Debunked – Death Cross

There are many technical indicators traders and investors utilize in their decision making process. We have been exploring how effective one particular technical pattern is and have some surprising findings to share. The pattern in question is known as the Death Cross. A quick search will reveal the definition(s) of this particular pattern, and for our purpose, we will assume the following definition.

Death Cross - when a short-term moving averages (in our study 50-day) crosses  below the long-term moving averages (in our study 200-day).

Before we go to the data and findings, there are additional assumptions we'd like to lay out.

  1. Sell signal (short selling) is triggered when 50-day moving average crosses 200-day moving average. In our case, we use a simple moving average.
  2. Targeted buy (short covering) is 253 trading days from the date the sell signal is triggered.
  3. The data excludes any signals that occurred 60 trading days prior to the sell signal. For example, if a buy signal was triggered on March 1st and sell signal was triggered on April 1st, we will omit the buy signal since it occurred within the 60 trading days of the first signal. This should eliminate false alarm.

Now that we've laid out the rules, the index we will focus on is the S&P 500. Anyone can replicate our study by downloading the historical price from Yahoo!Finance using the non-adjusted closing price.

According to a prominent investment site, the death cross is a technical pattern indicating a potential for a major selloff. The excerpt below came from the same site.

The death cross indicator has proven to be a reliable predictor of some of the most severe bear markets of the past century: 1929, 1938, 1974, and 2008.

Let's explore how reliable this indicator is. Since inception of S&P 500, we observed 30 instances of the death cross, 8 of which lead to a negative return after 253 trading days. This is a 27% success rate if you short sell the market. On the other hand, 73% of the time the market actually gained value in the same time frame. In our research, we saw an average gain of +6%, maximum gain of +31%, and largest loss at -42%. The table below provide a detail of all 30 transactions.

Date Short Selling Price Buy to Cover Price  % Gain/Loss
5/11/1953 24.91 28.72 15%
10/26/1956 46.27 41.02 -11%
9/26/1957 42.57 49.66 17%
10/30/1959 57.52 53.94 -6%
5/7/1962 66.02 70.01 6%
7/22/1965 83.85 85.41 2%
4/28/1966 91.13 93.84 3%
2/27/1968 90.53 101.02 12%
3/13/1969 98.39 87.29 -11%
9/24/1971 98.15 108.52 11%
4/18/1973 111.54 93.75 -16%
12/1/1976 102.49 94.69 -8%
12/13/1978 96.06 107.67 12%
4/22/1980 103.43 133.94 29%
7/2/1981 128.64 107.65 -16%
2/3/1984 160.91 180.35 12%
11/18/1986 236.78 245.55 4%
11/5/1987 254.48 276.31 9%
2/26/1990 328.67 362.81 10%
9/7/1990 323.40 388.57 20%
4/19/1994 442.54 505.29 14%
9/29/1998 1,049.02 1,282.71 22%
11/4/1999 1,362.64 1,426.69 5%
10/30/2000 1,398.66 1,118.86 -20%
8/18/2004 1,095.17 1,219.02 11%
7/19/2006 1,259.81 1,541.57 22%
12/21/2007 1,484.46 863.16 -42%
7/2/2010 1,022.58 1,337.88 31%
8/12/2011 1,178.81 1,403.93 19%
8/28/2015 1,988.87 2,176.12 9%

We were once a believer of this technical pattern. However, being skeptical of the conventional wisdom coupled with data analysis, we're able to conclude that the Death Cross is not so deadly after all. So the next time you see this term used to instill fear of a impending market crash, be sure to think twice about liquidating all your holdings.

Sources:

Amerisafe 10-Year Targets

Below are the valuation targets for Amerisafe Inc. (AMSF) for the next 10 years. Continue reading

Harley-Davidson 10-Year Targets

Below are the valuation targets for Harley-Davidson (HOG) for the next 10 years. Continue reading

Southwest Gas 10-Year Targets

Below are the valuation targets for Southwest Gas Holdings (SWX) for the next 10 years. Continue reading

Silgan Holdings 10-Year Targets

Below are the valuation targets for Silgan Holdings (SLGN) for the next 10 years. Continue reading

Best Buy 10-Year Targets

Below are the valuation targets for Best Buy (BBY) for the next 10 years. Continue reading

Parker-Hannifin Corp. 10-Year Targets

Below are the valuation targets for Parker-Hannifin Corp. (PH) for the next 10 years. Continue reading

Magna International 10-Year Targets

Below are the valuation targets for Magna International (MG.TO) for the next 10 years. Continue reading

Gentex Corp. 10-Year Targets

Below are the valuation targets for Gentex Corp. (GNTX) for the next 10 years. Continue reading

Ross Stores 10-Year Targets

Below are the valuation targets for Ross Stores Inc. (ROST) for the next 10 years. Continue reading

Trinity Industries 10-Year Targets

Below are the valuation targets for Trinity Industries (TRN) for the next 10 years. Continue reading

Independent Bank 10-Year Targets

Below are the valuation targets for Independent Bank Corp. (INDB) for the next 10 years. Continue reading

U.S. Dividend Watch List: March 15, 2019

Top Five Watch List Performance Review

In our ongoing review of the NLO Dividend Watch List, we have taken the top five stocks on our list from March 16, 2018 and have checked the performance one year later. The top five companies on that list can be seen in the table below.

Symbol Name 2015 Price 2016 Price % change
CVS CVS Caremark Corp 65.65 55.60 -15.3%
TR Tootsie Roll Industries Inc 30.25 36.16 19.5%
HAS Hasbro Inc 87.74 86.72 -1.2%
PG Procter & Gamble 78.97 102.44 29.7%
HOG Harley-Davidson Inc 44.14 36.60 -17.1%
      Average 3.1%
         
DJI Dow Jones Industrial 24,946.51 25,848.87 3.6%
SPX S&P 500 2,752.01 2,822.48 2.6%

The top five companies gained +3.10% outperforming the S&P 500 by 0.5%. The top performer with a +30% return on investment is Procter & Gamble (PG). When we look back at the valuation of Procter & Gamble then, we can see (in hindsight) that the stock reached its lower limit of valuation based on dividend yield and altimeter. One can review the 10-year valuation on Procter, you will see that we placed an undervalue price at $75 and the price reached $79 at the time of the posting. By no means are we suggesting that our 10-year valuation is the key to timing the market, we're simply using it as a tool to assess the risk and reward profile of a quality company with a dependable dividend history.

U.S. Dividend Watch List: March 15, 2019

Below are companies on our watch list for the week. Continue reading

Dow, Hayek, and Graham: Price as Knowledge

Price conveys knowledge, that is the conclusion of Russ Roberts in an EconTalk podcast with Don Boudreaux dated October 28, 2013.

More specifically, Roberts was citing the work of F.A. Hayek’s “The Use of Knowledge in Society” dated 1945 and concluded that “price conveys knowledge” is the overall point of the paper.

Additionally, F.A. Hayek says:

“It is more than a metaphor to describe the price system as a kind of machinery for registering change...”

No reputable economist would want to associate their work with the actions or intentions of a speculator or investor.  However, Charles H. Dow, co-founder of the Wall Street Journal and namesake of the Dow Jones Industrial Average, has said as much about price only 43 years before the work of F.A. Hayek.

On February 25, 1902, Dow said:

"The one sure thing in speculation is that values determine prices in the long run. Manipulation is effective temporarily, but the investor establishes price in the end.  The object of all speculation is to foresee coming changes in values. Whoever knows that the value of a stock has run ahead of price and is likely to be sustained can buy that stock with confidence that as its value is recognized by investors, the price will rise (Dow, Charles H. Review and Outlook.  Wall Street Journal. February 25, 1902.)."

This aligns with F.A. Hayek’s claim that:

“…the shipper who earns his living from using otherwise empty or half-filled journeys of tramp-steamers, or the estate agent whose whole knowledge is almost exclusively one of temporary opportunities, or the arbitrageur who gains from local differences of commodity prices, are all performing eminently useful functions based on special knowledge of circumstances of the fleeting moment not known to others.”

As Dow Theorist Richard Russell has repeatedly said, the only constant is change.  The work of Charles H. Dow reminds investors that the “special knowledge of circumstances” around price helps to determine values, which are constantly changing.  This explains why:

“…the major consideration for the investor is not when he buys or sells but at what price (Benjamin Graham, David L. Dodd, Sidney Cottle. Security Analysis, Fourth Edition. 1962. Page 70.).”

Graham would never tell an investor to time the market.  However, a “special knowledge of circumstances” would compel an investor to determine a price (based on values) that is appropriate for consideration.  This period for consideration is usually a “fleeting moment not known to [many] others.”

The work of Charles H. Dow covers almost all of the topics discussed by Hayek and Graham and thirty years beforehand.

More:

Inventory-Sales Ratio

Richard Russell’s Dow Theory Letters dated March 20, 1970:

“Sales and Inventories: The accompany chart from the Journal of Commerce (thanks to Humphrey Neill) shows an interesting picture, the critical sales to inventory ratio. When business is expanding, and we note on the chart that the long upward rise in the FRB production index [Industrial Production Index] signifies that it has been expanding, manufacturers tend to become increasingly bullish. Consequently, they also seek to build up their inventories in anticipation of increasing business (and as a hedge against inflation.)

image

“Then, as a slowdown in sales appears, it usually catches manufacturers either unaware or unable to adjust their inventories fast enough. Those who see the slowdown coming may cut back their inventory building in anticipations. This is termed to voluntary inventory cutting. But in most cases a belated recognition of a sales slowdown hits manufacturers. Then they are faced with a problem; sales are declining, and they have far too many goods coming in on order. The next step is canceling unwanted orders and cutting back on future orders. This is the process known as in voluntary inventory cutting, and it is undoubtedly happening now (page 5).” Continue reading