Dogs of the Dow – A Review of the Past

What a year it was for the bull market in 2017, which naturally should have lifted all stocks and most asset classes. We've seen the rise in equities, real-estate, and new asset classes like crypto currencies. That being said, we'd take any opportunity to review strategies used in the market in an attempt to grow our assets. The start and end to the new year is a perfect stop to revisit a strategy known as the Dogs of the Dow.

In this piece, we're going to review the 2017 performance of the Dogs of the Dow and look back to the period of 1996 to 2017.

2017 Dogs of the Dow Performance Review

The purpose of any investment strategy is to exceed the performance of the stock market averages.  In the year 2017, the Dow Jones Industrial Average gained +25.10%.  The Dogs of the Dow, the 10 highest yielding stocks, gained +19.45%.

Knowing us, we can't leave well enough alone.  We asked ourselves, how good is the highest dividend yield performance?  To answer that question, we applied Charlie Munger's rule of "always invert" when confronted with a difficult question.  So we ran the performance numbers of the 10 lowest dividend yielding stocks.  One thing led to the another and we ended up with the following results.

Below is the performance table of the various fundamental attributes that we followed for the top 10 and top 3 ranked Dow stocks.  As you can see, the top 10 low yielding stocks gained +27.33%, exceeding the top 10 high yielding stocks by 7.88%.  More astoundingly, if you bought the top 3 low yielding stocks, you would have beat the top three high yielding stocks by +19.52%.

Looking at the performance of 2017, it could naturally be said that maybe the last year was a fluke.  However, when looking at the average performance of the same categories since 1996, we find that the high yielding stocks managed to get beat out by the low yielding stocks, easily.

Of all the categories since 1996, the Dogs of the Dow (top ten highest yielding)  was the worst performing metric by which to attempt to beat the Dow Jones Industrial Average.  The two metrics that have beat the Dow over the period from 1996 to 2017 are the improbable high p/e and high p/b.  We can't give an explanation for why these two approaches managed to do so well.

As a footnote to the last chart, to beat the Dow Jones Industrial Average by buying only the top three stocks, the best performers were (in descending order) high p/e, low yield and then the Dogs of the Dow. For some reason, the high p/e stocks beat the Dow in either the top ten or top three category.

Stock Market and Inflation Risk

A reader of our Dow 130k article has raised an important question about the risks that the stock market faces when confronted with the prospect of rising interest rates.  The reader says, in part:

“…they say that interest rates are mean reverting and based on where we are today (historically low) I would think that the betting man would bet that it can only go up from here.  If that is the case, I can't see a bull market in the coming years.

“What if the scenario is that we have permanent low inflation (Secular stagnation). Productivity improvements through outsourcing and technology innovation may explain this paradigm shift.”

We don’t have much to go by other than the historical record.  In this case, the historical record says the following:

  • Interest rates will go up
  • Inflation is broadly bullish for the stock market
  • the period of “low inflation” is behind us

In this article, we will examine, from a historical perspective, whether this is a new era where all of our claims are false or history will repeat.

Continue reading

Dow 130,000 by 2032

Summary

  • In 1999, Warren Buffett said that stock market returns would underperform over the next 17 years.
  • Cycles indicate that the next 17 years will be a secular bull market.
  • Volume data and price recovery were the keys to the change in the trend.
  • Magnitude of secular trends in the past point to 10-fold gains in DJIA.
  • The work of Edson Gould in 1935, 1979 and today.
  • Look for average real compounded annual returns of +12% v. the historical +7% real returns.

U.S Dividend Watch List: December 29, 2017

Another year is in the book and it ended on the high note. The S&P 500 rose 20% and Dow Jones Industrial Average gained an astonishing 25% for the year. This bull market is relentless and shows no sign of slowing down going into 2018. The good news for us and most investors are that being long the market is an easy bet. The toughest part, at least for us, is to fine new investment as small amount of companies trade near the yearly low. However, utilizing the list below, we believe, will give us the best chance of succeeding in the long term.

Continue reading

Insurance Watch List: December 2017

Below is our year-end review of the insurance stocks with a market capitalization of $1 billion or more. 

Berkshire Hathaway has been given special consideration in a single post dated December 19, 2017 with our 2018 fair value, overvalued, and undervalued targets which have been achieved every year since 2012.

Gold Stock Indicator: December 2017

Below is the updated Gold Stock Indicator as of December 28, 2017:

Oil and Gas Stock Index: December 2017

On January 6, 2015, when the Oil and Gas Stock Index (XOI) was trading at 1,269.40, we said the following:

“…we expect the XOI index could easily fall to 1,015.10 and subsequently to the 812.08.  Those interested in the oil sector should start initiating positions at or below the ascending 1,015.10 level.”

The 812.08 would have represented a decline of –52.95% from the 2014 peak.  Instead of declining to 812.08, the XOI declined to 900.52, a decline of –47.83%. We were off by 5.12% in our projection of the downside.  However, our advice on the initiation of positions below the 1,015.10 has provided considerable investment gains.  Below is our update on the direction of the XOI.

Bitcoin December 2017: Downside Targets

“A mob’s a monster; heads enough, but no brains.” –Benjamin Franklin

Homebuilder Confidence at 18 Year High

In an articled titled “America's homebuilders haven't felt this good since 1999” found on Yahoo!Finance dated December 18, 2017, it is noted that homebuilders confidence is “…now at a higher level than it was at any point during the housing bubble.”  Does this mean that a crash in the housing market is coming?

image

To clarify whether a crash is coming, we’ve taken the data that is referenced in the article and laid bare the elements of a real estate market cycle.  In the article it is said that the National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index (HMI) “…hit an 18-year high of 74, topping expectations for a reading of 70 and well above last month’s reading of 69.”

As we’ve pointed out, based on the work of Roy Wenzlick, there is an approximate 18-year real estate cycle for peaks and troughs.  When we look at the HMI chart (full cycle in red), we can clearly see that major cycle lows have an 18 year period of separation.  While this is only a coincidence, it fits well with the work of Wenzlick who confidently shows this cycle (1795-1974) in his writings from 1930-1974.

Continue reading

Berkshire Hathaway 2018 Targets

On February 5, 2017, we said the following of Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-A) when the stock was trading at $245,646:

“The upside target to fair value is at $287,172.61, be on the lookout for this as the possible upside target for BRK-A in 2017.”

Berkshire Hathaway achieved the upside fair value target on November 30, 2017 and now trades at $297,740.  Although the gain has been only +21.20%, there is a high level of predictability in the price action of the stock.  Below we outline the overvalued, fair value and undervalued targets of BRK-A for 2018 based on the Altimeter.

Bull Market Ranking

Since January 2011, we have advocated against the claim that the Federal Reserve was responsible for the rise in the stock market.  Our theory has always been based on the precedent of stock market data which can be traced to periods in American history when there was no central bank.

In February 2014, we compiled enough of the necessary stock market data to show that:

“The most important concept that should be taken away from all this data is that a central bank did not exist from 1836-1914. There was no way to ascribe the gains of the market to the Federal Reserve. All iterations of a central bank with the First Bank of the United States (1791-1811) and the Second Bank of the United States (1816-1836) did not have any effect on the data sets that we have provided from the period of 1836 to 1914. In order for the claim that the current market run is based on the monetary policies of the Federal Reserve, we’d need to be able to demonstrate that the stock market would have behaved differently without the existence of a Federal Reserve (February 17, 2014).”

In that same February 2014 posting, we listed the market percentage gains that were experienced when there was no central bank in place.  We averaged the gains in the seven market cycles while having no Federal Reserve and showed that the average gain would have brought the Dow Jones Industrial Average to 17,500.  However, as time has passed and the Dow has increased, we’ve shown what the next level the Dow would need to go to in order to exceed the next highest bull market (on a percentage basis).  In November 2014, we said:

“If the Dow were to go to the extreme of rebounds with no Fed (1857-1864), then in theory the index could climb as high as 24,840 (November 2014).”

On December 18, 2017, the Dow Jones Industrial Average increased to the 24,840 level on an intraday basis. The gain from the 6,450 level is approximately +285.11%.  We think that the stock market’s ability to rise to the current level has been more about confidence in the economy and less about actions taken by the Federal Reserve.  Below we show the ranking of the current bull market to put the market action into perspective.

2017 NLO Book List

Below are the books that we’ve read cover-to-cover in 2017.  The accompanying links will take you to Amazon.com if you’re interested in buying the books.  Don’t forget to check out our 2016 book list.

The top three must read books from the latest list are:

See the updated book list below:

Continue reading

Craft Brew Alliance: Ebb and Flow

On September 1, 2016, Craft Brew Alliance was trading at $19.41, we said the following:

“…we have the following downside targets:

  • conservative: $12.57
  • mid-range: $10.02
  • extreme: $7.47

Although there is no assurance that the stock needs to decline to the referenced downside targets, any parabolic move must be watch closely as entropy will kick in at some point.  In this case, we believe that the ascending conservative target is a lock.”

Since September 1, 2016, BREW declined as much as –38% to the $12 level on April 18, 2017, on an intraday basis.  On April 7, 2017, we said the following:

“We don’t necessarily believe it but here we are, with BREW at a price of $13.15 and well within the range of the conservative downside target set at $12.57”"…”

Since April 7, 2017, BREW has increased by as much as +46%.  Anyone contemplating a purchase of BREW, barring a takeover by another company, should consider the exceptional increase in 8 months as a warning to protects your profits.

Below we have charted the price action for BREW and suggest that if the 2016 peak is not exceeded then the April 2017 lows will be retested and possibly violated by as much as –24% or falling to as low as $9.31.

Commodity Index Review: December 2017

In February 2017, we said the following:

“For now, we have to see if the retest of the 82.10 holds while exceed[ing] the 89.93 bodes well for the commodity sector in general.”

Dogs of the TSX 60

Below is our outline of the stocks that are part of the Toronto Stock Exchange TSX 60 and the rudimentary strategy of selecting the stocks based on the Dogs of the Dow investment approach.