Author Archives: nlo-admin

Dow Jones REIT ETF Downside Targets

According to Charles H. Dow:

"The point of importance for those who deal in industrial stocks is whether the capitalization of the companies into which they propose to buy is moderate or excessive, when compared with the aggregate earnings of the various concerns forming the combination in a period of depression. It is probable that consolidated companies will be able to earn as much in the next period of low prices as the companies forming the combine were able to earn in the last one; hence the very foundation of investments in industrials should be knowledge of what these companies earned, say in 1893 to 1896, making, perhaps, reasonable allowance for economies under consolidation (Dow, Charles H. Review and Outlook. Wall Street Journal. April 27, 1899.)."

Dow’s point? To gauge the extent of a potential decline we need to consider the prior depressed levels as the benchmark for the next period of low prices and earnings.

How does this tie into the SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR)?  Below are the Speed Resistance Lines for RWR in the period from 2001 to 2009.

image

The downside targets were:

  • $79.20 (conservative target)
  • $56.24 (mid-range target)
  • $33.29 (extreme target)

In the last period of decline, RWR achieved all of the downside targets.  While achieving the extreme downside target of $33.29 is ideal, it isn’t the norm.  For this reason, when the extreme downside target is achieved it stands out for what could happen in the next period of decline.

Below we provided the downside targets for the SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF based on the price action from 2009 to 2020. Continue reading

Boeing Upside Resistance Targets

Below are the upside resistance targets for Boeing (BA):

image

The upside resistance targets seem daunting.  We’ve seen bigger and better companies bailed out and not able to recover from these levels.  There is always a first.

Palladium Achieves Target

On January 24, 2020, we said the following of Palladium:

“Because of the precedent set in the period from 1996 to 2001, we expect that the conservative downside target of $1,627.93 will be achieved.”

Below is the charting of our assessment and the subsequent price action.

image

Not only did palladium decline below the target of $1,627.93, the price of palladium fell to $1,370 on an intraday basis on March 19, 2020, almost exactly half the distance between the conservative and mid-range targets.

see also: Revised Upside and Downside Targets for Palladium

Palladium: Upside and Downside Targets

Below are the upside and downside targets for Palladium based on the February 27, 2020 peak. Continue reading

The History of REITs is MIA

While looking over the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) website (https://www.reit.com/) in search of a price index, we found this note about the history of U.S. REITs:

"U.S. REITs were established by Congress in 1960 to give all investors, especially small investors, access to income-producing real estate."

Considering that REITs started in 1960, we were expecting that there would be a price index that goes back to 1960 with a full list of the original members of that index.  Strangely, the only price index that could be found begins in 1972.  We thought that this is highly unusual, especially from the leading source for information on REITs.  The thought becomes, why isn’t there a list of those REITs from the beginning?  As the leading source for information on REITs, what are the challenges to providing this information?

Such history and component information can be found for most major indexes like the Dow Jones Industrial Average, Dow Jones Transportation Average, and Dow Jones Utility Average.  In the case of the Dow Jones Industrial Average, the index is famously known to begin in 1896 for the Wall Street Journal.  However, lesser known is the fact that the Dow's first index of stocks appeared in The Customer's Afternoon Letter in 1884 and  consisted of eleven companies:

  • Chicago & North Western (merged with Union Pacific in 1995)
  • Delaware, Lackawanna & Western (merged with Erie Railroad in 1956)
  • Lake Shore (merged with New York Central in 1914)
  • New York Central (merged with Penn Central in 1968)
  • St. Paul (bankrupt in 1925)
  • Northern Pacific preferred (bankrupt in 1893)
  • Union Pacific (bankrupt in 1893)
  • Missouri Pacific (bankrupt in 1915)
  • Louisville & Nashville (merged to become CSX Transportation in 1986)
  • Pacific Mail (merged with Dollar Steamship Company in 1925)
  • Western Union (bankrupt in 1991)

Although there is a list of original members of the Dow Jones Industrial Average going back to the predecessor of the Wall Street Journal in 1884 with extensive history on those companies, there is no such detail from the NAREIT based on traded REITs from 1960.

While we’ve managed to compile a list of REITs from 1961 to 1991, below is the list of REITs that we could find for the period of 1961-1963 as provided by Norman E. Bailey’s paper titled “Real Estate Investment Trusts: An Appraisal.”

image

We would love to know if there is a full list of REITs from 1960 to 1972 with the price performance from the NAREIT.  It would go a long way to improving the knowledge of REITs as investments if this data was made openly available. 

When data from 1884 can be found with  very little effort on the Dow Jones Industrial Average, what is the challenge of providing similar data from 1960?

see also:  REIT Archives

source:

  • Bailey, Norman E. Real Estate Investment Trusts: An Appraisal. Financial Analysts Journal. May-June 1966. pages 107-114.

The 2007 UBS Playbook

In a SeekingAlpha posting titled “Time to dust off investing strategies from 2009 crisis, UBS says” dated April 12, 2020, it is suggested that:

“A group of deep-value stocks were winners for investors through multiple parts of the cycle during the 2008-09 financial crisis, and a UBS analyst team says it is time to revisit those investing strategies.”

The benefit of an analyst is that they give good guidance beforehand.  Assessing the recommendations after the fact is necessary but using such an approach could be argued as having elements of survivor bias or data mining.  After all, if the company went out of business  it isn’t even being considered for the possible mistakes or bad assessment.

In order to truly learn from the past, it is best to look at published recommendations at the peak in the market and review the performance.  This is where we can learn the most that isn’t biased toward favorable outcomes.

Below we rate and review published recommendations by all UBS analysts that give specific recommendations in Barron’s throughout the period from January 2007 to December 2007 (that we could find).

Safeway (SWY): UBS analyst Neil Currie

“A compelling voice of dissent comes from UBS analyst Neil Currie, who pegs Safeway's core earnings at $1.65 a share in 2006 and $1.74 in 2007 once Blackhawk is stripped out. With the Street assuming a "best-case scenario," he assigns a more moderate multiple of 15 times 2007 projected earnings of $1.90, and says Safeway should be worth about 29. Smart shoppers might want to check out another aisle for something fresher (Tan, Kopin. Safeway: Ripe for a Fall?. Barron's. January 1, 2007).”

image

Safeway, as reflected in the chart, was expected to be value not much more than $29 and that the stock price would likely decline in value from there.  UBS analyst Neil Currie was right on the mark as Safeway rose slightly in 2007 and then fell as low as $15 by 2012.  A later buyout offer of reached for Safeway as the stock traded as high as $35 in 2015.

DBS Group Holdings (DBSDF): UBS analyst Jaj Singh

“Despite last year's rally, bank valuations remain reasonable at 1.75 times book, or accounting, value. UBS analyst Jaj Singh argues that they should be higher because average valuations over the past eight years tracked a deflationary period, and "a more relevant period is the early 1990s." Then, banks traded at 2.6 times book value; UBS' target ratio today is 1.9. In the banking group, DBS, or Development Bank of Singapore (DBS.Singapore), boasts strong deposits, low funding costs and a 67% loan-to-deposit ratio that leaves much room for expansion. Tan, Kopin. Singapore: the Safest Route to Asia's Riches. Barron's. Feb 12, 2007).”

image

The crosshair in the chart above, from February 12, 2007, should be all that needs to be said on this topic.  At roughly $14.85, the price of DBS declined as much as -64%.  Currently, DBS Group sits at nearly -7% below the 2007 recommendation.

Weyerhaeuser (WY): UBS analyst Richard Schneider

“Shareholders are pressuring Weyerhaeuser to change its status as a corporation to a REIT with better tax benefits and where gains are passed on to investors, but it is unclear whether the push will succeed. One hurdle: The company "may have to sell everything but timberland to qualify" for RE IT status, according to UBS analyst Richard Schneider. The analyst, who rates the stock Neutral, says Weyerhaeuser may seek to partially restructure and split off its containerboard business (Malik, Naureen S. Forest Grumps. Barron’s. March 19, 2007.).”

image

From the March 19, 2007 recommendation to the low of March 6, 2009, WY fell approximately -75.44%.  Weyerhaeuser currently sits –29.61% below the 2007 recommendation.

Daimler AG (DDAIF): UBS analyst Max Warburton 

“Notes Max Warburton, a UBS analyst in London: ‘Ex-Chrysler, Daimler is already an 8% margin business. Management is committed to unlocking value and the 'new Daimler' is set to be a high-margin, high-cashflow business.’ The stock, Jonas and Warburton argue, is worth over $100 (Palmer, Jay. If You Can Find a Better Stock, Buy It. Barron’s. May 21, 2007.).”

image

From May 21, 2007 to the low of 2009, Daimler AG declined approximately –76%. Currently, Daimler AG sits –63% below the 2007 recommended level.

CSL (CSL.AX): UBS analyst Andrew Goodsall

“The outlook for CSL wasn't always so bullish. In 2003, its plasma business threatened to unravel when prices crashed due to oversupply; CSL shares plummeted from A$52 to a low of A$11.57. The glut spurred Aventis, now Sanofi-Aventis (SNY), to seek a buyer for its plasma unit. CSL Chief Executive Brian McNamee stepped in, paying almost A$1 billion to acquire the business-twice the size of his own plasma division-and the bet paid off.

“The deal helped improve the dynamics for the whole industry, as U.S. collection centers were consolidated. With several key barriers to entering the market, including a three-to-four-year lead time in setting up new centers, UBS analyst Andrew Goodsall estimates demand for plasma product should be "tight" until at least 2010 (Murdoch, Susan. Australia's First $100 Stock? Barron’s. May 21, 2007.).”

image

image

From May 21, 2007 to March 9, 2009, CSL increased +10%.  More importantly, CSL increased +997% from May 21, 2007 to April 10, 2020.

Ameriprise Financial (AMP): UBS analyst Andrew Kligerman

“UBS analyst Andrew Kligerman predicted in our story that Ameriprise shares, then 45, would surge once investors realized what a money spinner the company was. He has a Buy rating with a target price of 73, or about 30% above recent levels (Willoughby, Jack. Ameriprise Shares Look Lofty. Barron’s. August 6, 2007.) ”

image

image

From August 6, 2007 to the low of November 2008, AMP declined -78%.  As of April 9, 2020, AMP is up +109%.

Gold/GLD: UBS analyst John Reade

“Analysts say that buyers are set to return as the urge to avoid risk revives. Add to this an increasing physical demand from consumers, particularly in India, and gold's outlook is all the more bullish and its current price all the more attractive. Says UBS analyst John Reade: "In this environment, there's a meaningful chance that gold will attract the safe-haven bid that has been so far mostly absent during the credit crunch (Hotter, Andrea.Glimmers of Hope for Gold. Barron’s. August 27, 2007)."

image

At the time this was written, the iShares Gold ETF was trading at $65.98.  The ETF went as high as $184.82 and settled at $70 at the lowest point in October 2008, gaining +6.09%.  Currently, GLD sits below the 2011 peak but comfortably above the 2007 recommendation level.

British Airways (BA) or (IAG.L): UBS analyst Tim Marshall

“BA (British Airways) however, does have an ace up its sleeve: a new state-of-the-art terminal at Heathrow that opens in March. Known as Terminal 5, the huge facility will be for BA exclusively and offer travelers unusual comfort and speed in everything from security checks to baggage claims. The new terminal will ‘make the airline far more competitive and, in the end, will be a far greater positive for the airline than Open Skies will be a negative,’ maintains Tim Marshall, a UBS analyst in London. If he's right, the stock could actually rebound over the next 12 months (Palmer, Jay. Opening the Skies. Barron’s. December 3, 2007.).”

image

From December 3, 2007 to the low of October 10, 2008, IAG.L declined -68.02%.  IAG.L sits

Thoughts

The winners, and still champions, are Safeway, CSL Limited and gold.  The analysts, Neil Currie, Andrew Goodsall and John Reade, made calls that have stood the test of a major bear market and thrived through the subsequent bull market. These are analysts that should be tracked down and followed as their assessment may have been a function of timing, luck, or solid hard work.

image

Our favorite call is the Safeway assessment by Neil Currie because the price target given was very accurate and even after a buyout offer (years later)  the stock did not get priced far above the 2007 valuation.

Those that didn’t do so well were at the mercy of the markets.  Andrew Kligerman gets a mention for recommending Ameriprise Financial which crashed and recovered.

Berkshire Hathaway Hits Target

On February 22, 2019, we posted 10-Year price targets for Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-A).  At the time, we had 2020 undervalued and extreme undervalue targets of $306,061 and $222,006, respectively.

image

Since that time, Berkshire Hathaway has had an intraday low of $239,440 on March 23, 2020.

image

The 2020 targets have been in place since our May 6, 2012 posting on Berkshire Hathaway.

see also: All 10-Year Targets

ABM Achieves Target

On October 2, 2018, we posted 10-Year price targets for ABM Industries (ABM). At the time, we had undervalued and extreme undervalue targets of $25.12 and $17.06, respectively.

image

Since that time, ABM Industries has had an intraday low of $19.79 on March 24, 2020.

image

see also: All 10-Year Targets

Starbucks Hits 2020 Target

On October 1, 2018, we posted 10-Year price targets for Starbucks (SBUX).  At the time, we had undervalued and extreme undervalue targets for 2020 of $72.88 and $43.97, respectively.

image

Since that time, Starbucks has had an intra-day low of $50.02 on March 18, 2020.

image

see also: All 10-Year Targets

Polaris Industries Hits Extreme Target

On January 27, 2020, we posted 10-Year price targets for Polaris Industries (PII).  At the time, we had an extreme undervalue targets $64.81.

image

Since that time, Polaris Industries has had a closing low of $39.00 on April 3, 2020.

image

see also: All 10-Year Targets

Bank of Hawaii Hits Target

On September 28, 2018, we posted 10-Year price targets for Bank of Hawaii (BOH).  At the time, we had undervalued and extreme undervalue targets of $64.18 and $44.16, respectively.

image

Since that time, Bank of Hawaii has had a closing low of $47.37 on March 23, 2020.

image

see also: All 10-Year Targets

A.O. Smith comes within $1.01 of Target

On October 2, 2018, we provided downside targets for A.O. Smith.  Our undervalued target for 2020 was $32.80.

image

Since that time, A.O. Smith has declined as low as $33.81 on an intraday basis.

image

Federal Realty Achieves Extreme Target

On December 25, 2019, we posted 10-Year price targets for Federal Realty (FRT).  We had an extreme downside target of $67.98:

image

Since that time, Federal Realty has had a closing low of $65.81.

image

We provide extreme undervalue targets to account for the one-off events that occur from time to time that are consistent with each individual stock.

Market Capitulation Q&A

A reader asks:

“So...what does Dow theory indicate to you, NLO? This Dow Theorist thinks we have experienced capitulation, and it could be smoother going forward.”

Our response:

Step 1: We will review the work as presented by Jack Schannep.

“…a short-term oscillator which measures the percent of divergence between the three major stock market indices (DJIA, S&P500, and the NYSE Composite), and their time-weighted moving averages.  When all three indices are simultaneously in double digits below those respective moving averages, we have Capitulation.  The most recent occurrence of Capitulation is shown below. The 16 dates, market levels, and the subsequent returns over various timeframes are shown below.  You’ll see that the end of the last 9 bear markets were signaled, and 3 of the 7 before that. Some bear markets end, however, with a whimper, hence no Capitulation indication.”

image

Step 2: We address some house cleaning issues.

First and foremost, the above Capitulation Indicator is not Dow Theory.  This is not a problem as the data should speak volumes, as it does in this case.

Second, the S&P 500 index did not exist until 1957.  The merging of Standard Statistical Company and Poor’s, creating Standard & Poor’s, did not occur until 1941. 

For this reason, the claimed data from 1953 to 1957 is based on reconstituting of the index based on stocks that would have mimicked the Dow Jones Industrial Average or the New York Stock Exchange Composite. 

Using the S&P 500 data from 1957 arrives at only 37% of available data that can be found for the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

Step 3: The data: Initial Thoughts

In the Capitulation Indicator above, we like to eliminate indications that occur within a year of the last indication.  Why?  Because it artificially increases the outcome. Additionally, it puts into question the decision of whether to use the indicator the second time if the market was lower than the initial date.  This would have resulted in the elimination of the following dates:

  • September 30, 1974
  • December 3, 1987
  • July 19, 2002
  • October 9, 2002
  • November 12, 2008

These dates would have been considered false signals, in our view, comprising 33% of the averaged data.

This brings us to the dates that are suggested.  Did the S&P 500 decline below the level that the Capitulation Indicator suggested?  Yes, on several occasions, the S&P 500 declined below the prior signal.  Does the mean that the indicator is unprofitable? No.  However, when the closing commentary on the data is “…Some bear markets end, however, with a whimper, hence no Capitulation indication”  and only a third of the data is covered, we cannot make a fair assessment of the qualitative elements of the Capitulation Indicator.

Conclusion:

All we can say is that some refinements are needed based on what we have seen so far.  Regarding Dow Theory and potential downside & upside targets, the subscriber links below outline in detail our take on the topic.

Simon Property Group SRL

Markets are built on precedent.  For this reason, we will display the downside targets in two prior periods to establish the history for Simon Property Group before getting to the most recent decline.  We also provide the upside resistance targets for those hoping to “play” the move to the upside.

To get yourself familiar with the work of Edson Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines, we recommend that you review the our article titled “The Power and Lesson of Speed Resistance Lines” dated February 4, 2018.  Since that article, approximately 90% of the Speed Resistance Lines that we have run have come to fruition.

Simon Property Group Downside Targets

1993-2000

image

The mid-range target is a point to watch as it generally defines the balance of the direction of the stock price.  Notice how SPG managed to rise and then decline below the prior low.

1999-2009

image

As should be expected, the decline in the run from the 2007 peak was almost down to the prior starting point as the decline was generally a result of the malinvestment in the real estate sector.  As noted in the chart, SPG managed to not replicated the prior cycle of decline from 1998 to 1999.  However, it did get pretty close.

2008-2020

image

The decline from the 2016 peak should not be unfamiliar since it is almost a replication of the decline from 2007 to 2009.  If the current decline were to replicated the 2007-2009 decline, it would bring the price of SPG to $34.16.  This number is not too far from the $36.04 level indicated by the price-to-dividend ratio as outlined in the 10-Year Target that was previously posted.

Upside Resistance Targets

2016-2020

image

Assuming that the $34.16 price is the downside target and investors are willing to accept such a risk, the upside targets are very compelling.  The first upside target is $135.81, or nearly 100% above the current price of $70.  However, anyone willing to participate in the potential decline to $34.16 need to accept that rising to $197.31 is still within the declining trend which could conceivably result in a decline back to the $44.01 price.

Our primary concern is with downside risk and therefore if a real estate investment trust must be bought at this time then we’d prefer a position in the Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund (VNQ) over individual names where the volatility is far above our tolerance levels.

see also: U.S. Realty from 1918 to 1945