National Buyers Remorse

On February 13, 2024, it was reported that the nation of Zimbabwe had accumulated approximately a ton of gold. 

image

In this posting, we’ll address the elephant in the room on how that gold was accumulated.

“The Central Bank in Zimbabwe has accumulated nearly a ton of gold since introducing a law that forces mining companies to pay part of their royalties using gold.”

Suffice to say, any nation that successfully manages to extract gold from companies operating within their nation usually begin to asked for more and more, in violation of previous agreements.  Whether the strategy is right or wrong is immaterial to the overall trend that emerges.  The usual history of these kinds of agreements tend to take place after it is realized exactly how much money the companies are making in the business of extracting resources and the country believes that they have made agreements that they wish to rescind or change.

Let’s look at the typical pattern for how a nation goes from a simple agreement to a form of bureaucratic buyers remorse.

The example of Chile is the best most recent example.  In the case of Chile, it allowed private companies to mine Lithium.  However, as global demand for Lithium increased, the government of Chile decided that they wanted to control the level of production or gain greater profits from the high level of demand. 

image

Previously viable companies in the business of extracting Lithium began to see their share prices drop as the potential impact was immediately transmitted to the markets.

image

However, it is worth noting that Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) had already been in decline after the May 22, 2022 peak.  However, the Chilean government talk of nationalization was just another blow to an already faltering stock price.

As we frequently point out, where a trend begins transmits far more information than any point along the way up or down.  In the case of SQM, the May 2022 peak in the stock price was an indication that Lithium was on the way down (a basic tenet of Dow Theory).

image

Notice that the stock price transmitted the coming peak (saturated market) for Lithium in spite of the fact that Lithium prices moved higher after May 2022. Finally, in April 2023, Chile talks of nationalization at the time when it is apparent that demand is on the decline. 

Most nations embark on a nationalization scheme during a glut and find that the hoped for gains don’t materialize.

Zimbabwe’s “accumulation” of gold will likely follow the same path that we’ve seen throughout history.  As prices start to rise (and maybe not, in the case of gold), the government will want increased payments.  Those increased payment demands will effectively shut down the industry and kill the golden goose. Those celebrating the increase of gold holdings will not see their hopes fulfilled with similar actions.

See also:

U.S. Dividend Watch List: February 16, 2024

Despite a quick rise to start the new year for the S&P 500, the major index was flat this week. YTD, the market risen 5.5%. There are number of high quality companies on our watch list to consider. Below is the watch list for this week. Continue reading

Twitter Tape: AirBnB, Bust or Bubble?

Is the Airbnbust real?

Continue reading

Super Micro Computer Downside Targets

This posting will cover the downside targets for Super Micro Computer Inc. (SMCI) using Edson Gould’s Speed Resistance Targets.

Continue reading

Newmont Mining Price Momentum Indicator

Below we review the Price Momentum for Newmont Mining from 1982 to 2024 under various scenarios.

Continue reading

Nike (NKE) Price Momentum

Below is a chart of Nike (NKE) from 1990 to 2024, reflecting Price Momentum data. Continue reading

Barrick Gold (GOLD) Price Momentum

Below is Barrick Gold (GOLD) from 1990 to 2024 applying the Price Momentum Indicator. Continue reading

Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) Price Momentum

Below is Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) from 1990 to 2024 applying the Price Momentum Indicator. Continue reading

Interest Rates and Central Banks

On February 13, 2024, we received a thoughtful response from Hanif Bayat to a comment that we made about the rise in real estate prices in Canada.

image

This response was preceded by the comment from Hanif Bayat, “Maybe Bank of Canada’s too many rate cuts in 2008, while Canadian home prices didn't crash unlike U.S.”

First and foremost, neither the Bank of Canada or the Federal Reserve of the United States have any say in the direction of interest rates.  Rate policy is dictated by the markets.  The only issue is how long before the central banks respond to the market rates.

We start with the longest running and continuously reported data series [a must for good analysis] on interest rates found at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (FRED).

image

Using the “Monthly, Percent, Not Seasonally Adjusted” (TB3MS) data from January 1934 to January 2024, we can compare that to the “Interest Rates, Discount Rate for United States” (INTDSRUSM193N) data from 1950 to 2021. 

image

The “Interest Rates, Discount Rate for United States” is the actual Federal Reserve response to market rates. 

What you’ll notice between to the two data sets from 1950 and after is that the Federal Reserve never led the directions of interest rates from a prior peak or trough.

image

image

Pick your period and you’ll see the same outcome.  Let’s expand this concept beyond the limited period offered by FRED.

image

If the 90 year history of the data is consistent with the Federal Reserve Bank following the market then we can expand that to the period from 1915 to 1960 for a reasonable period of overlap to confirm the consistency of the claim [THE CLAIM: neither the Bank of Canada or the Federal Reserve of the United States have any say in the direction of interest rates.  Rate policy is dictated by the markets] and the data.

The claim of the Fed holding rates at any level “too long” or “too short” is nullified.  This extends to the Bank of Canada.  Why?

Image

Autonomy of interest rates is a nuanced topic.  However, when we zoom out, we can clearly see that the overall direction of interest rates, on a secular basis, between Canada and the U.S. are joined at the hip.  This confirms the words of Charles H. Dow (co-founder of the Wall Street Journal) in October 1, 1901:

image

For this reason, when we see that the Canadian rate environment following  the same secular trend as the U.S., then we don’t have to worry about whether or not Canada has any control over their rates.  For this reason, the Bank of Canada didn’t hold down rates artificially or too long.

Let’s solidify the idea that central banks have zero say over the secular trend in interest rates. Why? Because we haphazardly referred to the idea earlier but did not nail down the concept.

image

In the 1947 book titled “Cycles: The Science of Prediction”, Edward Dewey and Edwin Dakin present the idea that there would be a peak in inflation and interest rates in 1979.  This assessment is based on the cyclical pattern of rates from 1790 to 1947. In addition to the idea of a peak in 1979 that would be followed by a decline, Dewey had a low set at 2006.  Years of work with cycles has taught us that there will be slippage that pushes out any expected peak or trough. 

Most important to understand about Dewey’s work ( founder, Foundation for the Study of Cycles) is that it was premised on the data from 1790 and earlier.  For the Wholesale Prices from 1790 to 2000 above, the period in red indicates before the modern central bank.

Let’s reinforce the idea that central banks have little impact on the direction of interest rates.  The chart below was generously provided by @WinfieldSmart on Twitter from October 12, 2020. Our update to the chart was to simply indicate the period before the Federal Reserve in red.

image

As can be plainly seen, the direction of interest rates, on average, has been on a vigorous declining trend for the period in question.  That interest rates would possibly go to zero and stay there for an extended period of time should not surprise anyone.

Some have proposed that central bank policy is moving the needle for interest rates in the short term and therefore, they do have an impact on interest rates. More specifically, this claim is often associated with the concept of Quantitative Easing (QE) as a remedy for the housing crisis (GFC).  Let’s put that idea to rest with the following review of the data.

The concept of modern Quantitative Easing (QE) is thanks to the work of the Bank of Japan.  The perceived manipulation of markets with the uses of QE surely must have been the reason that interest rates were held down for so long, right?

image

In a piece by Henry McMillan and Jerome Baesel from 1988, they projected the direction of interest rates from near double digits rates to negative rates by 2008 to 2022.  Remember, this was before the implementation of QE in Japan and the U.S.

Nothing that central banks have done is out of line for what could have been expected from 1988 or 1310.  This brings us to the topic of home prices in Canada.  That will be our follow-up article in the commentary with Hanif Bayat. 

See also:

Idaho Gold?

Three years ago, it was hailed as a second coming and the dawn of a new age.  Hidden underneath was an appeal to the primal instincts of goldphiles everywhere.

On February 13, 2021, Idaho Bill H0007 was passed by 51-19.  The bill states, “Amends existing law to provide that idle moneys may be invested in physical gold and silver in certain instances.” What is most important about this bill is the timing. 

image

It was introduced just after the runup in the price of gold from the late 2015 low.

image

Whoever the legislator is that proposed such a law is keenly aware of the foibles of followers of gold but also doesn’t have the acumen to know when such a law, in the best interests of the citizens, should have been proposed (2015 or 1999).

The law (found here in PDF format) itself reads as a mockery of the concept of gold as money, go on, read it and laugh…

image

The costs of maintaining a facility that is either in state, or in an adjacent state, while the price of gold goes nowhere in the face of mounting inflation really begs the question, to whose benefit is this charade?

See also:

Analyst Estimate: February PMI Stocks

Below are the price projections for the Price Momentum Indicator stocks based on analyst LOW earnings estimates in the coming year.  These stocks can be found on our February 2, 2024 U.S. Dividend Watch List.

Continue reading

Dow & Nikkei Watch

We’re watching with a sense of awe as the Dow Jones Industrial Average and Nikkei 225 Index gravitate toward the same closing price.

image

The last time the two indexes were at or near the same level (on the way up) the Nikkei embarked on an epic boom.

image

This coincides with the apparent inflation cycle that we are entering (versus the disinflation period of 1980-2015).  As we said on SeekingAlpha, the inflationary period was good for Japan and we may see something similar this time around.

image

See also:

Pandemic Roundtrip, Ideal But Not Required

Q: “With respect to your last sentence, more specifically about the stock market, should it not be more consistent to have seen the stock market return to its prepandemic level, like in (1918-)1921 (The Forgotten Depression)?”

A: In almost every economic measure, we have seen what we have called the pandemic roundtrip.  This means seeing a spike or dramatic drop from March 23, 2020 followed a the opposite move from either the peak or trough back to the March 23, 2020 level. A small sampling below.

image

image

image

We have seen this same phenomenon in many, but not all, stocks.  With almost every box checked for what you would see during a pandemic, we believe that the exceptional performance in the stock market is acceptable.  

Our January 29, 2024 posting clarified in detail, based on the Dow Theory, the issue of when a market is rangebound and how it can be more significant than a crash (presumably to the pandemic low point of March 23, 2020).

See also:

The End of Hong Kong?

Some are calling Stephen Roach’s article dated February 11, 2024 in the Financial Times the bottom in the decline for the Hang Seng Index.

image

Dow Theory is very clear on this claim.

image

It appears that we’re seeing a double bottom in the Hang Seng Index.  If the Index can remain above the October 23, 2022 low then we can feel confident about the possibility for a reversal.  However, a decline below the 2022 level will mean more declines should not surprise anyone.

Dow/House Price Index Ratio

On February 11, 2024, we posted the following chart to Twitter:

image

What is our take on this chart?  To find out we had to regenerate the same data to the current period, as seen below:

image

Russell suggests that the chart indicates that the Dow was cheap when at the lows and housing is cheap when the indicator is higher.  Can housing really be that cheap as the ratio continues to climb higher?

We don’t think so.  Instead, we think that the indicator is merely reflecting the inverse relationship with interest rates.   What we should see is the indicator ultimately getting down to the 1980 level as interest rates rise.

This highlights the importance of obtaining a full cycle before drawing any meaningful conclusions.