U.S. Dividend Watch List: January 16, 2015

Top Five Watch List Performance Review

In our ongoing review of the NLO Dividend Watch List, we have taken the top five stocks on our list from January 17, 2014 and have checked the performance one year later. The top five companies on that list can be seen in the table below.

Symbol Name 2013 Price 2014 Price % change
TGT Target Corp. 60.24 74.94 24.4%
PM Philip Morris International 83.33 82.70 -0.8%
T AT&T Inc 33.70 33.80 0.3%
TEG Integrys Energy Group Inc 53.64 80.59 50.2%
ED Consolidated Edison 53.96 69.10 28.1%
      Average 20.4%
         
DJI Dow Jones Industrial 16,458.56 17,511.57 6.4%
SPX S&P 500 1,838.70 2,019.42 9.8%

Watch List Review

Our top five outperformed the market by a wide margin. The biggest contribution came from the utility sector. The search for yield has driven shares of Integrys Energy (TEG) and Consolidated Edison (ED) up by +50% and +28%, respectively. Interestingly, shares of Philip Morris (PM) and AT&T (T) which yielded above 4.5% didn't fair too well and were virtually flat for the year. Another exceptional performer was Target (TGT) which was hit with bad news about a data hack, at the time. As we mentioned one year ago, we believed the news provided long-term investors with great opportunity to buy shares at discount.

U.S. Dividend Watch List: January 16,2015

It was a tough week to navigate the market as volatility spiked with surge in Swiss Franc which took the market by surprise. The Swiss Franc jumped by nearly +30% against the euro and +18% against the dollar after the Swiss National Bank's decision to eliminate the cap it placed on the value of the Franc. We believe that a "black swan" type of event such as this creates volatility in favor long-term investor. At the end of the week, there are 89 companies to search through. However, we've filtered out some companies and have displayed 39 below. Continue reading

Gold Stock Indicator: January 16, 2015

If you like excitement and intrigue then invest in gold.  However, if you want a heart pounding adrenaline rush then try investing in gold stocks.  This past week, gold did nothing but go up, closing out the week with a gain of over +4%.  Gold stocks, on the other hand, tested the fortitude of investors by falling more than –6% but eventually closing up nearly +3%.

image

The recent surge of gold was due to the Swiss National Bank’s decision to remove the cap on the Swiss Franc.  Many are calling the Swiss decision a turning point in the bear market for gold.  However, we’d want to remind investors that the turning point, if in fact it is the ultimate low for gold, was on November 5, 2014.  That was the time and place when the low was established before increasing in value.

image

Bitcoin Plunges, Downside Target $125

On January 14, 2015, Bitcoin declined as low as $170 per U.S. dollar.  This comes three months after our October 7, 2014 article titled, “Bitcoin: Speculators Unite…” in which we proposed the following:

“with an increase in price from $99.81 to $1,147.25, participants should always step back and reassess the situation.  The reason why is because there have been few instances where a parabolic increase in price is sustained in the form of a new plateau.  With this consideration in mind, we believed that the prospects of the downside targets, dismal as they seemed at such heights, were a distinct reality.”

However, the nature of the October 7, 2014 piece implied that the price of Bitcoin was headed higher.  Little did we know that the actual trajectory would be a continuation of the declining trend.  Since the October 5th low, Bitcoin was only able to increase by as much as +33.66%.  Ultimately, the decline that ensued since October 5th has equaled –43.23%.

Below is the Edson Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines for Bitcoin with an updated chart.

image

All we can say is that the worst case scenario of $125 was always a distinct possibility.  A decline to the $125 level is now well within reach as the market for Bitcoin goes into panic mode.

Canadian Dividend Watch List: January 13, 2015

Performance Review

Below is the performance of the stocks found on our January 15, 2014 watch list.

Symbol Name 2014 2015 % change
FTS.TO Fortis Inc. 30.41 39.29 29.20%
CUF-UN.TO Cominar REIT 18.43 19.31 4.77%
D-UN.TO Dundee REIT 29.63 26.72 -9.82%
FCR.TO First Capital Realty Inc. 17.45 19.5 11.75%
CWT-UN.TO Calloway REIT 25.32 30.14 19.04%
REI-UN.TO Riocan REIT 24.98 28.86 15.53%
ESI.TO Ensign Energy Services Inc. 16.22 9.44 -41.80%
CAR-UN.TO Canadian Apt Properties REIT 21.51 27.12 26.08%
EMA.TO Emera Incorporated 31.17 39.44 26.53%
TA.TO TransAlta Corp. 13.95 10.85 -22.22%
LB.TO Laurentian Bank of Canada 46.29 47.49 2.59%
CU.TO Canadian Utilities Ltd. 36.65 41.69 13.75%
Average 6.28%

At the time, we re-ranked the stocks based on the projected price change using analyst earnings estimates.  In our analysis we said the following:

“Through a process of elimination, we would start with the stocks that are expected to decline the most in value over the next year.”

The chart below shows how the analyst estimates in blue varied dramatically compared to the actual performance in red after a year.

image

Again, the analyst estimates of earnings and our projections indicate that analysts will typically over-estimate the upside and downside prospects for a company.  In addition, analysts often mirror the current market sentiment for a company rather than take a view that comes in conflict with prevailing “wisdom.” In many respects, this allows for better anticipation of company prospects, provided the market retains its bullish mood.

Canadian Dividend Watch List: January 13, 2015

Below are the thirteen Canadian companies that are on our radar with the analyst estimates for the coming year.

Analyst Estimates

Below are the price projections based on analyst earnings estimates for the stocks on our recent Nasdaq 100 Watch List dated January 9, 2015.  These estimates project the 1 year price change for the respective stocks.

Consequences of Falling Oil Prices

Economic events never occur in a vacuum.  Usually there is a string of events that leads from one event to another. One big event can lead to an even bigger event that overshadows the prior calamities that triggered “The Big” event.  The February 9, 1983 issue of Richard Russell’s Dow Theory Letters covers  one market event that led to two major crises that happened at different periods in time.  The two events are joined at the hip based on the decline of oil prices.  This led two separate major bailouts that resulted in the structural shift in the way our brand of capitalism works.

The first event resulted in the Savings and Loan Crisis (S&L Crisis) and is thought to have begun in 1986 due to the Tax Reform Act of 1986 culminating in the bailout of many banks and the eventual bankruptcy of the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (FSLIC).

The second event resulted in the Mexican Peso Crisis with the outcome that major banking institutions like Citibank and Goldman Sachs needed to be bailed out.  It is important to note that the Peso Crisis is considered to be as a result of the peso devaluation in 1994.

The true roots of both the S&L Crisis and the Peso Crisis is the decline of oil prices after the inflationary peak in 1980-1981.  Richard Russell’s Dow Theory Letter Issue 854 highlights the seeds of destruction that were going to be much larger than even Russell could have imagined. However, if anyone wishes to understand how the snowball got rolling then this issue highlights the beginning.

The very first quote is an amazing insight of the American dependence of the high price of oil, Richard Russell says the following:

“We’re facing a situation (ironically) where the US is all for holding oil prices at a high level. The banks have lent huge sums of money both to private corporations and to oil producing nations-loans based on rising oil prices. If the oil price cracks badly,  the banks are going to have major problems. On top of that, the US depends on oil taxes (so called “excess profits” tax) for huge chunks of tax income. If oil prices crack then the profits for the oil companies will dive (which they are already doing) and the tax short-fall will be horrendous. (page 1)”

This commentary is staggering in the fact that it was so prescient.  The cracks in the armor of the American oil industry began in Texas when the easy money stopped raining down on oil dependent cities like Houston and Dallas.  In a 1988 issue of Dow Theory Letters, Russell had the following to say:

“With oil prices caving in, Texas now has more people leaving the state than coming in.( Dow Theory Letters. March 9, 1988. page 6.)”

The decline in oil prices led to a decline of jobs for that industry which resulted in a decline in real estate prices as people left the state of Texas.  Loans made by savings and loan institutions in the southwest U.S., to businesses and real estate investors, all went bad at the same time leading to the Savings and Loan Crisis (S&L Crisis).  The S&L Crisis cost several hundreds of billions of dollars and still exist as an off-budget item as part of our national debt.

The decline in the price of oil also crushed foreign economies dependent on the commodity.  The Mexican Peso Crisis, although officially listed as beginning in 1994, had its roots in the early 1980’s.  The natural outcome of this crisis was the bailout of large banking institutions like Citibank and Goldman Sachs when the government stepped in and bought the bad debt held by the bank’s all in gamble.

Likewise, the current boom in commodity rich countries (although somewhat cooler at present) like Australia, Brazil, Russia, China and India could experience significant shocks to their system depending on the level of loans made as “investments” by foreign banking institutions based on the potential of future growth.

Few understood or believed the impact and importance of high oil prices to the American economy at the time.  Even fewer understood the direct reliance of the U.S. government to high oil prices.  Investors should watch for the potential fallout that may arise from the recent precipitous decline in the price of oil.  The troubles afflicting Russia and Brazil’s Petrobras may be early indications of where the pain may be felt.

Nasdaq 100 Watch List: January 9, 2015

Performance Review

Below is the performance of the seven stocks from the January 10, 2014 Nasdaq 100 watch list compared to the performance of the Nasdaq 100 Index in the last year.

Symbol Name 2014 2015 % change
ALTR Altera Corp. 31.47 36.96 17.45%
SHLD Sears Holdings 36.71 34.3 -6.56%
GOLD Randgold Resources 61.57 74.91 21.67%
MXIM Maxim Integrated Products 28.15 32.99 17.19%
CHRW CH Robinson Worldwide 57.7 72.06 24.89%
EBAY eBay Inc. 52.16 55.63 6.65%
FAST Fastenal Company 47.7 45.99 -3.58%
  Average change 11.10%
         
  Nasdaq 100     18.18%

As a group, the stocks on our list underperformed the Nasdaq 100 by a wide margin. The first five stocks on our list averaged a gain of +14.92%.  Two stocks that we took positions in at the time were Altera (ALTR) and Randgold (GOLD).

Analyst Review

The chart below is what the analysts suggested the stocks would do…

image

…This is the graphical representation of what actually happened.

image

The observation of the data should be clear, the analysts expected declines for the coming year and the opposite occurred.  The projections were that Randgold (GOLD) would decline by nearly –50% and the stock increased by +21.67%.  From our perspective, the analysts provide a reasonable sound board for what to anticipate, as has been demonstrated with our Canadian and U.S. Watch Lists.

Nasdaq 100 Watch List: January 9, 2015

Below are the nine Nasdaq 100 companies that are on our radar.

Gold Stock Indicator: January 9, 2014

Gold, as represented by the SPDR Gold Trust (GLD), gained +1.89% while gold stocks, represented by the Philadelphia Gold and Silver Stock Index (XAU), gained +7.26% in the last week.

image 

Scary 1929 Chart Nearly One Year Later

In February of 2014, a widely publicized chart circulated about the similarity between a 1928-1929 stock chart and a 2012-2013 chart.  According to Tom McClellan of the McClellan Market Report:

“…between now [February 11, 2014] and May 2014, there is plenty of reason for caution.”

Since February 11, 2014, the Dow Jones Industrial Average has increased +11.06%.  In the period from February 11th to May 31st the index gained +4.52%.  So far, the scary 1929 chart has not held up to the lofty claim of presaging a bear market or a even a –10% decline.  We offered up our own interpretation regarding the chart and said the following:

“We love a declining stock market as much as the next value investor. However, implying that an -89% decline is in the works because the pattern appears similar to 1929 is ignoring the path to far more achievable downside targets.”

Our preliminary downside targets seemed reasonable at the time but were never achieved.  One downside target that we thought was important was the ascending trendline from the 2009 low.

image

We still think that investors should watch the ascending line in the chart above, which currently sits at the 15,780 level.  An additional downside target is the Dow Theory 50% Principle level of 12,286.68.

Commodity Index Review

On October 29, 2013, we did a review of the Dow Jones-UBS Commodity Index (now the Bloomberg Commodity Index [BCOM]) in which we concluded with the following commentary:

“Already we have indicated the extreme downside target for the commodity index at 79.32, based on the work of Edson Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines.  However, if we are in a commodity bull market, as we’ve made reference to in our January 1, 2009 article titled (found here), then there is a good chance that a bounce at the long-term technical support line would mark the end of the cyclical bear move in commodities.”

All along it had been our contention that if the commodity index bounced at the long-term technical support line then the declining trend would be over.  Unfortunately, that bounce never came to pass.  Only on a marginal basis did the price decline stall on or around mid-November 2014.

Since mid-November 2014, the Bloomberg Commodity Index has been in a free fall.  All that we can expect now is for the commodity index to decline to the following downside targets at 102, 83 and finally the extreme downside target of 79.26.

image

Oil and Gas Stock Index Downside Targets

In the period from 2002 to 2009, the NYSE Oil and Gas Stock Index (XOI) presents us with a possible template for what to expect in the current decline in the same index.  Below is Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines (SRL) for 2002 to 2009 of the XOI Index.

image

The above chart shows the conservative downside target of 1,326.48 and the extreme downside target of 543.36.  The mid-point of the downside targets is 934.92.  In the case of the XOI index, it managed to achieved the conservative and mid range for the index.  However, the extreme downside target was not achieved.  The full extent of the decline is indicated in red at the 761.30 level.

Our guess is that the XOI index will accomplish a similar pattern of “performance” on the downside in the current run as was the case in the 2002 to 2009 period.  We’ve charted the progress of the XOI Index in the period from 2008 to the present with Gould’s SRL.

image

The conservative downside target of 1,454.79 has been constructed while the mid-point of 1,015.10 is also indicated.  However, we did not include the extreme downside target of 575.41.  We did indicate in red the 812.08 level which was the extent of the decline in the period from the 2008 high to the 2009 low. 

Suffice to say that we expect the XOI index could easily fall to 1,015.10 and subsequently to the 812.08.  Those interested in the oil sector should start initiating positions at or below the ascending 1,015.10 level.  Two funds that trade in line with the XOI index are PowerShares DB Oil ETF (DBO) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 3x (ERX).  One ETF that trades the opposite of the XOI index is the Direxion Daily Energy Bear 3x (ERY).

The Real Heavy Hitters of the Dow

On January 5, 2015, Yahoo!Finance published an article titled “CAT Crushing the Dow” in which it indicated:

“Caterpillar (CAT) is getting smacked down by nearly 4% adding considerably to the Dow's (^DJI) pain. The earth moving machine maker was downgraded to underweight from neutral by analysts atJPMorgan (JPM).  The team notes that crude is now down some 50% and that's probably going to be a headwind for companies like CAT that make machines that in part help other companies find oil. Beware of obvious downgrades in skittish tapes.”

On the surface, the fact that CAT ultimately closed down –5.28% clearly impacted the Dow.  In fact, CAT was the stock that had the largest percentage decline of all the stocks in the index.  However, looking at the stocks that are part of the Dow Jones Industrial Average and noting that it is a price weighted index we can easily see that far from “…adding considerably to the Dow’s pain…”, CAT was merely a footnote in the decline of the index.

Below is the ranking of the Dow stocks from the most impact to the least for January 5, 2015.

Symbol Name Price pt. decline % decline % impact on Dow
V Visa Inc. 259.17 -5.85 -2.21% 20.72%
GS Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. 188.34 -6.07 -3.12% 11.05%
MMM 3M Company 160.36 -3.7 -2.26% 7.94%
IBM IBM 159.51 -2.55 -1.57% 7.81%
BA Boeing Company 129.05 -0.9 -0.69% 5.06%
UTX United Technologies 113.12 -1.92 -1.67% 3.92%
CVX Chevron Corporation 108.08 -4.5 -4.00% 3.67%
TRV Travelers Companies, Inc. 104.17 -1.27 -1.20% 3.32%
JNJ Johnson & Johnson 103.79 -0.73 -0.70% 3.27%
HD Home Depot, Inc. 101.26 -2.17 -2.10% 3.16%
UNH UnitedHealth Group 99.12 -1.66 -1.65% 3.01%
NKE Nike, Inc. 93.5 -1.53 -1.61% 2.68%
DIS Disney Company 92.38 -1.37 -1.46% 2.62%
MCD McDonald's Corp. 92.23 -1.03 -1.10% 2.60%
AXP American Express Company 90.56 -2.46 -2.64% 2.54%
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation 90.29 -2.54 -2.74% 2.53%
PG Procter & Gamble Company 90.01 -0.43 -0.48% 2.46%
CAT Caterpillar Inc. 87.03 -4.85 -5.28% 2.41%
WMT Wal-Mart Stores Inc. 85.65 -0.25 -0.29% 2.22%
DD du Pont de Nemours 71.72 -1.99 -2.70% 1.59%
JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. 60.55 -1.94 -3.10% 1.14%
MRK Merck & Co. Inc. 58.04 0.85 1.49% 1.00%
VZ Verizon Communications Inc. 46.57 -0.39 -0.83% 0.66%
MSFT Microsoft Corporation 46.33 -0.43 -0.93% 0.65%
KO Coca-Cola Company 42.14 0 0.00% 0.54%
INTC Intel Corporation 35.95 -0.41 -1.13% 0.39%
T AT&T, Inc. 33.55 -0.32 -0.94% 0.34%
PFE Pfizer Inc. 31.16 -0.17 -0.54% 0.30%
CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. 27.06 -0.55 -1.99% 0.22%
GE General Electric Company 24.6 -0.46 -1.84% 0.19%

Of the 30 stocks, CAT was ranked 18th in terms of impact on the decline in the index.  This is a far cry from dragging the Dow lower.  What is most interesting is that the decline of Boeing (BA) had nearly four times the impact on the index than did CAT even though BA declined only -0.69%. 

What investors really don’t want or need is for the first five stocks (V, GS, MMM, IBM, BA) to have a bad day at the same time as these stock comprise 52% of the Dow’s movement.

Best Buy’s New Normal

On January 17, 2014, we posted Edson Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines for Best Buy (BBY) in an attempt to determine what the extent of the decline might be.  From that posting we said the following:

“Best Buy has had a history of resting [at] the extreme downside target, currently at $14.78.  However, we have split the difference and placed an intermediate downside support level of $22.34.  Again, this is not a recommendation to buy or sell Best Buy, instead, it is an attempt to observe how closely the stock will adhere to the SRLs indicated in the chart.”

image 

Nearly one year later, we can see that although the historical trend had been for BBY to decline to the extreme downside target ( at $14.78), the estimate of $22.34 was a fair assessment of downside risk as the stock has managed to vacillate at or above the ascending $22.34 level seen below.

image

The quality of Gould’s SRL has been fairly consistent and reasonably accurate.  We look forward to introducing additional SRLs of stocks that have established a declining trend to determine downside targets.  The conservative upside target for BBY is $44.85.

Gold Stock Indicator: January 2, 2015

Overall, a quiet couple of weeks for gold and gold stocks as represented by the gold ETF and XAU index, respectively.

image

Continue reading

2015 Estimated Price Changes for Dow Industrials

Below are the estimated price changes for the components of the Dow Jones Industrial Average in the coming year.  The price estimates are based on the current analyst low expectation of annual earnings assuming the stock retains the p/e ratio at the end of 2014.

image

Our experience has been that stocks that are expected to underperform generally do much better than those stocks that are expected to increase in the coming year.

As a test, we’re comparing the performance of the “end of 2014 p/e ratio” against the performance of the stocks if they all had a p/e ratio of 15 as depicted below.

image