Payout Ratio Studies: Procter & Gamble

It has been our observation that a company with a history of dividend increases over a full economic cycle (ideally more) will exhibit a characteristic of being especially undervalued when the stock has a high dividend payout ratio.  In this posting, we’ll show how a well established company like Procter & Gamble (PG) can generate a high dividend payout ratio and exceptional total returns compared to low dividend payout ratios and mediocre investment returns.

Mercury General: Targets and Perspective

On August 14, 2012, when Mercury General (MCY) was trading at a price of $37.30, we said the following:

According to Morningstar.com, MCY is considered a “buy” at $31 and at fair value at $45.  Our own model suggests that MCY is significantly undervalued at $39 and a “buy” at $45. Investment Quality Trends (www.iqtrends.com) indicates that when MCY is at a yield of 4.5% or higher, the stock should be considered for purchase.  Currently, MCY has a dividend yield of approximately 6.60%.  Keep in mind that we do not buy stocks for their dividend yield.  Instead, we use the company’s consistently increasing dividend as the only proof that the company management can:

  • increase earnings over time
  • reward current shareholders

Since that time, we’ve seen Mercury General increase from $37.30 to as high as $64.52.  Along with the increase in price, we’ve been forced to revise our perspective on the stock.  Below, we will outline the revisions to our perspective and provide target prices we think MCY should be considered for acquisition.

Review: Western Digital SRL

On November 25, 2015, we posted the following SRL for Western Digital (WDC):

image

Implied in the posting is that WDC would decline, at minimum, to the $49.70 level with the potential of going all the way to the $37.45 level.  Falling below the extreme downside target ($37.45) is where we always recommended consideration of the fundamentals of a stock for a potential purchase. Below is the updated price action for WDC.

image

Much of the price action of WDC has conformed to the SRL which, from our experience, has been amazing in calling downside targets.  The current price action suggests considerable weakness in the stock if WDC cannot maintain the ascending $61.16 level.

Goldman Plays with Numbers

On MarketWatch.com we saw the following article:

image

In the article, it quotes Goldman Sachs analysts as saying, “We also believe that cryptocurrencies have moved beyond bubble levels in financial markets, and even beyond the levels seen during the Dutch ‘tulipmania’ between 1634 and early 1637.”

In addition to concerns about bitcoin, the article highlights cool charts that compare Ether to previous bubbles, as seen below.

image

We thought, if Goldman Sachs can play with numbers then why can’t we?  So we decided to pit the price rise in Bitcoin from April 23, 2011 to April 9, 2013 with the price rise in Ethereum from January 11, 2017 to January 24, 2018.  We just wanted to see the two periods back to back.

image

Playing with the numbers is fun because we picked a period that Goldman has chosen to overlook to compare Ethereum to.  It turns out, if you don’t know the history of Bitcoin and other relevant bubbles, then you’ll miss the last time they probably got it wrong.  The importance of this chart is that perspective matters.

We know that the bubble will bust at some point, the purpose of this piece is to demonstrate that what isn’t shown can be as important as what is shown.

Housing Prices About to Explode Higher?

This was the headline found on ValueWalk.com.

image

If you like a rationale for what might happen in housing then this is a pretty good explanation.  However, we’ve long stated this fact.  Based on the data that we track, all indications pointed to the coming boom in housing and real estate prices since our December 9, 2010 article titled “Real Estate: The Verdict is In.”

image

The above chart is from our October 2017 Real Estate Review, in which we said the following:

“Although we show the cycle at or near a ‘peak,’ the current stage is a phase of accelerated increases on the way to a top in the real estate market at or near the 2024 date.”

This mirrors the ValueWalk article which states, “The valuable part of this chart is the right side which shows that millennials are starting to buy homes now and should boost the housing market until 2026.” However, our estimate for the peak near 2024 was first issued on October 5, 2012 based on the work of Roy Wenzlick and was a revision to our initial 2028 estimate.

There are some factors that go unaddressed in the ValueWalk article however, we believe, as we’ve stated since December 2010, that the trend is your friend.

Dow Altimeter Review

On October 25, 2017, we said of the Dow Jones Industrial Average Altimeter:

“How in the world do we believe that an already ‘overvalued’ market can possibly go as high as 34,885?  We don’t believe it at all, instead, we’re going by the precedent of the extensive history of the stock market in the United States.”

So far, the Dow has exceed the percentage increase of the 1852 low of +284% when it went above 24,844.60 level.  Now, the Altimeter is pointing to the next upside target of least resistance en route to the 34,885 level.

Interest Rate Monitor: January 2018

So what is the pattern to the Federal Reserve’s interest rate increases since December 2015?  Quite laughably, we think we have a clue.  Let’s see how this works with our ability to predict the next increase.

DJIA Update: January 2018

Below is the performance of the individual Dow Jones Industrial Average constituents from December 29, 2017 to January 19, 2018.

image

Our breakdown of the top three stocks in the respective fundamental categories is illuminating in spite of the short time under review.

Continue reading

The Rise and Fall of GE

General Electric (GE) appears to be spiraling into oblivion.  As we’ve suggested last year, we think that GE is going to be booted from the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA).  In this article, we’ll take a look at how GE got to this point and what might be in store for the stock price going forward.

1975-1981

It is possible that the beginning of the end for GE could have been marked by the acquisition of Utah International on December 16, 1976, in a deal that was dubbed “one of the largest acquisition proposals in the nation’s history.”  That transaction set in motion the machinations of a complex set of accounting deals and dealings from which GE never seemed to extract itself from.

In the bid to acquire Utah International, General Electric, “…was able to use the pooling method [of accounting] to help boost its profits…” For GE, the “…unrecorded asset value would be reported as a gain…” when the eventual sale of those assets came due.  Another benefit for GE would be that “…even if the assets were not later sold, their below market valuation allowed GE to understate its expenses (cost of sales and depreciation) and thereby overstate net income.”  The problem with these methods of accounting slight-of-hand is that GE would not be able to wean itself from these strategies.  In fact, this approach to acquisition and growth only increases as time went on.

Alarmingly, the acquisition of Utah International came after GE had exited the computer business.  As noted at the time, “the computer business proved too much for Fred Borch [GE Chairman & CEO, 1967-1972].  Reg Jones [GE Chairman & CEO 1972-1981] made his mark getting us out of it. Will someone have to bail him [Reginald Jones] out of Utah International?”  The combined Borch and Jones years are compared to the period from 2003-2018 during the tenure of Jeff Immelt in the chart below (using the approximate number of trading days going backward from January 19, 2018).

image

The entrance into the computer business followed by the entry into the mining business was simply one failure after the other.  Adding insult to injury is the fact that the period from 1967 to 1981 was a confirmed secular bear market for stocks.  However, the Utah International failure introduced the rampant and widespread use of creative accounting which would augment Jack Welch’s [GE Chairman & CEO 1981-2001] tenure during a secular bull market that began when the Dow Jones Industrial Average was trading at the 1,000 level and peaked at above 11,000.

1981-2001

Below is the stock price of GE during the Jack Welch years from 1981 to 2001 which coincided with a secular bull market in the same period of time.

image

The nature of secular bull markets often see company fundamentals improve and hopefully the stock price will follow.  As shown above, the price of GE increased more than 45 times in the period from 1981 to 2000.  However, when looking at the per share reported earnings, as provided by Value Line Investment Survey from 1982, we can see that earnings “only” increased a little less than 8 times.

image

While fundamentals, stock price, and market sentiment often coincide there is no rule that the stock price has to match the fundamentals in any way, shape, or form.  However, seeing an “industrial” company’s stock price out-distance the reported earnings by such a wide margin suggests that the stock price might gravitate towards a more “realistic” mean eventually.  The perfect setup for this reversion to the mean is a secular bear market, which in our view began in 2000 to 2016 period.

It could seem that choosing the year 2000 as the beginning of secular bear market is arbitrary, at best.  However, as noted before, the well established stock market secular cycles and Warren Buffett’s November 1999 commentary of below average market performance for the 2000 to 2016 period is enough to convince us that the period in question isn’t random.

2001-2018

This leads us to the Jeff Immelt era as Chairman & CEO of General Electric from 2001 to 2017.  There could not have been a worse period to be in charge of a hobbling industrial giant that is hamstrung with well entrenched accounting methods that work against the company when the stock price isn’t in a rising trend.

Remember, when Immelt took over at GE as Chairman & CEO on September 7, 2001, the stock price was already in the beginning stages of collapse after having fallen –34% up to that point.  Even of the price of GE were to trade in range it would be bad news for the company.  A falling stock price spelled disaster for investors who were hoping and expecting a rebound to the prior highs.

image

Many GE investors attribute the decline of GE’s stock price to the management practices of Jeff Immelt.  However, much of this view is simply the mistaken attribution of correlation as causation.

If Warren Buffett thought, in late 1999, that we’d be lucky to see average market returns of +4% and GE fundamentals are calibrated to do better when the stock price rises then there is no evidence to suggest that Immelt did anything that was materially harmful (actual inflation adjusted CAGR of the S&P 500 return was +2.27%).  Instead, what we’ve witnessed in GE stock price has been a reversion to the mean from the prior period of excess.

Price & Time Targets

Based on Edson Gould’s “Three Step” rule, GE has one more leg down.  In theory, this should bring the GE stock price below the 2009 low.  However, there is a lot of ground to cover for GE to get to the 2009 low and there is no guarantee that it will happen.  With this in mind, we’ll outline the previous two declines, 2000-2002 & 2007-2009, to establish any possible precedent that might emerge.

  • 2000-2002
    • The decline from the 2000 peak did not see any respite until 2002.  That decline saw General Electric fall –63%.  The period of decline lasted 530 trading days.
  • 2007-2009
    • The decline from the 2007 peak ended in early 2009 and was approximately –84%.  The period of decline lasted 359 trading days.
  • 2016-present
    • So far, the price of General Electric (GE) has declined approximately –50.62% and has lasted 381 trading days.  As seen in the chart below, GE has blasted through Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines at $25.66 and $18.32.

image

From what we can tell, the price target at the ascending $10.97 level is a lock (approximately $12.18).  This would match the decline that was experienced by GE in the period from 2000-2002.  The question becomes, will GE match the decline of 2007-2009, on a percentage basis.  If so, then GE would decline to as low as $5.27.  This would fit exactly with the nature and pattern of declines expressed by Gould in his “Three Step” rule.

Time targets seem to indicated that General Electric will reach the $10.97 or $5.27 low on April 20, 2018.  The speed at which the current decline is taking place indicates that sentiment will push the stock to the $5.27 price and the elimination from the Dow Jones Industrial Average is eminent.  We see the possible replacements for General Electric in the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) to be Adobe (ADBE), Expedia (EXPE), Google (GOOG) or Amazon (AMZN).  In the case of Google and Amazon, their inclusion into the DJIA is predicated on a 10:1 stock split.

sources:

  • Stuart, Reginald. $1.9 Billion G.E. Bid in Mining Merger. New York Times. December 16, 1975. page 1.
  • Smith, Gene. Acquisition Set Today of Utah International. New York Times. December 20, 1976. page 67.
  • Schilit, Howard. Financial Shenanigans,2nd edition. McGraw Hill. 2002. page 103.
  • Value Line Investment Survey. General Electric. 1982-2018.

U.S. Dividend Watch List: January 19, 2018

Previous Year Performance Review

In our ongoing review of the NLO Dividend Watch List, we have taken the top five stocks on our list from January 20, 2017 and have checked their performance one year later. The top five companies on that list can be seen in the table below.

Symbol Name 2015 Price 2016 Price % change
TGT Target Corp. 64.10 78.10 21.8%
VFC VF Corp. 51.85 79.79 53.9%
BF-B Brown-Forman Corp. CL 'B' 45.02 67.50 49.9%
KIM Kimco Realty Corp. 25.15 16.41 -34.8%
KO Coca-Cola Co 41.32 47.16 14.1%
      Average 21.0%
         
DJI Dow Jones Industrial 19,827.25 26,071.72 31.5%
SPX S&P 500 2,271.31 2,810.30 23.7%

While the average gain of the top five companies was exceptional in our view, the gain of +21% fall short of the S&P 500 gain of +23.70% gain and +31.50% gain of the Dow. The best performer was VF Corp (VFC). Because the company appeared on our list and seemed attractive to us on a fundamental basis, we took a long position.

Target (TGT) gained +21.80% over the course of the last year. We thought that the stock was attractive as negative news seemed to come out on a daily basis. A buyer of Target would have received 3.70% in dividends in addition to the price appreciation.

Looking back, it is clear that we missed an opportunity in Brown-Forman (BF-B), the maker of Jack Daniel's. Typically we find that companies with  strong brands and legacy assets to be attractive and we missed our mark with Brown-Forman. There were likely multiple factors which led us to ignore this company. However, our valuation model, based on the fundamentals, suggested that BF-B shares should be considered at or below the $45 level. Is there a lesson we can take away from this? We would say that, if and when a company with strong brands appear on our list, do not ignore them and consider doing the initial research.

U.S. Dividend Watch List: January 19, 2018

The list of 33 companies below represents have strong dividend track records. Not all companies on the list are at good values, they have fallen from their highs which we think is a good starting point to identifying potential long-term investments. Continue reading

Duke Energy: Downside and Time Targets

We’re very fascinated by the recent price activity of Duke Energy (DUK) and have decided to outline our thoughts on the downside targets that may exist for the stock.  Below we have applied Dow Theory and Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines for what we believe to be conservative estimates that may help investors avoid buying high, allow for buying low, or reduce loses.

Dow Theory says that investors should always refer back to the last time a given stock had performed the worst, on a fundamental basis, as the benchmark for estimating the prospects for going forward. 

"The point of importance for those who deal in industrial stocks is whether the capitalization of the companies into which they propose to buy is moderate or excessive, when compared with the aggregate earnings of the various concerns forming the combination in a period of depression. It is probable that consolidated companies will be able to earn as much in the next period of low prices as the companies forming the combine were able to earn in the last one; hence the very foundation of investments in industrials should be knowledge of what these companies earned, say in 1893 to 1896, making, perhaps, reasonable allowances for economies under consolidation. Where the earnings so shown would have provided dividends for industrials now active, the fact must be regarded as a very strong point in favor of those stocks (George W. Bishop Jr., Charles H. Dow: Economist, Dow-Jones & Company,Princeton, 1967, page 11.)"

If price action is a forward reflection of company fundamentals and investor sentiment, then the period from the 2003 low is the best starting point for our review.  The decline in DUK from the 2001 peak to the 2003 low was the worst decline in magnitude when the stock fell more than -70%.  We’re not suggesting that DUK will fall by that much this time, instead, we’re watching for the intermediate stages that lead up to a possible –70% decline.

Continue reading

Commodity Index Review: January 2018

In this posting, we’ll provide upside target price and date for the Bloomberg Commodity Index (BCOM).

Bitcoin: January 2018

On December 22, 2017, we said the following of Bitcoin:

  • “We believe that there is going to be limited upside in the near term.”
  • “We think that the conservative downside target ($6,884.31) will be achieved before a new high is seen.”
  • “In all prior booms, the subsequent bust AVERAGED –70% (data found here).”

Below is an updated review of Bitcoin and our thoughts for the price going forward.

Canadian Dividend Watch List: January 2018

Below is the performance of the January 22, 2017 Canadian Dividend Watch List:

symbol name %change
MRU.TO MetroInc. -1.41%
SJ.TO Stella-Jones Inc. 24.32%
FFH.TO Fairfax Financial Holdings 9.39%
PJC-A.TO The Jean Coutu Group 19.95%
ACD.TO Accord Financial Corp. 2.22%
EMA.TO Emera Incorporated 0.91%
ET.TO Evertz Technologies Limited 6.65%
BCE.TO BCE Inc. -1.58%
CUF-UN.TO Cominar REIT -0.48%

The average gain for the watch list was +6.66% while the gain for the Toronto Stock Exchange over the same period was +4.98%.  When broken down to the respective fundamental categories by only choosing the top three stocks, we get the following returns:

high p/b 1.22%
high yield 1.53%
high p/e 2.91%
low p/b 3.71%
watch list 6.66%
low p/e 8.69%
low yield 10.77%
   
TSX 4.98%

As we said in our December 13, 2017 Dogs of the TSX posting, “Note that all of the low categories performed better while all the high categories performed the worst.  This has been borne out in the few Canadian Dividend Watch List performance reviews that we’ve done so far.”  It appears that anyone buying Canadian stocks using the high yield methodology is underperforming when there are better alternatives.

Below is the January Dividend Watch List along with the our update on the Dogs of the TSX 60, the results are instructive.

Transaction Alert: VFC

On January 16, 2018, we executed the following transaction(s):