Unemployment Rate: April 2018

In April 3, 2017, we said the following:

“All that is left is for the unemployment rate to fall to 4.40% and 3.80%.  What is the constant challenge to any rising or declining trend?  Getting old and tired.  The manifestation of the declining trend getting old and tired is best represented in the percentage rate of change over the previous year.  When the trend starts on the path of a decelerated rate, you have a fair idea of what is coming.”

image

 

So far, the unemployment rate has declined to 4.10%, an average of the 3.80% and 4.40% that was anticipated last year.  It is no monumental feat to suggest that the unemployment rate could decline from the level of 4.80% to 4.40% in 2017.  However, is something else to suggest that the unemployment rate could get down to 3.80% when it was hovering around 7.50% on July 26, 2013.

Our unvarnished assessment of the unemployment rate in July 2013 was as follows:

“It is important to understand that the 10% and 3.8% unemployment rates are undesirable scenarios.  The 10% unemployment rate is in the depths of a “recession” and the 3.8% unemployment rate at the height of a overextended economic boom.”

As we approach the 3.80% level, it should go without saying that all the signs are in place for an overextended economic boom.  Eight years of economic recovery without a recession indicates that a recession is due.  Below, we attempt to estimate the timing of the next recession based on our April 3, 2017 unemployment review.

Coppock Curve: General Electric

On March 29, 2018, we highlighted General Electric (GE) Altimeter and provided some insight into when to acquire shares. In addition to that analysis, we will apply our knowledge in Coppock Curve to the company to enhance our timing. Continue reading

Dow Altimeter Review: April 2018

Below is the updated Altimeter for the Dow Jones Industrial Average for the 29-year period and the 6-year period.  The Altimeter outlines the range of the DJIA for both the upside and the downside.

Commodity Index Review: April 2018

The market plods along with little in the way of noticeable change from our last posting in February 2018.

Continue reading

Transaction Alert

On April 2, 2018, we executed the following transaction(s):

Continue reading

Ethereum: April 2018

On February 16, 2018, we said the following of Ethereum:

Failure of the price of Ethereum to achieve the $1,040.05 by a substantial amount ($1,111 or more) would be an indication that the price will retest the $695.08 level.  A retest of the $695.08 level without falling below the level would be constructive for a new bull market. It would be a second failure to decline below the $692.99 level.  According to Dow Theory, this would one of the most constructive bullish indications going forward. Alternatively, if Ethereum fell below $692.99 then the expectation is that $617.09 is the minimum downside target.

Unfortunately, Ethereum was unable to exceed $1,040.05 and has met our expectation of $617.09 as the minimum downside target.  As of April 2, 2018, Ethereum is now trading around $384.

Bitcoin: April 2018

On February 17, 2018, we said of Bitcoin:

“…before a new high (substantially above the $19,343) is achieved, we expected a retest of the $6,914.26 level (or something close, like, $7,000-$7,200).”

We will continue to revisit the parts where we got the analysis right because this is where Dow Theory was correctly interpreted.  Below is the charting of the February 5, 2018 low and the subsequent rise and the retest of the low on April 1, 2018.

Y2K: The Top of the Market

In the very first posting for 2018, we covered the prescient comments of Warren Buffett from November 22, 1999 when he said:

“Let me summarize what I've been saying about the stock market: I think it's very hard to come up with a persuasive case that equities will over the next 17 years perform anything like--anything like--they've performed in the past 17. If I had to pick the most probable return, from appreciation and dividends combined, that investors in aggregate--repeat, aggregate--would earn in a world of constant interest rates, 2% inflation, and those ever hurtful frictional costs, it would be 6%. If you strip out the inflation component from this nominal return (which you would need to do however inflation fluctuates), that's 4% in real terms. And if 4% is wrong, I believe that the percentage is just as likely to be less as more (Loomis, Carol. Mr. Buffett on the Stock Market. Fortune. November 22, 1999. accessed: everyday since.).”

In the 17 years since Buffett’s comments, the stock market has gained +2.27% when adjusted for inflation and compounding of dividends.  Even if we included the year 2017 in the picture, the CAGR of the S&P 500 would have been +3.15%.  It is easy to say that Warren Buffett is a genius because, after all, look at the wealth that he has managed to amass.  But what about the regular people out there?  How can they identify a market that has peaked?

One source that we like to cite is the work of the late Richard Russell of Dow Theory Letters (www.dowtheoryletters.com).  In his March 22, 2000 letter, Russell Provided what is known as the “Top Out Parade.”  That Top Out Parade provided much of the indications that the stock market had peaked.  To put the Top Out Parade in perspective, we’ve posted a chart of the Dow Jones Jones Industrial Average indicated in blue the Buffett quote and in red the Russell posting of the Top Out Parade.

image

Both Buffett’s commentary of the expected performance of the market over the next 17 years and Russell’s observation of the Top Out Parade identified keys area in the market that should have been obvious to everyone. 

Below is the original Top Out Parade list as published by Richard Russell on March 22, 2000 in Letter 1298.  We think that anyone who tracks similar data will have a decent idea of whether or not we’ve seen some kind of top in the market, provided the indicators do not make new highs. Enjoy.

Bull Market Ranking

Have we reached the top in the market?  We don’t know.  However, what we do know is that the current market run from March 9, 2009 peaked on January 26, 2018 at 26,616.74 for a gain of +312.66%.  Among the top ten bull market runs, since 1835, this would rank as number four.

image

Oil and Gas Stock Index: March 2018

Below is the updated Oil and Gas Stock Index (XOI) for March 2018 and the performance of the respective fundamental categories.

General Electric Altimeter

Below is the Altimeter for General Electric (GE).  The red arrow on the far right indicates the current level of the Altimeter.

Continue reading

In-Depth Look: U.S. Dividend Watch List March 23, 2018

As a follow up to the watch list we published earlier this week, we will break down the watch list into several components using fundamental criterias. Continue reading

U.S. Dividend Watch List: March 23, 2018

Top Five Watch List Performance Review

In our ongoing review of the NLO Dividend Watch List, we have taken the top five stocks on our list from March 24, 2017 and have checked the performance one year later. The top five companies on that list can be seen in the table below.

Symbol Name 2015 Price 2016 Price % change
TGT Target Corp. 53.12 67.88 27.8%
MAC Macerich 63.87 57.28 -10.3%
SCG SCANA Corporation 66.91 37.26 -44.3%
BMS Bemis Co Inc 48.75 42.54 -12.7%
FII Federated Investors Inc 25.50 32.35 26.9%
      Average -2.5%
         
DJI Dow Jones Industrial 20,596.72 23,533.20 14.3%
SPX S&P 500 2,343.98 2,588.26 10.4%

The average loss of the top five companies was 2.5% compared to gain of 10.4% for the S&P 500. We didn't touch on these five companies but did highlight our bullish sentiment for Hormel (HRL). The stock lost 6% for the year with swing of +/- 10%. Our team continued to believe the valuation and feel that a bottoming process for the stock is in place. In early January, the company announced 10% dividend increase. We continue to hold our long-term call options on the stock which we view as highly speculative.

U.S Dividend Watch List: March 23, 2018

The market lost 6% for the week and propelled the number of companies on our watch list to more than 100 companies. Our team will list all companies below but will expand our coverage by providing top five companies by each fundamental categories such as P/E ratio, Payout Ratio, and our proprietary ratio we'll term NLO ratio. Continue reading

Dogs of the TSX 60: March 2018

This is a performance update to the posting done on December 13, 2017 titled “Dogs of the TSX 60” assuming the stocks listed were bought on December 29, 2017.  That post also included the top three stocks for the respective categories on December 29, 2017 in the comment section.

The first performance review is based on the top ten stocks in the respective categories and compared to the Toronto Stock Exchange.

image

This shows that in spite of the popularity of the concept, “selecting the ten highest yielding stocks and holding for a year…,” the performance of the dogs (highest yielding) has been subpar since December 29, 2017.  The categories that have beat the TSX are low price-to-book, low price-to-earnings, and low dividend yield.  This has been consistent since we started running these numbers.  As we said in our review of the July 7, 2016 Canadian Business article titled “Blue chips at a bargain? Meet the 10 ‘Dogs of the TSX’” :

“Note that all of the low categories performed better while all the high categories performed the worst.  This has been borne out in the few Canadian Dividend Watch List performance reviews that we’ve done so far.”

In our February 2018 Canadian Dividend Watch List we said the following:

“If the goal is the beat the performance of the Toronto Stock Exchange then we believe that the consideration of the ‘low yield’ category might be worth considering.”

When we look at the top three Canadian Dogs of the TSX 60 from December 29, 2017 to March 22, 2018 (on a total return basis), we find the following performance.

image

 

Low yield managed to beat the TSX, however, both of the other “low” categories underperformed the TSX.  High p/e and high p/b out-performed the TSX.  However, as we mentioned in the February 2018 posting, we’d opt for the low yield stocks to out-perform the TSX over the remaining year. Again, high yield (dogs of the TSX 60) managed to linger as the worst performing on a consistent basis.

Transaction Alert

On March 22, 2018, we executed the following transactions: