -22% in one year. The stock was trading $63 during the same time last year but the market correction in December took the price down to $36.50, a -40% decline. Perrigo rebound to $50 range which is about 37% from the bottom.
A company we had interest in from last year's list was Ryder Systems (R). The price is virtually unchanged over the course of the last year. While the stock price didn't budge, the dividend did increase which increased the dividend yield from 3.7% to 4.3%. Our 10-year targets shows that Ryder Systems should be accumulated at this range so we urge our readers to consider this company at this juncture.
U.S. Dividend Watch List: November 15, 2019
The Industrial reached all-time high at 28,000 and the S&P 500 reached 3,120. The one missing piece for us is the Dow Jones Transportion Average which needs to exceed 11,570. With the market at its all-time high, it's expected that we will have fewer companies trading near their yearly low and that is exactly what we got. Below are the companies on our watch list this week. Continue reading
Posted in Dividend Achiever Watch List, Dividend Achievers, Dividend Watch List
Tagged members
Below is a chart of Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) from 2010 to 2019 reflecting the year-over-year (YoY) percentage change.
In the last 12 months, Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) has increased approximately +7%, on a YoY basis. Below is the history of returns when Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) has increased by +7% YoY levels since 2010 and the stock is held for a minimum of 3 years.
Following a similar increase of +7%, had Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) been acquired and held for at least 3 years, the average annualized return of 15% was achieved with a high level of probability.
We have to warn that the data being reviewed is strictly within a bull market that began in 2009 and has not been tested over periods of a full economic cycle. Therefore, we put particular emphasis on the downside risk being played out as reflected in our Speed Resistance Lines of November 15, 2019 and/or a general market decline of 20%-30% as a time that we’d take some interest in Anheuser-Busch InBev.
In our previous work, we have outlined the impact of dividends and the historical precedent related to the qualitative elements of Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD). Why have we put so much focus on ONLY one fundamental element as it relates to a stock and its future prospects. As stated by Geraldine Weiss in her book Dividends Don’t Lie:
“The philosophy that the dividend yield of a quality company can reveal volumes about a stock’s future performance does not lend itself merely to a certain tax climate or a particular market cycle. It is a basic principal. one that serves as a faithful guide through even the most confounding stock market phases (page 10).”
Many argue that such a narrow perspective on esoteric points regarding the dividend doesn’t tell the whole story. Our writing on this topic since calling the bull market in 2009, and starting this site, highlights the exceptional consistency of the perspective that we have offered.
Price Reveals Fundamentals, Fundamentals Reveal Price
According to Charles H. Dow, co-founder of the Wall Street Journal and creator of the indexes that bear his name:
"The one sure thing in speculation is that values determine prices in the long run. Manipulation is effective temporarily, but the investor establishes price in the end. The object of all speculation is to foresee coming changes in values. Whoever knows that the value of a stock has run ahead of price and is likely to be sustained can buy that stock with confidence that as its value is recognized by investors, the price will rise (Dow, Charles H. Review and Outlook. Wall Street Journal. February 25, 1902.)."
With this in mind, we will venture into the indication that are provided by the activity of the price for Anheuser-Busch InBev.
Downside Speed Resistance Lines
Below are the Downside Speed Resistance Lines (SRL) for Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) covering the period from July 2009 to November 2019.
The downside targets based on the data from 2009 to the present are:
We can see that BUD has managed to decline through the conservative and mid-range targets. All that remains is the extreme downside target of between $44.48 and $47.70. The lack of historical precedent does not allow for the richer analysis of the price that we’d normally like to do. Such analysis makes for what we believe would be better interpretation of the price activity.
Three Steps Rule
In addition to Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines, there is the theory of the Three Steps Rule. According to Gould:
Our Three Step Rule (not to be confused with our Three Step and Stumble Rule, Which refers only to monetary conditions) has been helpful over the years in our attempt to project stock market moves and to anticipate stock market tops and bottoms.
Our Three Step Rule says: In any stock market move, up or down, large or small or in between, expect three steps but be prepared for a fourth.
It applies to large moves as well as small moves.
Three steps up in an advancing market and three steps down in a declining market usually exhaust the bullish potential accumulated at the bottoms and the bearish potential accumulated at tops- but sometimes there is a fourth step (Edson Gould Reports. Edson Gould’s 1975 Forecast. November, 1974. page 8. ).
We have included, in the chart above, the Three Steps (red circles). In this case, the third “step” cannot occur unless it is at some point below the second “step.”
Upside Speed Resistance Lines
Below are the Upside Speed Resistance Lines (SRL) for Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) covering the period from September 2016 to November 2019.
The upside targets based on the data from 2016 to the present are:
As with downside prospects there must be upside resistance. From the all-time low set in late 2018, BUD has managed to climb as high as $101.58. However, not achieving the $111.00 upside resistance and then falling below the $99.44 upside resistance level suggests, at minimum, a re-test of the $65.43 level.
Speed Resistance Lines are based on the work of Edson Gould who was famous for precisely calling market tops and bottoms and widely quoted in Barron’s throughout the 1970’s. How powerful are the indications provided by Gould’s SRL?
Among the many posting we have on the topic, our April 26, 2012 on the downside risk for Chesapeake Energy (CHK) titled “A Warning for Chesapeake Shareholders” suggested that although the stock was trading at $18.10, CHK could potentially decline as low $0.67 as a normal reaction to the prior peak. On November 12, 2019, CHK had a closing price of $0.67.
Posted in BUD, Edson Gould, Speed Resistance Lines, SRL, three step rule
In the previous post dated November 13, 2019, we reviewed the year-over-year change in the annual dividend and contrasted that against the payout ratio for Anheuser-Busch (BUD). In this posting, we’re going to review the payout ratio for BUD since 1982 and contrast that to Edson Gould’s Altimeter.
The dividend payout ratio for BUD is a reflection of the amount of the annual dividend paid relative to the annual earnings. A payout ratio above 100% means the company is paying more in dividends than what is being earned. Alternatively, a dividend payout ratio at less than 50% generally means that the company is in a position to keep the dividend or potentially increase, based on business prospects.
Below is a charting of the dividend payout ratio as derived from Value Line Investment Survey and Barron’s from 1982 to 2019.
The period from the end of 2007 to the end of 2009 is when BUD was in transition to becoming part of InBev (previous symbol INB.Belgium).
Below is the charting of the Altimeter as outlined in the work of Edson Gould which is a relative comparison between the dividend and price and does a fantastic job of indicating when a stock is undervalued or overvalued.
Oddly enough, the beginning of the chart from 1982 to 1985 is very similar to the period from 2010 to 2018. In both cases, the Altimeter swings from a vast level overvaluation to more modest levels. However, as seen in the dividend payout ratio in the first chart, the significant difference is that BUD never exceeded the payout ratio of 50% from 1982 to 2007. Meanwhile, in the period from 2010 to the present, several years have been spent with the payout ratios exceeding 100%.
What is most important to look at in the Altimeter is the horizontal red line. That line indicates a tendency (1982-2007) for BUD be undervalued and bought without reservation. It should be noted that within the established historical range, InBev acquired BUD at the most expensive price relative to that period.
Unfortunately, since the acquisition by InBev, BUD needs at least a full economic cycle before investors can determine the range of valuations on a fundamental basis. The InBev era does not sufficiently equate to the period prior to 2007. So far, the analysis by Sean Walters in Barron’s, at the time of the acquisition, seemed accurate when he said:
“Yes, there is a positive correlation between brewers' size and profitability. But its limits might be tested by an InBev-Anheuser tie-up (Walters, Sean. Is a Bigger InBev Better?.Barron's. June 16, 2008. M7.).”
Our next review on BUD will look at what the price tells us regarding the short and medium-term prospects for the stock.
Posted in Altimeter, BUD, Payout Ratio Studies