Question:
I hope this give a little more insight about our approach. Thanks again for a great question.
-Touc
Question:
I hope this give a little more insight about our approach. Thanks again for a great question.
-Touc
Comments Off on Q & A
Posted in Q and A, Richard Russell
Our experience has been that, provided the company has a history of dividend payments (something that cannot be manipulated through accounting methods) and all other financials attributes being in order, the company is put on a list to be acquired at the earliest opportunity. A great book that summarizes our general approach is "Dividends Don't Lie" by Geraldine Weiss and the upcoming book "Dividends Still Don't Lie" by Kelly Wright. In these books the main idea is that quality stock tend to trade in a price range based on the dividend yield.
Question:
Question:
I hope the above explanations have peaked your interest in the basics of investing. Much of what we have pointed out about considering the purchase of stocks is rooted in being reluctant participants of a consumer society. However, we have transferred the same skills as consumers of liabilities to the acquisition of assets. I hope you have time to read the book "Dividends Don't Lie" through your local library (save some money) until the new book comes out next year. Touc.
On Friday August 21, 2009, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (^DJI) exceeded the prior high of 9398.19 set on Wednesday August 12th. Unfortunately, the Dow Jones Transportation Index (^DJT) are lagging in the ability to exceed the high of 3774.12 set on Thursday August 13th. The only thing that favors the Transports in this instance is the fact that on a percentage basis the Transports rose 2.58% versus the Industrials 1.67% increase. This indicates that there is relatively strong interest in the Transports. Hopefully this enthusiasm will spill over into today's trading.
If the Transports do not break above the August 13th high then we might be on track for a non-confirmation. A non-confirmation means that the recent upward trend in the market will be coming to an end soon. Conversely, if the Transports break the indicated high while the Industrials move moderately higher then we could be in good shape for the short term.
Dow Theory Q & A
Q.When looking at a chart with weekly Dow prices, how is the weekly price calculated? Is it the Friday close or is it an average of the whole weeks close?
A. In all my readings of Dow Theory, I cannot remember anyone suggesting the use of weekly data for analysis. This doesn't mean that weekly data isn't useful, you might see a consistent pattern that I would otherwise overlook. Dow Theory is supposed to be calculated by using the closing price for both indices on a daily basis. I have bastardized Dow Theory by taking the high and low price of a given period as a way to get a sense of herd mentality or market psychology. This is in contrast to taking only the closing price.
Depending on the source, weekly data is calculated using the opening price from the open on Monday, the high and low price is from whichever days in the week that had either number and the closing price from the Friday close. An average of the week isn't how the weekly closing price is calculated. Touc.
Please revisit Dividend Inc. for editing and revisions to this post.
Comments Off on Dow Theory
Posted in Dow Theory, Dow Theory Non confirmation, Q and A
A: First, the crisis is past us and now we're faced with sorting through the wreckage which is more painful than the actual crisis itself. The general public now has the taste of bitterness necessary to feel that maybe there is a difference between saving and investing or the distinction between investing and speculating. The public now knows, by force of nature, that a home is a place where you live and not an investment. These realities, which faded after the Dow first hit 10,000, are in the recesses of the collective subconscious. While the lessons will be quickly forgotten, reminders will reappear in stark contrast to the hopes of the ever optimistic public.
In many of my postings and in the right hand column of my site you'll see that I expect this to be a bear market for at least the next 7 to 9 years. My 2016 date (based on cycle analysis) is the approximate year that I expect that either the market will hit its ultimate low or the point when valuations are expected to be at the most extreme low levels. Even after the year 2016 I do not expect the market to immediately go to new highs. Instead I expect that the market will meander for another 6-8 years before exceeding the previous high for good.
Within the context of a secular bear market there will be cyclical bull markets or bear market rallies. Great examples of the kind of market action that I expect are years from 1906-1924 or 1966-1982. Remember, a secular bull market has the ability to exceed the previous market high by at least 16.5%.
We will see a period when valuation are at historical low levels. Unfortunately, it will be very difficult to convince the retail investor that buying stocks en mass is the right thing to do. As an example, 1982 was a great year to buy stocks but with treasuries yielding 12% there was no way to convince the public that the Dow with a yield of 5.5% was worth it. Guaranteed money at 10-12% versus stocks at 5% seemed like a no-brainer.
A: I believe that we'll see earnings remain flat as corporations continue to cut costs but the shocker will be that we'll see earnings. The problem will be that corporations will cut costs too much which will lead to a general rise in prices and an increase in the value of corporate assets. Chapter 2 of the book Dow 3000 by Thomas Blamer and Richard Shulman clearly explains what most investors forget at the end of a bear market. Essentially, companies will become more valuable even though the stock price and earnings don't go anywhere.
"Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one."
Posted in Q and A