Author Archives: nlo-admin

Sell American States Water (AWR) at the Market

We believe that now is the time to consider selling American States Water (AWR) at the market based on a few indications in the water utility industry.

First, the price of American States Water (AWR) at point 2 has achieved the prior high that was set in 2007, at point 1, in the chart below.    Even the most minor downturn from the all-time high suggests that there is considerable downside risk, especially if the stock was bought at or near our March 7, 2010 recommendation of water utilities (found here).

image

Another factor being considered as part of our sell recommendation of AWR is that the water utility sector has experienced a triple top as indicated by the best performing industry ETF, First Trust ISE Water Index (FIW), since our March 7, 2010 recommendation of water utilities in the chart below (FIW is the blue line).

image

We have to hold our nose to the idea that First Trust ISE Water Index is the best representation of water utilities since its composition is hardly a pure play on the sector. We’ve included the comparison of other water ETFs including the Guggenheim S&P Global Water Index (CGW), PowerShares Water Resources (PHO), and PowerShares Global Water (PIO) to demonstrate the relative weakness of the sector overall.

Finally, the recent run-up in AWR has helped the stock to achieve gains that have exceeded the returns of the Dow Jones Industrial Average (^DJI) from the March 8, 2010 to the present.

image

The overall under-performance of AWR as compared to the Dow Industrials in prior periods suggests that the stock should be sold to take advantage of the exceptional gains since April 2012.

Some will likely argue that there is more upside potential based on the recent move in AWR.  A favorite argument for water utilities is that water is fast becoming “scarce.”  However, our prior disclaimer on the issue of water scarcity, from our October 31, 2009 recommendation of AquaAmerica (found here), encapsulates the problems faced by the industry:

“Although this is a water utility [AquaAmerica (WTR)] and water is critical to life, investors need to understand that companies in this industry aren’t a ‘sure thing.’ The biggest reason for this is that when, and if, water becomes scarce, government regulators will step in to take over (nationalize) what should otherwise be sold at the most profitable price (thereby curbing wasteful consumption.) There is literally an upside cap on profitability to a company like this [AquaAmerica (WTR)] due to the critical importance of the resource being sold.”

The lows experienced after the 2009 bottom and the nearly 3 1/2 year stock market rally indicates that certain positions need to be pared down.  Recommendation to buy American States Water (AWR) based on their fundamentals are likely reflections of past performance being projected too far into the future and would not necessarily hold up in the short to medium-term.  We believe that American Water Works can be acquired at more favorable prices going forward.

Sell Target (TGT) at the Market

Target (TGT) last appeared on our June 25, 2011 U.S. Dividend Watch List (found here).  At the time, TGT had a dividend yield of 2.59% and was trading at $46.33.  However, Fitch rating agency had just downgraded the company from A to A-.  At the time, we said that TGT was undervalued with a yield of 2% and “…even more attractive at a 2.59% yield.”  Slightly more than one year later, Target is now selling at a 52-week high.

The chart below reflects just how much the market has come to realize the relative undervalued nature of TGT.

image

Because Target (TGT) has gained +37.11% in capital appreciation plus +2.59% in reinvested dividend income, we recommend selling the principal portion that was invested and seek out new opportunities found on our current dividend watch lists.

Gold Stock Indicator: Short-term signal is down

Today we’ve received an indication that on a short-term basis, the direction for gold stocks is down. 

image

As can be seen in the chart of our Gold Stock Indicator, the long-term buy indication has been triggered with the added bonus of a significant double-bottom on May 15th and July 23rd.  This suggests that the long-term trend in the price for the Philadelphia Gold and Silver Stock Index (XAU) is up.  However, as with any trend up or down, there are going to be counter-trend moves.  Already, there have been five buy signals for gold stocks even though the overall trend has been down since November 2010.

Regarding the short-term Gold Stock Indicator being down:

  • For speculators, this means that DUST is a buy.  The minimum downside risk DUST is $30 and could potentially decline to as low as $25.  Remember, both DUST and NUGT are intended to be utilized for short periods of time.
  • Holders of Agnico-Eagle (AEM) should sell their position in this stock as it has increased over +40% since our April 8, 2012 recommendation (found here).  It is suggested that only the principal is sold while the profit is allowed to grow risk-free.

U.S. Dividend Watch List: August 17, 2012

Below are the 17 companies on our U.S. Dividend Watch List that are within 11% of their respective 52-week lows. Stocks that appear on our watch lists are not recommendations to buy. Instead, they are the starting point for doing your research and determining the best company to buy. Ideally, a stock that is purchased from this list is done after a considerable decline in the price and rigorous due diligence.

Symbol Name Price % Yr Low P/E EPS (ttm) Dividend Yield Payout Ratio
CAH Cardinal Health, Inc.  39.70 2.96% 12.97 3.06 0.95 2.39% 31%
ERIE Erie Indemnity Company  63.54 3.94% 22.29 2.85 2.21 3.48% 78%
MCD McDonald's Corp.  87.36 4.44% 16.42 5.32 2.80 3.21% 53%
MCY Mercury General Corp. 37.79 4.94% 14.42 2.62 2.44 6.46% 93%
UNM Unum Group 19.40 6.13% 26.22 0.74 0.52 2.68% 70%
ANAT American National Insurance 70.17 6.79% 10.38 6.76 3.08 4.39% 46%
OMI Owens & Minor, Inc. 28.33 9.51% 15.40 1.84 0.88 3.11% 48%
HRC Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. 27.05 9.56% 11.66 2.32 0.50 1.85% 22%
MATW Matthews International Corp.  30.64 9.90% 13.80 2.22 0.36 1.17% 16%
EXPD Expeditors International 38.29 9.93% 22.79 1.68 0.56 1.46% 33%
BDX Becton, Dickinson and Co. 76.55 10.00% 13.87 5.52 1.80 2.35% 33%
PPL PP&L Corporation 29.41 10.23% 10.00 2.94 1.44 4.90% 49%
CAG ConAgra Foods, Inc. 24.73 10.45% 22.08 1.12 0.96 3.88% 86%
ADM Archer Daniels Midland Co. 26.17 10.47% 14.22 1.84 0.70 2.67% 38%
WGL WGL Holdings, Inc. 40.73 10.56% 20.68 1.97 1.60 3.93% 81%
RLI RLI Corp. 64.40 10.65% 12.53 5.14 1.28 1.99% 25%
HRL Hormel Foods Corp. 28.64 10.71% 16.46 1.74 0.60 2.09% 34%
17 Companies

Watch List Review

Cardinal Health (CAH) moved from the 3rd spot to the top of our list this week.  With the 13-F filing released, we found that Loews Corp. doubled its holding of the stock from 50k shares to 100k shares.  In addition to that, the board approved a $750m share repurchase.

Technically speaking, CAH has been trading between a $39 and $43 range for a year.  Any break above the $43 level would be a bullish sign and a break below $39 would mark a bearish signal.  Any trader would take positions now with a stop slightly below $39.  However, we feel that a long-term investor could buy the shares knowing the stock has traded in-line or as expected.  Our model indicates that shares of CAH should be bought anywhere below $40 and would be a bargain around $26.

Erie Indemnity (ERIE) is an insurance broker and is a new addition to our list.  One of the biggest things we noticed is the amount of cash the company has on its book.  The ERIE holds $2.76B in cash and the market cap is $3.39B.  That cash holding contributes to 81% of the company value.  Although we don’t know for sure the implication of that, we believe it may be because of the cash reserve they are required to hold.  But when we compared that to their competitors, that cash reserve is much higher than most.  Valueline indicates that Erie is considered at fair value at 15x earnings, thus 22x trailing 12-month earnings and 19x forward earnings doesn’t scream out buy just yet.

McDonald (MCD) is trading just 4% above its 52-week low.  Weakness in Asia and Europe continue to hold the stock back.  Commodity costs may also contribute to the margin squeeze.  At $87/share, MCD is approaching our ‘buy’ price according to our model.  If the bear market take its toll, our model indicates that we could possibly see the stock trade at $50/share.  IQTrends indicate that this name is approach its undervalue range at 3.6% dividend yield.

Top Five Performance Review

In our ongoing review of the NLO Dividend Watch List, we have taken the top five stocks on our list from August 19,  2011 and have check their performance one year later. The top five companies on that list can be seen in the table below.

Symbol Name 2011 Price 2012 Price % change
BOH Bank of Hawaii Corp. 37.44 47.13 25.88%
LNC Lincoln National Corp. 19.46 23.89 22.76%
SEIC SEI Investments Company  15.71 21.89 39.34%
STT State Street Corp. 31.91 41.91 31.34%
BBT BB&T Corp. 19.27 31.96 65.85%
Average 37.04%
DJI Dow Jones Industrial 10,817.65 13,275.20 22.72%
SPX S&P 500 1,123.53 1,418.16 26.22%

NLO_2012.8.17

Our top five outperformed the market by a wide margin.  Four of the five companies are in the financial sector.  When many companies from the same sector appear in our watch list as the top five, it is a good sign that they are undervalued.

Canadian Dividend Watch List: August 17, 2012

This is a list of Canadian dividend stocks that currently, or in the past, had a history of consecutive dividend increases. For those wishing to find the most complete fundamental information on these companies, we recommend visiting one of Canada’s leading financial websites, the Financial Post (found here). However, Yahoo!Finance probably has the better long-term charts and historical dividend data.

Symbol Name Price P/E EPS Yield Price/Book % from low
IGM.TO IGM Financial Inc. 37.25 11.3 3.3 0.40% 2.19 1.20%
FFH.TO FAIRFAX FINANCIAL HOLDINGS LTD. 379.97 0 0 2.70% 1.07 3.59%
GS.TO Gluskin Sheff + Associates, Inc. 13.89 8.37 1.27 4.50% 5.26 5.47%
SJR-B.TO Shaw Communications, Inc. 20.01 19.33 1.52 4.90% 2.58 5.71%
SNC.TO SNC-Lavalin Group Inc. 37.41 14.06 1.98 1.60% 2.89 7.13%
PWF.TO Power Financial Corporation 25.31 11.37 2.42 5.60% 1.53 7.15%
AGF-B.TO AGF Management Limited 11.56 8.9 1.02 9.40% 0.94 7.24%
RBA.TO Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated 19.25 32.08 0.77 2.60% 3.19 7.54%
CCA.TO Cogeco Cable Inc. 37.08 7.3281 5.06 2.70% 1.55 7.63%
EMP-A.TO Empire Company Limited 58.21 10.64 4.99 1.70% 1.16 8.91%

Watch List Summary

Of particular interest on this Canadian Watch List is Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA).  The very first time that this company appeared on our list was August 23, 2010 when the stock was trading at $18.94.  Immediately after showing up on our list, RBA vaulted to $29.66 or +56% by April 29, 2011.

image

After attaining the $29.66 level, Ritchie Bros. declined –36% back to the $18.85 level.  RBA then rose nearly +37% by late February 2012 before returning to the current level of $19.25.  The consistency of RBA to rise from the $18/$19 level in the last 6 years has got to end somewhere.  The stock market is very quick to take away anything that appears too easy.  Therefore, we need to find a reasonable margin for error if we were to enter into such a transaction.

According to Yahoo!Finance, Ritchie Bros. is “…an industrial auctioneer, sells various equipment to on-site and online bidders. The company, through unreserved public auctions, sells a range of used and unused industrial assets, including equipment, trucks, and other assets utilized in the construction, transportation, agricultural, material handling, mining, forestry, petroleum, and marine industries.”

We normally don’t rely on “stories” behind a stock because such analysis typically leads to false hope and unrealistic expectations.  However, here is what we think the “story” on RBA might be.  As secular bear markets tend to coincide with a commodity bull market, there will be a high demand for the very equipment that RBA auctions.  As many companies try and fail to enter into the capital intensive mining and farming sector, RBA will be quick to step in and auction the equipment that will be in high demand.  The more auctions, while there is exceptional demand for the equipment, the better the earnings for RBA.

image

According to Edson Gould’s Altimeter, Ritchie Bros. hit an extreme low in 2009.  Through all of the gyrations in the market since, RBA’s Altimeter is now trading at the equivalent level as the 2009 low.

In terms of the downside risk on RBA, we believe that a critical support level is at $17.84.  According to Dow Theory, if RBA were to fall significantly below this level then the next downside targets would be (indicates percentage decline from current price of $19.25):

  • $15.81 (-17.87%)
  • $13.78 (-28.42%)
  • $11.75 (-38.96%)

From a Dow Theory standpoint, RBA is dancing along that fine line of $17.84 and has successfully done so for the last 6 years.  This suggests that the stock has either pent up value or is going to get crushed to the downside.  Cautious as we might be under normal circumstances, we believe that RBA is worth considering at the current price with another planned purchase if the stock declines to the $13.78 level.

Dividend Investors: Beware of Payments in Gold

As long-term investors in precious metals, we have featured several articles that warned about the pitfalls of gold and silver investing rather than highlighting the redeeming attributes in the sector.  One reason for this is the one-sided analysis that permeates throughout the gold and silver investment community.

Too often there are voices clamoring for attention about reasons to invest in gold and silver and very few of those same voices willing to say “dump the junk.”  Some analysts in the gold sector will defy logic by recommending gold stocks in an obvious declining trend rendering their analysis moot since anyone can use the rationale “we’re in a bull market” to justify their claims.

One sure sign that we’re in a gold bull market is when gold and silver mining companies start paying ever increasing dividends.  In a 2009 article titled “Why Silver Beats Gold As a Precious Metals Play,” we said, “be mindful of the coming competitive dividend war between precious metal companies.”  Apparently, precious metal stocks have not disappointed in sharing the wealth in the current gold bull market. According to Morningstar.com, in the last five years the top ten dividend increasing companies in the precious metal sector has averaged +29.61%.  We don’t expect this trend to reverse in the near term.

Symbol Company 5-year dividend growth rate
AEM Agnico-Eagle 84.42%
AUY Yamana Gold 50.61%
IAG IamGold 29.87%
DRD DRDGold 26.08%
NEM Newmont Mining 20.11%
GG Goldcorp 19.26%
ABX Barrick Gold 18.31%
BVN Buenaventura 17.97%
RGLD Royal Gold 17.50%
GFI Gold Fields 11.98%
Average dividend growth rate 29.61%
Source: Morningstar.com accessed August 15, 2012

Also, in the same 2009 article and later reiterated in our 2011 article titled “The Coming Precious Metals Dividend War,” we said the following, “one gold or silver company is going to ‘jump the shark’ and make the dividend payments in the actual metal. When that time comes, it will be fair warning to protect your positions, though this may be indistinguishable to ebullient gold bugs at the time.”  When we published our October 13, 2011 article titled “Gold Resource: Gold Dividend Means Sell” we felt that precious metal investors had been given fair warning that “…it may be an indication of a cyclical or short-term top in the gold market.”

The announcement by Gold Resource (GORO) that the option for an “in-kind” dividend in the form of gold was on August 17, 2011 (PDF found here).  Three trading days later, the price of the SPDR Gold Shares (GLD), according to Yahoo!Finance, peaked at $184.59.  Twelve trading days after GORO’s announcement, according to Kitco.com, the London PM fix for gold closed at the peak price of $1,895.  At the same time, the long established Philadelphia Gold and Silver Stock Index (XAU) declined as much as –33% by May, 15, 2012 and has settled at a loss of -26.80%.

image

As the precious metals dividend war heats up, the timing, nature of the dividend, and the quality of the company will provide for some perspective as to whether we are at a short/long-term peak in the precious metal market.

However, as we’ve said in the past, companies that pay dividends in gold have historically had difficulty in retaining such a policy.  Those companies that currently have a policy of offering dividend payments in gold should be expected to discontinue such distributions at some point down the road.  When that change in policy arrives, the news could push the respective gold and silver stock prices well below known “undervalued” levels.

If you must invest in precious metal stocks, we’d opt for those that are part of the XAU Index or the HUI Gold Bug Index and pay their dividends only in the form of cash.

Insurance Watch List: August 13, 2012

The following is one of our personal favorite watch lists. We started tracking the insurance industry in January 2011 and we’re very impressed with the results so far.

Anyone who wishes to be successful in insurance stocks should read the book The Davis Dynasty by John Rothchild. The book starts with Shelby Collum Davis investing approximately $50,000 to $100,000 that ultimately grew to $900 million after 47 years. The strategies employed by Davis seem more accessible to average investors as opposed to Warren Buffett’s leveraged strategies and education from Benjamin Graham.

Symbol Name Price P/E EPS Yield P/B Dividend payout ratio % from low
MCY Mercury General Corporation 37.3 14.24 2.62 6.6 1.1 2.44 93.13% 3.90%
ERIE Erie Indemnity Company 63.69 22.37 2.85 3.4 4.49 2.21 77.54% 4.19%
OB OneBeacon Insurance Group, Ltd. 12.69 22.38 0.57 6.6 1.07 0.84 147.37% 5.75%
TWGP Tower Group Inc. 18.76 47.14 0.4 4 0.71 0.75 187.50% 5.87%
FRFHF Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited 385 33.64 11.85 0 1.13 0 0.00% 5.90%
UNM Unum Group 19.39 26.31 0.74 2.7 0.65 0.52 70.27% 6.07%
FSR Flagstone Reinsurance Holdings SA 6.8 - -1.3 2.3 0.58 0.16 -12.31% 6.08%
WSH Willis Group Holdings Public Ltd. 35.5 14.99 2.37 3 2.29 1.08 45.57% 7.45%
ANAT American National Insurance Co. 70.73 10.46 6.76 4.3 0.58 3.08 45.56% 7.64%
THG The Hanover Insurance Group Inc. 35.16 14.55 2.42 3.4 0.6 1.2 49.59% 8.02%
ESGR Enstar Group Limited 93.78 7.69 12.19 0 1.07 0 0.00% 8.35%
MIG Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc. 7.07 18.51 0.38 2.8 0.61 0.2 52.63% 8.44%
UNAM Unico American Corp. 10 20.83 0.48 2 0.71 0.2 41.67% 8.58%
RLI RLI Corp. 63.37 12.34 5.14 2 1.59 1.28 24.90% 8.88%
KFS Kingsway Financial Services Inc. 1.96 - -1.02 0 0.23 0 0.00% 8.89%
AIZ Assurant Inc. 34.91 5.6 6.23 2.3 0.59 0.84 13.48% 9.09%
NSEC National Security Group Inc. 8.35 - -3.16 4.6 0.77 0.4 -12.66% 9.15%
UVE Universal Insurance Holdings Inc. 3.31 8.11 0.41 9.6 0.82 0.32 78.05% 9.97%

Watch List Summary

On top of our watch list is Mercury General (MCY).  Because we like MCY as a trade and plan to buy the stock in our partnership account, we’d like to recommend an article with a negative view to offset our current favorable perspective.  The article is titled “ "Mercury General: High Yield, And High Risk" and outlines many good reasons to avoid the stock (found here).  Our experience with stocks near a new low is that there are great articles that can counteract much of the positive that we might see in a stock.  However, we believe that the aforementioned article is a good antidote to our recommendation.

According to Morningstar.com , MCY is considered a “buy” at $31 and at fair value at $45.  Our own model suggests that MCY is significantly undervalued at $39 and a “buy” at $45. Investment Quality Trends (www.iqtrends.com) indicates that when MCY is at a yield of 4.5% or higher, the stock should be considered for purchase.  Currently, MCY has a dividend yield of approximately 6.60%.  Keep in mind that we do not buy stocks for their dividend yield.  Instead, we use the company’s consistently increasing dividend as the only proof that the company management can:

  • increase earnings over time
  • reward current shareholders

Looking at Edson Gould’s Altimeter reveals that in the short-term Mercury General is undervalued.  However, when contrasted against the long-term picture from 1990 to the present, it is revealed that MCY has undergone a massive amount of change in valuation (see inset).

image

The new reality of Mercury General’s altimeter is a far cry from what it was in the past.  We’ve had to adjust our expectations for the stock with this new reality.  For now, the buy range for the Altimeter is at 65 and below suggesting that any price below $39.65 is reasonable.  MCY should be sold when the stock trades at or above 75 or $45.75.  Based on the current price of $37.30, MCY could potentially rise 22% from the current level.

Additionally, we see the downside risk, under “normal” market conditions, to be limited to the $31-$33 price range (approximately –17% from the current level).  Again, we see MCY as a reasonable way to achieve decent gains in the short to medium-term (approximately 10%-20% in the next year).

Also of particular interest to us is the second company on our list, Erie Indemnity (ERIE).  Erie seems like the type of company that should get bought out by Warren Buffett.  The aggressive rate that the dividend has been increased over the years has pushed this stock into the bargain basement.  ERIE has absolutely no debt with $2.76 billion in cash.  While ERIE is trading at a new one year low, Dow Theory suggests the following downside targets to consider:

  • $60.77
  • $50.46 (fair value)
  • $40.13

We suspect that ERIE will eventually sell close to the fair value level of $50.46 before rebounding to higher prices.  This is a great stock where dollar cost averaging as the price declines will definitely pay off (see more of the pros and cons of dollar cost averaging here).

Clean Harbors (CLH): Downside Targets

On February 9, 2012, when the stock was trading at $64.28, we reviewed the Speed Resistance Lines for Clean Harbors (CLH).  At that time we indicated the Clean Harbors had the following downside targets (found here):

  • $43.53
  • $31.00
  • $22.53

Currently, Clean Harbors (CLH) has declined to the $54.80 level which, in our view, happens to be a critical support level for shareholders of the stock.  As can be seen in the chart below, the price of CLH fell below the 200-day moving average (red line) on June 1, 2012.  Additionally, on three occasions the price of CLH attempted and failed to exceed the 200-day moving average (red line).

image

CLH is now bouncing along the support level of $55 (blue line).  It is not clear whether the stock is going to retest the 200-day moving average which presently sits at $61.94.  However, any additional decline in the stock price will likely lead to falling to $47.83.

Dow Theory Update

On May 19, 2012, we said that the bear market rally had ended (found here).  In our view, we believed that the Dow Jones Jones Industrial Average would not exceed the high of 13,279.32 set on May 1, 2012.  The most recent run of the Dow Industrials is causing us to wonder if our assessment was correct.

Despite our concern that the Dow Industrials will increase above 13,279.32, we do need to point out  two technical non-confirmations of the market that have been established so far.  First is the secular (long-term) level of the market.  Ordinarily, the secular (long-term) trend of the market would be bullish when and if both the Industrials and Transports rise above their respective 2007 to 2012 peaks.

As can be seen in the chart below, the horizontal black lines shows that the Transportation Index managed to rise above the prior high of 2007/2008.  At the same time, the Dow Jones Industrial Average did not come as close to the prior highs.  This lack of confirmation suggests that we are still in a secular (long-term) bear market.

image

At the same time, on a cyclical basis (short-term), as indicated by the green lines above, the Dow Jones Industrial Average and Transportation Average have gone their separate ways.  The Dow Jones Industrial Average trending higher while the Dow Jones Transportation Average has trended lower.

So far, all indications are that we’re in a cyclical and secular bear market.  Since our bear market indication of August 2, 2011 (found here), we have not received any indication to the contrary.  However, if we’re completely wrong about the bearish direction of the market, a Dow Theory bull market indication on a cyclical basis (short-term) would occur if the Dow Industrials and Transports were to increase above 13,279.32 and 5,627.85, respectively.  Additionally, a bull market indication on a secular basis (long-term) would occur when the Dow Industrials and Transports exceed their respective highs in the period from 2007 to 2012.

Despite our concern for the bear market that we are in, we continue to pursue the policy of accumulating stocks that appear reasonably undervalued which is in accordance with Charles H. Dow’s emphasis on values at a reasonable prices. Our most recent purchases of Carbo Ceramics (CRR) and Expeditors International of Washington (EXPD) brings our partnership portfolio to 57.78% in stocks and 42.22% in cash.

Priceline.com (PCLN) Downside Targets

In after-hours trading, Priceline.com (PCLN) has decline below the June 1, 2012 support level of $610.50.  By declining below such a level, it appears that we can project downside targets using Edson Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines.

image

Our current assessment of Priceline.com is far different from our examination of Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines on November 10, 2011 (found here).  As the price of PCLN has increased so does the downside targets. 

Over the next several months, we’ll be able to see if Priceline.com declines to the conservative target of $434.73 and then to the $317 level.  Our extreme downside target of $258.32 appears as an outlier event at this point but will be reconsidered if PCLN declines to $317.

Nasdaq 100 Watch List: August 6, 2012

Below are the Nasdaq 100 companies that are within 11% of their respective 52-week lows. Stocks that appear on our watch lists are not recommendations to buy. Instead, they are the starting point for doing your research and determining the best company to buy. Ideally, a stock that is purchased from this list is done after a considerable decline in the price and rigorous due diligence.

Symbol Name Price P/E EPS Price/Book % from low
EXPD Expeditors Int'l of Washington 36.04 20.83 1.73 3.66 3.47%
DELL Dell Inc. 11.8 6.74 1.75 2.2 3.60%
LRCX Lam Research Corporation 34.62 25.64 1.35 0.9 4.15%
CHRW CH Robinson Worldwide Inc. 53.63 19.72 2.72 6.79 5.55%
APOL Apollo Group Inc. 27.24 6.52 4.18 3.34 5.70%
INFY Infosys Ltd. 40.67 13.3 3.06 3.78 7.22%
NFLX Netflix, Inc. 56.79 32.3 1.76 4.35 7.54%
MRVL Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 11.12 11.91 0.93 1.3 8.28%
WYNN Wynn Resorts Ltd. 97.8 19.16 5.1 43.32 8.53%
CTRP Ctrip.com International Ltd. 13.47 14.93 0.9 1.7 8.98%
SPLS Staples, Inc. 13.08 9.39 1.39 1.26 9.55%
ATVI Activision Blizzard, Inc. 11.42 16.27 0.7 1.17 9.81%
RIMM Research In Motion Limited 7.26 - -0.1 0.38 10.67%

Watch List Summary

Standing out on our Nasdaq 100 Watch List is Lam Research (LRCX).  According the Yahoo!Finance, Lam Research is a company that “…designs, manufactures, markets, refurbishes, and services semiconductor processing equipments used in the fabrication of integrated circuits. The company offers etch products that remove portions of various films from the wafer in the creation of semiconductor devices.”

Starting with the fundamentals, Value Line Investment Survey indicates that LRCX has grow the book value from $5.20 in 2003 to the current level of $19.99 as of 2011.  Value Line suggests that LRCX has a fair value of 12x cash flow.  Based on the Value Line estimated cash flow of $2.60 for 2012, LRCX should be fairly valued at $31.20.  Value Line estimates that 2013 cash flow will be $4.55 resulting in a $54.60.  Additionally, shares outstanding have declined from 141 million shares to the estimated level of 119 million shares.

One issue that must be considered is the fact that in 2011, long-term debt skyrocketed 40 times the 2010 level.  This may have occurred at a time that borrowing costs are at their lowest point which ordinarily is a smart financial move.  However, we’d recommend considering the debt position as a potential negative before investing in LRCX.

Lam Research holds the largest market share of etchers (54% in 2011).  In our view their process technology is greater than its competitors, Applied Materials (AMAT) and Tokyo Electron.  Some of their top customers are Intel (INTC), Samsung, and TSMC (TSM).

According to Dow Theory, LRCX has the following downside targets:

  • $29.52
  • $24.59
  • $19.66
  • $14.73

Those interested in LRCX should consider buying the stock at $19.66 and below.

Watch List Performance Review

In our ongoing review of the Nasdaq 100 Watch List, we have taken the top five stocks on our list from August 12, 2011 and have checked their performance one year later. The top five companies on that list can be seen in the table below.

Symbol
Name 8/12/2011 8/6/2012 % change
INFY Infosys Limited 53.78 40.67 -24.38%
ATVI Activision Blizzard, Inc 10.71 11.42 6.63%
LIFE Life Technologies 38.42 45.72 19.00%
NIHD NII Holdings, Inc. 36.9 8.08 -78.10%
AMGN Amgen Inc. 50 82.43 64.86%
-2.40%
NDX Nasdaq 100 2182.05 2694.09 23.47%

image

The top five on our Watch List from last year were crushed when compared to the performance of the Nasdaq 100 Index.  Three stocks on our watch list (ATVI, LIFE, AMGN) were able to achieve 10% or greater within a one year timeframe.

Transaction Alert: Bought CRR and EXPD at the Market

  • We have taken a 5% position in Carbo Ceramics (CRR) at the average price of $65.02.
  • We have taken a 5% position in Expeditors International (EXPD) at the average price of $36.28.

Carbo Ceramics (CRR) has been mentioned by us on several occasions.  CRR first appeared on our February 10, 2012 U.S. Dividend Watch List (found here) and was trading at $85.94.  An Altimeter was run on CRR which indicated that the stock would be undervalued at $62.40 (found here).  However, as CRR has experienced a dividend increase of 12.5% since our May 28, 2012 Altimeter, the stock is now considered undervalued at $70.  While we do expect approximately 20% downside risk from the current price, we are comfortable with adding to our position when such a decline takes place.

Expeditors International of Washington (EXPD) is a stock that we have a history with.  We initially bought EXPD on September 9, 2011 in all of our accounts.  When the stock achieved an +11% gain we sold the principal in our tax deferred accounts while our taxable partnership account held on to the shares.  We are now buying an equal number of shares that were originally bought in the partnership account.  Additionally, we are adding to our existing shares of EXPD (profit portion) in the tax deferred accounts.

U.S. Dividend Watch List: August 3, 2012

Below are the 24 companies on our U.S. Dividend Watch List that are within 11% of their respective 52-week lows. Stocks that appear on our watch lists are not recommendations to buy. Instead, they are the starting point for doing your research and determining the best company to buy. Ideally, a stock that is purchased from this list is done after a considerable decline in the price and rigorous due diligence.

Symbol Name Price % Yr Low P/E EPS (ttm) Dividend Yield Payout Ratio
CRR Carbo Ceramics, Inc. 64.69 2.68% 11.33 5.71 1.08 1.67% 19%
EXPD Expeditors International 36.10 3.65% 20.87 1.73 0.56 1.55% 32%
CAH Cardinal Health, Inc.  39.24 4.56% 13.30 2.95 0.95 2.42% 32%
MATW Matthews International  29.16 4.59% 13.32 2.19 0.36 1.23% 16%
HRC Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. 25.90 4.90% 11.16 2.32 0.50 1.93% 22%
UNM Unum Group 19.18 4.92% 25.92 0.74 0.52 2.71% 70%
JCI Johnson Controls Inc  24.59 5.22% 9.80 2.51 0.72 2.93% 29%
ERIE Erie Indemnity Company  65.93 5.29% 22.27 2.96 2.21 3.35% 75%
CHRW C.H. Robinson Worldwide  53.60 5.49% 19.71 2.72 1.32 2.46% 49%
HHS Harte-Hanks, Inc. 6.52 5.84% 9.59 0.68 0.34 5.21% 50%
IBKC IBERIABANK Corp.  45.37 6.73% 20.53 2.21 1.36 3.00% 62%
BDX Becton, Dickinson 74.35 6.84% 13.54 5.49 1.80 2.42% 33%
ADM Archer Daniels Midland 25.54 7.81% 13.88 1.84 0.70 2.74% 38%
ANAT American National Insurance 70.94 7.96% 9.98 7.11 3.08 4.34% 43%
HRL Hormel Foods Corp. 28.00 8.23% 16.09 1.74 0.60 2.14% 34%
OMI Owens & Minor, Inc. 28.04 8.39% 15.24 1.84 0.88 3.14% 48%
MCY Mercury General Corp. 36.65 8.40% 13.99 2.62 2.44 6.66% 93%
MCD McDonald's Corp.  89.59 9.24% 16.84 5.32 2.80 3.13% 53%
ABM ABM Industries, Inc. 18.90 9.31% 15.12 1.25 0.58 3.07% 46%
MGRC McGrath RentCorp.  23.68 9.58% 12.08 1.96 0.94 3.97% 48%
PBI Pitney Bowes Inc  13.86 9.65% 4.05 3.42 1.50 10.82% 44%
COP ConocoPhillips 55.71 10.06% 6.51 8.56 2.64 4.74% 31%
STBA S&T BanCorp., Inc.  16.81 10.52% 14.25 1.18 0.60 3.57% 51%
CAG ConAgra Foods, Inc. 24.57 10.68% 21.94 1.12 0.96 3.91% 86%
24 Companies

Watch List Review

Carbo Ceramics (CRR) continues to trade down and has broken the $70 mark.  On the technical level, shares remain in bearish territory.  After the company reported the Q2 earnings, share took a dive.  Despite not meeting analysts’ expectation, the company revenue and earnings rose 19% and 7% respectively.  In addition, the board approved a 13% increase in the dividend.  Here’s the summary of some of the price targets and analyst ratings on Carbo Ceramics.

  • Dahlman Rose – maintain Buy rating, lower price target from $99 to $84.
  • BMO Capital – maintain Outperform, lower price target from $130 to $100.
  • Howard Weil – cut target price from $108 to $83.
  • Tudor Pickering – lower rating from buy to accumulate.
  • Morgan Stanley – lower rating to Underweight, lower price target to $55.

Expeditors (EXPD) shares are trading in tandem with the Dow Jones Transportation Index.  Goldman Sachs initiates coverage on Expeditors with a Sell rating on the stock with price target of $35.  Goldman said, “In our view, Expeditors is a well run business in a highly fragmented and competitive industry, but trade growth is slowing cyclically and we expect this to negatively impact the company’s top line growth resulting in earnings to disappointment.  We do not believe this is discounted at current valuations.”  Here’s the summary of some of the research firm coverage.

Cardinal Health (CAH), the maker of medical equipment and supplies, is under pressure after Q4 revenue and earnings came in below analyst expectations. EPS was $0.68 vs $0.72 estimate; revenue was $26.76B vs the $27.27B estimate.  Credit Suisse maintains an outperform rating but lowered their target price slightly from $53 to $50.  JP Morgan also maintained their overweight rating but lowered the price target from $48 to $47.  We will dive more into the stock later in the week.

Top Five Performance Review

In our ongoing review of the NLO Dividend Watch List, we have taken the top five stocks on our list from August 6,  2011 and have check their performance one year later. The top five companies on that list can be seen in the table below.

Symbol Name 2011 Price 2012 Price % change
GBCI Glacier BanCorp., Inc.  12.41 15.21 22.56%
SYBT S.Y. BanCorp., Inc.  21.47 22.96 6.94%
BOH Bank of Hawaii Corp. 43.04 47.25 9.78%
O Realty Income Corp. 30.01 41.41 37.99%
SFNC Simmons First National Corp.  23.47 23.30 -0.72%
Average 15.31%
DJI Dow Jones Industrial 11,444.61 13,096.17 14.43%
SPX S&P 500 1,199.38 1,391.00 15.98%

NLO_2012.8.3

Our top five performance was in-line with the market.  All five companies managed to reach the 10% mark within one year.

Coppock Curve: July 2012

The Coppock Curve is one of the technical indicators that we focus on for long-term buying signals. The Coppock Curve is only useful as a BUY indicator when the chart goes from positive territory to the negative territory and then starts to turn decidedly upwards. As previously indicated, the Coppock Curve does not provide SELL signals in any way.

Once the signal starts to turn up, investors should consider buying stocks at the beginning of the month after the indicator turns upward. Our last "buy" indication came at the end of April 2009. Anyone who purchased the Dow Jones Industrial ETF (DIA) on the first trading day of May 2009, they would have gained +59% in the process.

After July 2012, the Coppock Curve remains far from the negative zone. This suggests that, overall, the market is not considered a "buy."

More about the Coppock Curve.

Gold Stock Indicator: The Big Picture

Article Summary

  • Start accumulating gold stocks now
  • select gold stocks from those in the XAU Index
  • at minimum, investors must allow for 25% downside risk before reinvesting more funds

Our Take

On November 2, 2011, we posted an article which highlighted the fact that gold stocks routinely underperform the price of gold (found here). Also in that article, we introduced our Gold Stock Indicator to show that the timing of when to buy gold stocks was more important than the fact that prices and valuations appear to be low.

To demonstrate the significance of our indicator, we’d like to contrast it to the widely used Gold/XAU ratio. According to noted market commentator and fund manager John Hussman:

“…since 1974, the Gold/XAU ratio has been greater than 5.0 about 15% of the time. When the ratio has been this high, the XAU has followed with annualized gains of 89.6%, on average.” (Hussman, John. “Gold/XAU Ratio Signals Buy for Gold Stocks”. Seeking Alpha. March 13, 2007.)

Below is a chart of the Gold/XAU ratio since December 12, 1983:

image

Unfortunately, as gold has transitioned to a secular bull market cycle, the Gold/XAU ratio since 1999 has not provided a consistent signal of when to buy and sell gold stocks. In fact, on July 15, 2008, the Gold/XAU ratio indicated that gold stocks should be bought even as the XAU Index was about to fall an additional –66%.

Also popular among gold investors is the inverse chart of the same ratio known as the XAU/Gold ratio or gold stock/gold ratio. Many variations of these ratios are carelessly used by market commentators with the hope to prove that gold stocks should be acquired. So far, the Gold/XAU ratio has incorrectly indicated that gold stocks are a “buy” for the past 998 trading days in a row. Few who make reference to these ratios are willing to show the full history of these gold and gold stock ratios. In all cases, the ratio is the same and since July 15, 2008 has failed to steer gold stock investors away from significant loses in gold stocks.

In stark contrast, our Gold Stock Indicator had been able to consistently identify long-term opportunities of when to buy and sell gold stocks. Below is the most updated version of our Gold Stock Indicator:

image

At the current level, our indicator suggests that gold stocks should be accumulated. The last time that gold stocks were at the exact same level, gold and gold stocks posted the following returns:

Year(s) Gold XAU
1986-1987 22.35% 84.11%
1987-1989 -4.81% 52.87%
1992-1993 11.03% 66.44%
1997-2006 83.00% 113.54%
2008-2010 64.14% 99.95%
Average gain/loss 35.14% 83.38%

While we recommend accumulating gold stocks at this time, it is important to understand and accept the possible downside risks. Below is the percentage loss that was experienced after each indication to buy gold stocks and before any gains were realized:

1986 -16.57%
1992 -5.92%
1997 -34.54%
2008 -40.81%
Average Decline -24.46%

The 1987-1989 period was excluded from our downside risk data simply because it did not have any loss before moving to the sell indication. If we included the decline after the 1987 buy signal the average loss would have been –19.57% for all five buy signals since 1983. However, we’d like to opt for the more conservative figure of –24.46% to keep our expectation more realistic.

Those who wish to participate in the eventual run up in gold stocks should consider those that are a part of the XAU index. The members of the XAU index are ranked below based on the percentage from the 52-week low:

Symbol Name price P/E EPS Yield Price/Book % from Low % of Index
NEM Newmont Mining Corp. $45.06 97.31 0.46 3.1 1.72 5.12% 10.90%
BVN Buenaventura SA $36.89 11.17 3.31 2.1 2.88 5.45% 4.60%
ABX Barrick Gold Corporation $33.17 8.11 4.1 2.5 1.34 7.26% 16.00%
GFI Gold Fields Ltd. $13.09 9.72 1.34 4.6 1.66 11.70% 4.70%
AU AngloGold Ashanti Ltd. $34.55 894.90 0.04 1.2 240.61 12.61% 6.60%
PAAS Pan American Silver Corp. $15.18 5.19 2.93 1 0.82 12.68% 0.70%
GG Goldcorp Inc. $36.70 22.94 1.6 1.5 1.36 16.30% 14.50%
HMY Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd. $10.07 14.30 0.71 1 1.08 17.00% 2.20%
FCX Freeport-McMoRan $34.01 10.19 3.33 3.7 1.95 17.63% 15.70%
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation $8.59 0.00 -1.96 1.9 0.78 20.60% 3.40%
AUY Yamana Gold, Inc. $15.17 19.86 0.76 1.4 1.49 23.00% 5.60%
SLW Silver Wheaton Corp. $28.27 17.48 1.62 1.3 3.59 23.45% 4.80%
GOLD Randgold Resources Ltd. $91.18 19.84 4.6 0.4 3.68 25.11% 4.10%
SSRI Silver Standard Resources Inc. $13.07 15.24 0.86 0 1.06 30.02% 0.50%
RGLD Royal Gold, Inc. $76.63 46.43 1.65 0.8 2.57 34.40% 2.20%
AEM Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd. $44.16 0.00 -3.3 1.9 2.31 40.80% 3.60%

In theory, the stocks that have the largest weighting in the index contribute the most movement either up or down. However, this may not result in the largest percentage gains that are possible as compared to other stocks in the XAU index. We prefer those stocks that are nearest the low, so we’d opt for NEM, ABX and GG ahead of FCX, BVN and GFI.

Gold stocks that are a part of the XAU index have the benefit of institutional support and the risk of individual implosions. Also, as we’ve explained in our article titled “Why Gold Stocks Will Decline More Than the Markets,” gold stocks are tied strongly to the performance of the general stock market. This was graphically demonstrated in 2008 when gold stocks declined –68% in the period from March 14th to October 27th. Many claim that 2008 was an aberration, our analysis of gold stocks from the 1924 to the present clearly indicates that 2008 was not a fluke. Keep in mind that a –68% decline in the stock index means that individual stocks within the index likely fell much lower, on a percentage basis.

Investors should take their time in acquiring gold stocks as there is some downside risk. However, if 10%-15% of the portfolio is set aside for such investing, there are good opportunities if the purchases are done in stages.