Dogs of the Dow: 1994

In our continued pursuit to gather data that contradicts our view that low yield stocks outperform the high yield stocks (aka Dogs of the Dow) as presented in Michael O’Higgins’ book Beating the Dow, we have obtained the performance of the top ten, top five, top three and the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th stocks in the high and low yield groups then contrasted their performance against the Dow Jones Industrial Average for the same year.

In this case, the year under consideration is 1994 and we have added the list of ten stocks and their price with the dividend yield.

image


1994 Data Breakdown

image

After reviewing the data and adjusting for splits, the Dogs of the Dow (High Yield stocks) again underperformed the Low Yield stocks.

Average Return 1991-1994

image

On average, from 1991 to 1994, the Low Yield stocks continue to outpace the Index and the High Yield (Dogs of the Dow) stocks at more than double the rate.

see also:

1920-2020: New York Times Inflation Reference Index

Below is the annual New York Times Inflation references from January 1920 to 2020.

image

See also:

Rising Secular Trend in Interest Rates

As we have long advocated, the declining trend in interest rates is coming to an end and the secular trend in rates is up.  To provide a decent level of analysis on what might happen going forward, we have a comparison of the Dow Jones Industrial Average to the 3-month Treasury from 1934 to the peak in May 1981.

image

Conventional wisdom says that as interest rates rise then stocks should underperform.  However, when contrasted to the interest rate sensitive Dow Jones Utility Average, we see that the index increased +1,321% from the April 1942 low to the March 1965 peak.

We contrast the change in the Dow Jones Utility Average to the 3-month Treasury to highlight what happened to the price of Silver in the same secular trend.

image

Historically, it is understood that rising interest rates mean rising commodity prices.  In the last secular trend, the price of silver increased modestly until, in the late stage of the cycle, all commodity prices go wild.  We believe that such a trend is likely to occur again.

Our general conclusion on the secular trend in rising interest rates is that the best alternative in the initial stages is stocks and commodities in late stage of the same trend.

For the past 25 years the commodity market and the stock market have moved almost exactly together. The index number representing many commodities rose from 88 in 1878 to 120 in 1881. It dropped back to 90 in 1885, rose to 95 in 1891, dropped back to 73 in 1896, and recovered to 90 in 1900. Furthermore, index numbers kept in Europe and applied to quite different commodities had almost exactly the same movement in the same time. It is not necessary to say to anyone familiar with the course of the stock market that this has been exactly the course of stocks in the same period ( source: Dow, Charles H. Review and Outlook. Wall Street Journal.February 21, 1901.)”

Margin Debit-Credit: August 2020

Below is the Year-Over-Year percentage change data from FINRA’s Margin Statistics.

image

see also: Margin Debit-Credit August 2019

Dogs of the Dow: 1993

In our continued pursuit to gather data that contradicts our view that low yield stocks outperform the high yield stocks (aka Dogs of the Dow) as presented in Michael O’Higgins’ book Beating the Dow, we have obtained the performance of the top ten, top five, top three and the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th stocks in the high and low yield groups then contrasted their performance against the Dow Jones Industrial Average for the same year.

In this case, the year under consideration is 1993 and we have added the list of ten stocks and their price with the dividend yield.

image


1993 Data Breakdown

image

This is the first year where High Yield stocks (Dogs of the Dow) exceeded the returns of the Low Yield stocks.

Average Return 1991-1993

image

The average return for the period from December 31, 1990 to December 31, 1993 continues to show the Low Yield stocks exceeding the index in each grouping.  However, the High Yield stocks are gaining ground with the top ten stocks failing to prove their ability to beat the Index.

see also:

Digital Realty Trust Inc. (DLR) Q2 2020

image

Industry representatives say that steadiness of AFFO is more reflective of a REIT’s health.  For the purposes of determining the future direction of the stock price, we prefer the wide variability of the net income figure. (data source)

see also:

Dogs of the Dow: 1992

In our continued pursuit to gather data that contradicts our view that low yield stocks outperform the high yield stocks (aka Dogs of the Dow) as presented in Michael O’Higgins’ book Beating the Dow, we have obtained the performance of the top ten, top five, top three and the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th stocks in the high and low yield groups then contrasted their performance against the Dow Jones Industrial Average for the same year.

In this case, the year under consideration is 1992 and we have added the list of ten stocks and their price with the dividend yield.

image


1992 Data Breakdown

image

For the second year in a row, the top ten stocks in the high yield category underperformed the Dow Jones Industrial Average AND the low yield category.

Average Return 1991-1992

image

The average return for the period from December 31, 1990 to December 31, 1992 highlights the strength of the low yield stocks.  However, for the top ten high yield stocks, they could not outperform the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

see also:

Digital Realty Trust Inc. (DLR) Q1 2020

image

Industry representatives say that steadiness of FFO is more reflective of a REIT’s health.  For the purposes of determining the future direction of the stock price, we prefer the wide variability of the net income figure. (data source)

see also:

A Strategy For the Coppock Curve

On, August 1, 2020, we said the following:

“Last month, the Coppock Curve dipped into negative territory flagging us to closely monitor this indicator for a buy signal. In addition to monitoring the Dow Jones Industrial Average, we created a model to back test this strategy against individual stocks. So far, we are very satisfied with the outcome.”

Based on our prior work, we have developed a strategy to compliment the indications made by the Coppock Curve when applied to the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Continue reading

Dogs of the Dow: 1991

In our continued pursuit to gather data that contradicts our view that low yield stocks outperform the high yield stocks (aka Dogs of the Dow) as presented in Michael O’Higgins’ book Beating the Dow, we have obtained the performance of the top ten, top five, top three and the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th stocks in the high and low yield groups then contrasted their performance against the Dow Jones Industrial Average for the same year.

In this case, the year under consideration is 1991 and we have added the list of ten stocks and their price with the dividend yield.

image


1991 Data Breakdown

image

The data should be considered amazing because the exceptional yield that is offered by the high yield stocks (Dogs of the Dow) an investor generally foregoes nearly double the return.  Also notice that the high yield stocks had 4 of the ten companies on their list that failed (bankruptcy, forced liquidation) while only one company in ten on the low yield list has failed (so far).

see also:

Silver Review

On August 25, 2019, we said the following of silver:

“The trend is up, what remains are the buying opportunities (based on the upside targets above) and a lot of patience.”

Since that time, silver has had the following price action.

image

Clear buying opportunities have opened up in the intervening period from August 2019 to the July 2020 period.  In addition, our point that precious metals prices decline during stock market declines has continued to hold up as highlighted in our articles published on November 8, 2008 and September 14, 2014.  The mistaken belief that precious metals are the place to be if the stock market “crashes” because they act as a hedge, meaning generally increase, is mistaken.

Our next update on the price of silver will review the upside resistance targets so that those interested in the precious metal can be more selective of where they plan to initiate positions.  We hope to continue the tradition of providing the least expensive lesson on the behavior of precious metals.

Coppock Curve: July 2020

Last month, the Coppock Curve dipped into negative territory flagging us to closely monitor this indicator for a buy signal. In addition to monitoring the Dow Jones Industrial Average, we created a model to back test this strategy against individual stocks. So far, we are very satisfied with the outcome. Below is the current status of this indicator when we apply it to the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Continue reading

GDP and Market: July 2020

This is an update January 16, 2020 comparison of the Gross Domestic Product and the Wilshire 5000 on a quarterly basis from 1975 to Q2 2020.

image

It seems that the decline in GDP has run its course.  Alternatively, if the decline has not ended then there is not much more to go on the downside.

Meanwhile, it is challenging to think that the Wilshire 5000 does not have more to go on the downside.  However, the sudden nature of the cause in the decline and the extent of chasm that has been attained may mean that the worst is past us, buy only for those who are willing to take a 10 to 15 year investment horizon.  Traders who are long only may see more pain ahead.

see also: January 2020

Transaction Alert

We executed the following transaction(s): Continue reading

Hang Seng Index: July 2020

On October 5, 2019, we said the following of the Hang Seng Index:

“By all accounts, the failure of the Hang Seng Index to meaningfully exceed the 23,264.43 level indicates that the range of 24,585.53 to 21,616.14 is a lock.”

As seen in the chart below, the Hang Seng Index achieved a low of 21,696.13 on March 23, 2020.

image

There is more room for downside risk, as plainly seen in the Dow Theory target of 19,967.86.  Hand over fist buying should be considered at levels below the ascending 19,967.86 trend line.

see also: