Category Archives: Bitcoin

Ethereum Seeks Footing at Lower Levels

On February 16, 2018, we said the following of Ethereum:

“Failure of the price of Ethereum to achieve the $1,040.05 by a substantial amount ($1,111 or more) would be an indication that the price will retest the $695.08 level.  A retest of the $695.08 level without falling below the level would be constructive for a new bull market. It would be a second failure to decline below the $692.99 level.  According to Dow Theory, this would one of the most constructive bullish indications going forward. Alternatively, if Ethereum fell below $692.99 then the expectation is that $617.09 is the minimum downside target.”

Unfortunately, Ethereum did not managed to exceed the $1,040.05 level.  In addition to achieving the $695.08 level, Ethereum has fallen below the conservative downside target of $617.09, as mentioned in our February 5, 2018 posting. 

Continue reading

Bitcoin Upside Targets

Like Ethereum, Bitcoin is rebounding nicely from the February 5, 2018 low.  Below are the upside targets for Bitcoin:

Crypto Myth and Market Reality

The Myth

The prevailing theory is that the cause of the decline in cryptocurrencies lately is that the “banks” and Wall Street want to undermine the market for decentralized currencies to either steal the technology like the record industry and Apple (AAPL) did with Napster, or to eliminate a viable competitor to the Wall Street and banking industry cabal.

The Reality

The reality is that, like the introduction of every new technology that turned out to be revolutionary and widely dispersed to the point that it became second nature in its use and profound in it’s application, the price/value of such technologies is only relevant to the use.

In the formative stages (right now), blockchain technology is trying to find its footing in the world.  Make no mistake that blockchain is here to stay and it will likely permeate everyone’s lives, like it or not.  However, as with the canal, railroad, airplane, automobile, computer, biotechnology, and internet bubbles before, there will be thousands of contenders but only a dozen survivors (at most).  The risk of loss is significant when there are more than a thousand different cryptos out there and we all know there should be two dozen, at best.

The Market Reality

Everyone loves a great conspiracy theory.  However,  The last week of market volatility is proof that when everyone wants to sell, it doesn’t matter what they are holding.  Take for example the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) and Bitcoin (BTC).  The chart below shows the hourly percentage change in BTC  (cryptocurrency) versus the DJIA (Wall Street/bankers) from January 30, 2018 to February 5, 2018.

image

In the last week, it should be more difficult for someone to make the claim that Wall Street is pushing down cryptocurrencies while at the same time, Wall Street is falling as well. 

Our take on the matter is actually quite the opposite of the conspiracy theory, if Wall Street can continue to rise, there will be more money and enthusiasm to fund hair-brained ideas within the crypto space.  However, when the money drains out of Wall Street, it will also drain out of all the cool ventures that support and ensure the organic growth of the crypto environment and at a ridiculous rate.

The question might come up as to why BTC is crashing more than the DJIA if everyone is selling in all markets.  In a nutshell, familiarity.  The DJIA has been around for more than 120 years.  BTC has been around for less than 10 years.  Anyone unfamiliar with the risks of a new venture is naturally going to be more skittish when the old line investment (DJIA) is crashing, on a relative basis, and therefore would put into question the more dubious blockchain ventures, this in spite of blockchain technology possibly becoming bigger than the concept of money as we know it.

In Closing

As indicated above, cryptocurrency investors should embrace the idea that a rising stock market allows more money to go into more wasteful, and potentially lucrative, ventures in the blockchain universe than a falling stock market.  Just for the sake of better understanding the point we’re trying to make, get a copy of the book F’d Companies: Spectacular Dot-com Flameouts by Philip J. Kaplan.  You’d be surprised to know that even though there are some ridiculous concepts for dot-com companies, there are still many that would be incredibly lucrative today if the stock market didn’t crash like it did from 2000-2003.

Ethereum: Downside Targets

In a previous posting titled “Goldman Plays with Numbers,” we did a side-by-side comparison between Bitcoin and Ethereum in two different periods.  The periods in question happens to have the same percentage change, approximately +13,400%.

image

As with the same percentage increase, it is reasonable to expect the same percentage decreased that followed.  For the price of Bitcoin, it plunged –93.07% from June 8, 2011 to November 18, 2011.  Below is our charting of three scenarios for downside risk to Ethereum.

image

Based on the work of Edson Gould, the conservative downside target for Ethereum is at $617.09 (blue line).  However, due to the extremely volatile nature of cryptocurrencies, we have to expect that the extreme downside target is more than likely.  The purpose of putting the conservative downside target at all is to demonstrate that it will be achieved after a given peak in price is established and the trend is clearly to the downside.

In addition to the conservative downside target, we have indicated the level Ethereum would be at if it lost –93% (red line) as Bitcoin did in the period from June 2011 to November 2011 (yeah, it took only five months).  Such a decline in Ethereum would bring the price to $96.95.  We don’t expect this but must be realistic about the prospects regardless of our own personal expectations.

Finally, we have included our own worst case scenario (green line) based on one half the difference between Gould’s extreme downside target at $461 and the –93% experienced by Bitcoin in 2011.  This would bring the price of Ethereum to $279.31.  Although this seems like a dire call for Ethereum, in reality it is not unusual to see an –80% decline in price from such extreme parabolic moves.  Additionally, we don’t expect Ethereum to succumb to the same amount of pressure that Bitcoin did as the concept of blockchain technology is more salient to the general public today than it was in 2011.

Bitcoin: February 5, 2018

If you’re holding Bitcoin at this point, it is because you are confortable with the projected downside target of $6,684.31 to $5,802.91.

image

Since December 22, 2017, Bitcoin has had these downside targets.  Worth noting is that the rise from the low to the December 2017 peak is equal to the 2011 low to the 2013 peak on a percentage basis.  We’re within striking distance of the exact same percentage decline from the April 2013 peak to the July 2013 low.

image

In the period after the 2013 peak, it is worth noting the “Dow Theory” retest of the 68.36 low at the 66.86 level.  This indicates that whenever the current ultimate low is achieved, there will be an initial spike, not to exceed half of the prior decline, then another decline back to the established low. 

Traders will make lots of money on this “dead cat” bounce.  Alternatively, those willing to accept the downside risk will know they can buy again at a preferable low without all the hysteria attached.

Bitcoin: February 1, 2018

On December 22, 2017, we said the following of Bitcoin:

  • “We believe that there is going to be limited upside in the near term.”
  • “We think that the conservative downside target ($6,884.31) will be achieved before a new high is seen.”
  • “In all prior booms, the subsequent bust AVERAGED –70% (data found here).”

Below is the updated chart for Bitcoin along with our expected downside target.

Goldman Plays with Numbers

On MarketWatch.com we saw the following article:

image

In the article, it quotes Goldman Sachs analysts as saying, “We also believe that cryptocurrencies have moved beyond bubble levels in financial markets, and even beyond the levels seen during the Dutch ‘tulipmania’ between 1634 and early 1637.”

In addition to concerns about bitcoin, the article highlights cool charts that compare Ether to previous bubbles, as seen below.

image

We thought, if Goldman Sachs can play with numbers then why can’t we?  So we decided to pit the price rise in Bitcoin from April 23, 2011 to April 9, 2013 with the price rise in Ethereum from January 11, 2017 to January 24, 2018.  We just wanted to see the two periods back to back.

image

Playing with the numbers is fun because we picked a period that Goldman has chosen to overlook to compare Ethereum to.  It turns out, if you don’t know the history of Bitcoin and other relevant bubbles, then you’ll miss the last time they probably got it wrong.  The importance of this chart is that perspective matters.

We know that the bubble will bust at some point, the purpose of this piece is to demonstrate that what isn’t shown can be as important as what is shown.

Bitcoin: January 2018

On December 22, 2017, we said the following of Bitcoin:

  • “We believe that there is going to be limited upside in the near term.”
  • “We think that the conservative downside target ($6,884.31) will be achieved before a new high is seen.”
  • “In all prior booms, the subsequent bust AVERAGED –70% (data found here).”

Below is an updated review of Bitcoin and our thoughts for the price going forward.

Bitcoin December 2017: Downside Targets

“A mob’s a monster; heads enough, but no brains.” –Benjamin Franklin

Bitcoin Downside Target

“The four most expensive words in the English language are ‘this time is different.” –John Templeton

image

Continue reading

Bitcoin: November 2017

On October 13, 2017, when Bitcoin was quoted at $5,640, we said the following:

“We are throwing in the towel on taking the $7,166.29 [our upside target] figure, and any future upside targets that go uncorrected to the tune of –50% or more, as something we can feel confident is worth the speculation.”

Our upside target of $7,166.29 has come and gone.  Now comes our updated downside targets for those mindful of the risks.

Bitcoin: Upside Targets Achieved, Now What?

If anyone has managed to follow our work on the topic of Bitcoin, we can only lay claim to the October 7, 2014 call for “Speculators to Unite” when the cryptocurrency was priced at $334.09.  At the time, we said the following:

“…bitcoin is worth the plunge.  Based on the revised price peak of $1,147.25, bitcoin has a conservative upside target price of $723.34 and an extreme upside target of $1,446.68.”

Since October 7, 2014, we have issued revised upside targets and downside targets that have been generally within the range of expectation.  Our last published upside target for Bitcoin was $6,260.91 as seen in the September 5, 2017 posting titled “Bitcoin: Setting the Stage.”  The graphical representation of the price of Bitcoin since October 7, 2014 is staggering and worth a refresher view.

image

At this point, as Bitcoin sits within 7% of the last published target, we cannot take seriously the updated target that has been generated ($7,166.29) based on our Speed Resistance Line calculations.  We are throwing in the towel on taking the $7,166.29 figure, and any future upside targets that go uncorrected to the tune of –50% or more, as something we can feel confident is worth the speculation.

Continue reading

Crypto Bubble? What Makes You Say That?

In a graphic provided by the cost information website HowMuch.net, there is a eye opening review of crypto currencies compared to well known companies like Facebook,PayPal, and others. 

image

On one side are companies providing services that seems to be increasing in demand. PayPal is an online payment system, Expedia is an online travel agency, Zillow is an online real estate resource, Brighthouse Financial is an insurance company, Groupon is an e-commerce marketing company.  On the other side, there are five different crypto currencies.

There is no way that so many cryptocurrencies can exist, simply to do the same thing.  There will have to be winners and losers.  This reminds us about the market share of cell/smart phones and the change that occurred over time.  In our November 7, 2010 article titled “Market Price and Market Share” we highlighted how much the cell phone market change from the the peak of the dot-com bubble to 2010.  In that time, the top cell phone makers (now called “smart” phones) changed in unexpected ways.

Top Mobile Phone Vendors 1999
Vendor market share
Nokia 32.00%
Qualcomm 14.80%
Ericsson 12.70%
Motorola 11.20%
Audiovox 7.40%
Samsung 6.70%
Sony 6.60%
source: RCR. July 5, 1999. Dataquest Inc. page 1. 
Top Mobile Phone Vendors 2010
Vendor 3Q market share
Nokia 32.40%
Samsung 21.00%
LG Electronics 8.30%
Apple 4.10%
R.I.M. 3.60%
Others 30.50%
Total 99.90%
Source: IDC Worldwide Quarterly Mobile Phone Tracker, October 28, 2010
Top Mobile Phone Vendors 2016
Vendor 3Q market share
Samsung 20.00%
Apple 12.50%
Huawei 9.30%
OPPO 7.00%
Vivo 5.80%
Others 45.40%
Total 100.00%
Source: IDC Worldwide Quarterly Mobile Phone Tracker, October 26, 2016

What we always like to point out is that Nokia was the biggest by market share in 1999 and 2010 and yet it wasn’t the most innovative.  Also, in 1999, Apple was nowhere to be found on the list of top five mobile phone vendors and yet it is among the top two today.  Samsung has managed to stay among the top 6 in spite of not having the cache of Apple or (dare we say it) Rimm.

Which brings us back to the cryptocurrencies.  Whoever is on top today is likely to not be a contender down the road.  In fact, we believe that a yet-to-be-determined entrant will likely supplant Bitcoin as the “it” cryptocurrency.  How are we going to find out the latest and greatest cryptocurrency?  It will take a deflation and inflation cycle to get us there. 

For now, keep in mind that there were hundreds of manufacturers of planes, trains, automobiles and mobiles phones before there were the big three.  Deflation of the boom in cryptocurrencies will go a long way towards separating the wheat from the chaff.

Bitcoin: How Much Pain Before Fear Sets In?

Bitcoin is going through the customary pullback in the price.  The new threshold to watch for is –35.77% on the downside.  This was the amount of loss that speculators and investors were willing to accept from the June 11, 2017 high of $3,018.55 to the July 16, 2017 low of $1,938.94 before a new bull run to the upside ensued.  Most traditionalist say that a bear market starts at or near a decline of –20% or more.  At which point, it takes some time before the “investment” gets back to the previous high (example: Nasdaq Composite took 15 years to get back to the 2000 high). 

In this case, we’re not talking about a stodgy technology stock index, we’re talking about a potentially new currency mechanism which will likely supplant many existing currencies.  Bitcoin is only one among many competing to be the final choice of a new money.  However, in order to get that prize, Bitcoin will need to survive the high risk phase of speculative boom and bust.

Right now, we’re watching Bitcoin investors test their tolerance for pain as the price swoons from the high of $4,950.72, as report by Coindesk.com, to the current level of $3,390.  As we said in our August 21, 2017 posting:

“…participants will accept even larger declines if the expectation is that it will exceed the prior peak.  So far, Bitcoin participants accepted a –14.94% decline followed by a –35.76%.  In each instance, these declines were followed by new highs in the price of Bitcoin. By our rationale, Bitcoin will now fall as much as –35% and possibly more as participants become inured to the pain of loss in anticipation of new highs.”

Continue reading

Bitcoin: Setting the Stage

This is all you need to know, Bitcoin is setting the stage for dramatic fireworks.  We’re sticking to our call that “parabolic moves are resolved through dramatic declines. We believe that the conservative downside target of $1,911.83 will be achieved.”  This outrageous claim is not based in hope or fear, it derived for the previous accurate tracking of price declines well in advance of the fall. However, based on the new high at $4,950.72, below we have included updated Speed Resistance Lines for those that are following along with us.