Category Archives: RIMM

Nasdaq 100 Watch List: March 30, 2012

Below are the Nasdaq 100 companies that are within 20% of their respective 52-week lows. Stocks that appear on our watch lists are not recommendations to buy. Instead, they are the starting point for doing your research and determining the best company to buy. Ideally, a stock that is purchased from this list is done after a considerable decline in the price and rigorous due diligence.

Symbol Name Price P/E EPS Yield Price/Book Div/Share % Chg from Low
FSLR First Solar, Inc. 25.05 -0.46 0.6 2.24%
EA Electronic Arts Inc. 16.49 -0.52 2.42 2.71%
CTRP Ctrip.com International Ltd. 21.64 19.29 1.12 2.74 3.00%
APOL Apollo Group Inc. 38.64 8.41 4.6 4.34 4.21%
CHRW CH Robinson Worldwide Inc. 65.49 25 2.62 2.00% 8.48 1.32 5.12%
VOD Vodafone Group plc 27.67 12.75 2.17 3.40% 1.07 0.95 13.82%
SRCL Stericycle, Inc. 83.64 31.09 2.69 5.95 14.50%
ORCL Oracle Corporation 29.16 15.28 1.91 0.80% 3.4 0.24 17.96%
RIMM Research In Motion Limited 14.7 3.46 4.25 0.69 18.07%
GMCR Green Mountain Coffee Roasters Inc. 46.84 24.11 1.94 3.67 18.82%

Watch List Summary*

Update: December 16, 2011 Summary Stocks

Today we’re going to review the price action of the Nasdaq 100 stocks profiled in the summary section of our December 16, 2011 watch list.  First on the list was BMC Software (BMC), we indicated the following about BMC:

  • “If BMC were to replicate the percentage decline from the May 2008 top to the October 2008 low, the stock would decline to a price of $31.11.”
  • “The $40 level seems reasonable within the next year for BMC even though it is 20% above the current price.”

BMC declined from the December 16th price of $33.17 down to the low $31.62 on January 10, 2012.  The actual low of $31.62 was within 1.64% of the projected downside target.  Additionally, BMC managed to close above the $40 level starting on March 26, 2012.

Virgin Media (VMED) was the second stock listed in our summary section.  We projected an initial downside target of $18.29.  This never materialized as the stock reversed its decline at $20.52, we said the following regarding the VMED’s upside target:

  • “The next upside target for VMED is $25.07 which assumes the best case scenario.”

From December 19, 2011 to February 7, 2012 VMED rose as high as $24.49 but struggled to move any higher.  On February 8, 2012, VMED jumped to $25.27 and managed to close as high as $25.93 on February 14, 2012.  This was a gain of +23.77%  in a month and a half.

Ctrip.com (CTRP) was the last stock that we reviewed.  At the time, we said the following about CTRP:

  • “…on a pace to replicate the performance from the high in April 2008 to the low of January 2009 which equaled a loss of -72%. A similar decline in CTRP from the high of $50.57 would bring the price down to $14.16.”
  • “CTRP sits one penny below the 2nd Dow Theory support level of $23.11. Any further deviation below the current price almost ensures that the stock is destined for the $10 range.”

On March 28, 2012, CTRP declined significantly enough below the $22.44 level for us to believe that the stock would fall first to the $14.16 level and possibly to the $10 range.

*Stocks that are in our Watch List Summary section are those that we find the most compelling among all the stocks that appear in the watch list above.

Market Price and Market Share, And Never The Twain Shall Meet

Many companies strive to obtain dominance in market share.  Market share is thought to be the critical element that will propel a company's stock price higher and dominance in an industry.  Unfortunately, that usually isn't the case.  As time moves on, a new company takes a commanding role in a market that they were never thought to be a part of.  Companies that are market leaders today are likely to become failed behemoths in a few years from now.  This is especially true in the technology industry where each new invention is meant to replace all prior technologies by combining all aspects of the old technologies into the new iteration (all things to all people).
In the example below, we show the chart and table of the leaders of the top cellular phone makers in 1999.  While we understand that the industry was in its infancy, it is interesting to see the performance of the respective companies in comparison to their leadership roles in the industry.  In the nearly 11 years since being on the list, none of the original companies have managed to increase their share price beyond their year 2000 highs. Only one company, Qualcomm (QCOM), has managed to increase its share price above the 1999 level.
Below we show the current mobile phone leaders with Nokia (NOK) still in the number one position while Samsung has gone from number 6th ranked in 1999 to number 2 ranked behind Nokia in 2010.

 

 

Top Five Mobile Phone Vendors, Shipments, and Market Share, Q3 2010
Vendor 3Q10 Unit Shipments 3Q10 Market Share 3Q10/3Q09 Change
1. Nokia
110.4
32.40%
1.80%
2. Samsung
71.4
21.00%
18.60%
3. LG Electronics
28.4
8.30%
-10.10%
4. Apple
14.1
4.10%
90.50%
5. R.I.M.
12.4
3.60%
45.90%
Others
103.8
30.50%
28.30%
Total
340.5
100.00%
14.60%
Source: IDC Worldwide Quarterly Mobile Phone Tracker, October 28, 2010
New entrants like LG, Apple (AAPL) and RIM (RIMM) are now vying for whatever portion of market share that they can. However, the focus on market share may not be so good in either the short and long run for their stock prices as represented in the chart above. With this in mind, those investment analysts who make the case that increased market share is justification for why a stock price should be increased or at a premium should review the same claims of similar companies in periods past.
  • Updated mobile data for 1999, 2010, and 2016 available here.

Please revisit New Low Observer for edits and revisions to this post. Email us.