U.S. Dividend Watch List: May 10, 2019

We saw the market reached an all-time high in the past two weeks. With bullish sentiment back, number of companies trading at or near their low are shrinking. Despite that, keep an eye on the Dow Jones Transport as a key indicator for the next move for the market. Our team believe in the upside bias but we take the wait and see approach before declaring that victory. Our team will utilize the watch list below to seek investments that have imbalance risk/reward profile. Continue reading

Portland General Electric 10-Year Targets

Below are the valuation targets for Portland General Electric (POR) for the next 10 years. Continue reading

Lazard Ltd. 10-Year Targets

Below are the valuation targets for Lazard Ltd. (LAZ) for the next 10 years. Continue reading

Cullen/Frost Bankers 10-Year Targets

Below are the valuation targets for Cullen/Frost Bankers (CFR) for the next 10 years. Continue reading

Evercore Inc. 10-Year Targets

Below are the valuation targets for Evercore Inc. (EVR) for the next 10 years. Continue reading

Webster Financial 10-Year Targets

Below are the valuation targets for Webster Financial Corp. (WBS) for the next 10 years. Continue reading

Coppock Curve: April 2019

The indicator dipped below 100 and closed the month at 62.9. Keep a close watch on this indicator if and when it moves into negative territory. Continue reading

Chart of the Day: Inverted Yields from 1800 to 1965

Below is a chart of inverted yields of American bonds as published in Richard Russell’s Dow Theory Letters on May 25, 1965.  What is most conspicuous about this chart?  The overall trend of lower highs (yields) and lower lows (yields).

image

Nasdaq 100: April 2019

Below are the Nasdaq 100 Watch List stocks for April 2019.

Continue reading

Gilead Sciences 10-Year Targets

Below are the valuation targets for Gilead Sciences (GILD) for the next 10 years. Continue reading

Interest Rate Monitor: April 2019

Below are the downside targets for the 3-month Treasury from the beginning of the Fed’s interest rate increasing campaign. Continue reading

U.S. Dividend Watch List: April 19, 2019

Prior Year Performance Review

In our ongoing review of the NLO Dividend Watch List, we have taken the top five stocks on our list from April 20, 2018 and have checked the performance one year later. The top five companies on that list can be seen in the table below.

Symbol Name 2015 Price 2016 Price % change
PG Procter & Gamble 73.80 106.05 43.7%
ABM ABM Industries 31.75 37.37 17.7%
CL Colgate-Palmolive 67.52 69.35 2.7%
PEP PepsiCo 102.48 127.09 24.0%
HAS Hasbro Inc 82.81 88.78 7.2%
      Average 19.1%
         
DJI Dow Jones Industrial 24,462.94 26,559.54 8.6%
SPX S&P 500 2,670.14 2,905.03 8.8%

The top five companies gained +19.10% outperforming the S&P 500 gain of +8.80% by a wide margin. The largest gain of +43.70% came from Procter & Gamble (PG). One year ago, Procter was trading at 3.70% dividend yield which happens to be in the undervalue range of our 10 year target. Since then the share price has done nothing but rise.

Interestingly, the worst performing company was Colgate-Palmolive (CL) which gained +2.70% and yet these two companies are operating in the same sector. But a closer examination of Colgate one year ago revealed that it was trading closer to its fair value and wasn't undervalued. Of the two companies within the same sector, the one that is trading at discount to historical yield, with a better risk-reward proposition, would be the one to purchase.

U.S. Dividend Watch List: April 19, 2019

Below are 27 companies that are on our watch list this week. Continue reading

Is Qualcomm Finally Untethered?

On April 16, 2019, Qualcomm (QCOM) and Apple (AAPL) agreed to settle their ongoing disputes.  The outcome was significant for Qualcomm.

As Charles H. Dow, co-founder of the Wall Street Journal has said:

“The one sure thing in speculation is that values determine prices in the long run. Manipulation is effective temporarily, but the investor establishes price in the end.  The object of all speculation is to foresee coming changes in values. Whoever knows that the value of a stock has run ahead of price and is likely to be sustained can buy that stock with confidence that as its value is recognized by investors, the price will rise (Dow, Charles H. Review and Outlook.  Wall Street Journal. February 25, 1902.)."

For many years, the market price of QCOM appeared to be reflecting the neglect of speculators.  In the meantime, investors slowly and selectively accumulated shares of QCOM in anticipation of the high risk proposition that QCOM would prevail against AAPL.

As seen in our chart below, QCOM has found its share price at the undervalued level several times since 2016.  The September 13, 2018 announcement of the accelerated share buyback seems as though it was at an elevated prices.  However, as our updated 10-Year price target indicates, the prospects for QCOM are far in excess of current levels.

image

In many respects, the price of Qualcomm has been at the mercy of Apple and their ongoing lawsuits.  However, Charles H. Dow has the following to say of such conditions:

“The manipulator is all-powerful for a time. He can mark prices up or down. He can mislead investors inducing them to buy when he wishes to sell, and to sell, when he wishes to buy; but manipulation in a stock cannot be permanent, and, in the end, the investor learns the approximate truth. His decision to keep his stock or to sell it then makes a price independent of speculation and, in a large sense, indicative of true value (Dow, Charles H. Review and Outlook.  Wall Street Journal. October 18, 1901.).”

We believe that Apple has played into the hands of value investors and we’re thankful for it.  Now the test becomes whether Qualcomm will realize the overvalued targets that we have set for the stock, as seen here.

Casey’s General Stores 10-Year Targets

Below are the valuation targets for Casey’s General Stores (CASY) for the next 10 years. Continue reading

Chart of the Day

The Barron’s Averages (Industrials and Railroads) from 1906 to 1932.

image

The amazing rise from the 1907 low to the 1929 peak was followed by the staggering decline of 1931 and 1932.