Category Archives: Altimeter

Ritchie Brothers: Now What?

In our June 12, 2016 posting titled “Ritchie Brother: Inflection Point?” we said the following:

  • “…it appears that [Ritchie Brothers] RBA is at a threshold that has not been exceeded since early 2011”
  • “…the stock could rise to $48.00.”
  • the stock needs “…some kind of reprieve from the most recent parabolic move in the price”

Since June 2016, RBA has managed to trace out the following price action (in red):

image

As the last bullet point indicated and the price chart has reflected, the parabolic move was resolved with a decline to the recent low of $27.27.  Unfortunately, we now need another parabolic move from $27.27 to the recent jump above $35 to be resolved in some way or another.

Another item that was pointed out was the possibility that RBA could exceed a level in Edson Gould’s Altimeter, a level that had not been exceeded since 2011.  The recent price action since June 2016 has allowed this to occur as well.

image

 

We’re still thinking that the rise to $48 is possible.  The recent news of the acquisition by RBA of IronPlanet makes it more possible to hit our target.  However, the recent price activity of going from $27 to $35 overnight based on an acquisition simply means that achieving the $48 target will take more time than we had anticipated.

Apple: Fallen and Almost There

On January 8, 2016, we posted the following chart:

image

That red line that says 150 was our projected downside target based on the historical average from as far back as 2004.  The update to this chart is below (Altimeter levels adjusted for dividends):

image

Apple is on the cusp of hitting that downside target.  What happens if the stock breaks through on the downside, then you’d want to consider the investment merit of the stock based on conservative fundamental data.  Keep in mind that the current P/E ratio of 10 should jump before the stock marches higher.

Do you remember that article we posted on September 23, 2012, about how adding Apple (AAPL) to the Dow Industrials would be “not so great”? Yeah, well, since being included into the index on March 19, 2015, Apple has declined –28% and the company that it replaced, AT&T (T), has increased +19%.  True to form, the inclusion of Apple into the Dow Jones Industrial Average coincides with decline in the stock price.  The adjustment period should be coming to an end.  Let’s see how this plays out.

Transaction Alert

On February 5, 2016, we executed the following transaction(s):

Continue reading →

Apple Inc.

image

Reference:

Whole Foods Market

image

Price change since August 1, 2014 recommendation of WFM:

image

We said the following at the time:

“Investors interested in WFM should consider a 3 step purchase plan with the first purchase at the current price with additional  investments at $30 and at $24 or below.  It appears that WFM has considerable price support at the $24 level.”

Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines

image

Transaction Alert

Quick Take: Dover Corp.

According to Yahoo!Finance, “Dover Corporation manufactures and sells a range of equipment and components, specialty systems, and support services in the United States. The company operates in four segments: Energy, Engineered Systems, Fluids, and Refrigeration & Food Equipment. The Energy segment provides solutions and services for the production and processing of oil, natural gas liquids, and gas to drilling and production, bearings and compression, and automation end markets.”

image

The price of Dover Corp. (DOV) has declined by –32.46% since the early July 2014 peak.  Looking at the stock, it appears that the downward spiral is locked in.  The following are some thoughts about the stock.

Continue reading →

IBM: A Value Investor’s Delight

In April 2012, we published an article titled, “What Does Warren Buffett See In IBM?”  At the time we concluded the article with the following thought:

“…just imagine what IBM will look like after falling to a 52-week low.”

A reader of our article took exception to the idea of IBM declining in price with the remark:

“I have no idea why you think you could buy IBM on a 52 week low. There is nothing fundamental about the company that would lead one to think that might happen. IBM is a difficult company to short because people who own it primarily intend to hold it for a longer term, do not trade on margin, and do not sell their shares based on fear (Momintn. What Does Warren Buffett See in IBM? April 19, 2015. link.).”

Since our article, IBM has declined from $207 to $161 with upside movement being limited to $213.

image

In spite of the price decline of nearly –22% since 2012, IBM has increased the dividend by +53%.   This has resulted in a situation where the price of IBM has becomes very compelling from a value perspective.  As indicated in our original article on IBM, the growth of the dividend has become an overpowering force which is creating a stock that could eclipse all expectation for long-term investors.  This leaves aside the topic of IBM share repurchases which Warren Buffett discussed in his 2011 shareholder letter.

Our premise of IBM’s valuation is narrowly perched on the work of Edson Gould’s Altimeter.  Below is an update of Gould’s Altimeter since our April 2012 article.

image

According to Gould’s Altimeter, IBM is now undervalued below the levels of the 2008 low.  We think that a value investor would have fun pouring over the data to determine the actual value of IBM.   Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines [SRL] indicate that the conservative downside target for IBM is $130.  However, we think a process of accumulation at the current price, and below, is a prudent long-term strategy.

Hospitality Properties Trust Downside Target

We’re always hopeful and expectant about the future prospects of any investment that we make.  However, that doesn’t mean that we’re going to ignore the most pressing matter when investing which is assessing the downside risk.  Below is the downside risk assessment for Hospitality Properties Trust (HPT) based on the work of Edson Gould.

The first tool of Gould is the Altimeter.  This assesses a stock based on the stock price relative to the dividend that is paid.  In this case, HPT has come off of a recent high near 70.  This high matched the high of late 2006, the subsequent decline brought the stock price down nearly –80%.  We don’t think that it is realistic to believe that HPT will decline as in the period from 2006 to 2008.  However, we’ve outlined in red a low that we feel is reasonable if a decline were to take place.  This low is at the $21 level where there appears to be a common retracement point.

image

If worse comes to worse, HPT could decline to point A or $13.00.  If a repeat of the housing crisis were to take place then HPT could decline as low as point B or $4.67.

The other tool that Gould used was the Speed Resistance Line [SRL].  The SRL is ideal for stocks that increase significantly out of proportion to the general stock market.  As HPT has increased nearly twice that of the S&P 500, we feel that the SRL is the most appropriate assessment for downside risk.

image

In this case, the SRL indicates that the conservative downside target is $26.22.  In the previous decline of 2006 to 2008, HPT declined to the previous low set in 1999 at slightly below $5.00.  However, as we mentioned before, we don’t think that this time is anything like the rise and fall of the housing bubble.  Therefore, we’re looking for HPT to successfully breach the $26.22 level and retrace to the $18.86 level before a possible rebound.  Our experience has been for HPT to adhere to the ascending lines for most stocks that we have covered in the past.

Who is Edson Gould?

"Edson Gould spent over 60 years working in and studying financial markets. Gould studied the arts at Princeton, engineering at Lehigh (from where he graduated in 1922), and finance at New York University. In 1922, after working for a short time at Western Electric, he joined Moody's Investor Service as an analyst and later was editor of Moody's Stock Survey, Bond Survey, and Advisory Reports. In 1948, he began at Arthur Wiesenberger & Company, where he developed and edited the well-known Wiesenberger Investment Report and became a senior partner. He also was Research Director at E. B. Smith (which later became Smith Barney), and worked for Nuveen."

(source: Market Technicians Association. Gould, Edson Beers, Knowledge Base. Accessed April 26, 2012. link MTA reference.)

"Market technician Edson Gould always laughed at the idea of having a significant influence on the stock market, but his predictions were the most precise around. He pinpointed major bull markets and prophesied bottom-out markets as if he had his own peephole into the future. But in place of a crystal ball and wacky off-the-cuff schemes, his were smart, intensely researched and time-tested theories that made him a legend in the investment community."

(source: Fisher, Kenneth L.. 100 Minds That Made the Market. Business Classics, Woodside, CA. 1993. page 320.)

Quick Take: Carbo Ceramics

Review

On August 6, 2012, we purchased Carbo Ceramics with the following rationale:

“Carbo Ceramics (CRR) has been mentioned by us on several occasions.  CRR first appeared on our February 10, 2012 U.S. Dividend Watch List (found here) and was trading at $85.94.  An Altimeter was run on CRR which indicated that the stock would be undervalued at $62.40 (found here).  However, as CRR has experienced a dividend increase of 12.5% since our May 28, 2012 Altimeter, the stock is now considered undervalued at $70.  While we do expect approximately 20% downside risk from the current price, we are comfortable with adding to our position when such a decline takes place.”

As it appeared that Carbo was undervalued between $62.40 and $70, we used 5% of our portfolio to purchase the stock. After August 6, 2012, Carbo Ceramics fell as low as $63.03 and increased as much as $156.

image

Update

Below are the updated numbers for Carbo Ceramics after the decline from the most recent peak of $156.  We will cover both aspects of CRR based on Gould’s Altimeter and Speed Resistance Lines.  First, the qualitative review based on the Altimeter.

Quick Take: Consolidated Edison

“The valuation problem is far from academic: In recent years, some huge-scale frauds and near-frauds have been facilitated by derivatives trades. In the energy and electric utility sectors, for example, companies used derivatives and trading activities to report great ‘earnings’ – until the roof fell in when they actually tried to convert the derivatives-related receivables on their balance sheets into cash. ‘Mark-to-market’ then turned out to be truly ‘mark-to-myth.’”

Buffett, Warren. Berkshire Hathaway. 2002 Letter to Shareholders. February 21, 2003.

Berkshire Hathaway: 10-year Price Projections

In our May 6, 2012 posting on Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-A) titled “Should Berkshire Hathaway Be Trading at 1995 Prices?”, we gave price projections based on Edson Gould’s Altimeter using very conservative estimates if BRK-A paid a dividend.  As we’ve managed to achieve the middle of the three upside targets set down in our 2012 article, we’re going to list the price that we think BRK-A would be considered undervalued for each of the next 10 years.

Berkshire Hathaway Meets NLO Target

On May 6, 2012, we proposed that Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-A) was trading at a price that was well below its true value.  At the time, BRK-A was trading at $164,990 per share.  However, we proposed that Berkshire Hathaway should have been selling at much higher prices with upside targets of $175k, $197k and $219k in a 2-3 year timeframe.  As BRK-A sits within 1% of our mid-range target of $197,190 after two years, we believe it is time to reassess where Berkshire Hathaway sits within the context of Edson Gould’s Altimeter.

Dow Altimeter Review

As the Dow Industrials meander near all-time highs, it is necessary to review Edson Gould’s Altimeter for the index.

Continue reading →

Review: Apple’s Altimeter

Continue reading →