Author Archives: nlo-admin

Analyst Estimates: U.S. Dividend Watch List

Performance Review

On October 21, 2016, we posted analyst estimates for the expected gains for our watch list stocks dated October 14, 2016.  Below is the performance review of the stocks that were part of that assessment.

image

At the time, we grouped the stocks into three separate categories (“high risk, high return,” “average risk, average return,” and “high expectation, low return”) as seen in the chart below:

image

As separate categories, the returns were as follows:

image

We have to be mindful of the fact that the high, average, and low returns are based on long term expectations for similar stocks.  When contrasted against the Dow Jones Industrial Average, which gained +27.91% over the same time, the gains of each category are hardly “high” or “average.”

California Real Estate Trends

Two indicators of the California real estate market that we’re tracking are the median price of existing detached homes and the violations of California regulations for real estate licensees, agents, brokers and non-licensed individual/firms involved in real estate transactions*.  Below we have the monthly and 12-month moving average data for these two series from 1990 to the present.

U.S Dividend Watch List: October 20, 2017

The bull market march on this week. The S&P 500 is only 25 points away from 2,600. Though it is difficult to find quality companies to purchase at a discount price when the market is at the all-time high, we managed to put together a list of high quality companies which pay dividend trading near their yearly low. Below are list of 30 companies for this week. Continue reading

Performance Review: October 19, 2012

Below is the 5-year performance of our Dividend Watch List from October 19, 2012 to October 20, 2017 as compared to the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

Continue reading

Real Estate Review

On September 12, 2016, we assess the real estate market.  In this update, we’ll reconsider the points that we made to determine the progress that has been made with our analysis.  There are some surprises as we go through the limit info that is tracked.

In this assessment, we track the Housing Starts of New Privately Owned Housing Units.  At the time of the September 2016 review, we said the following:

“The latest trend from September 2015 to the present appears to show topping out action as the Housing Starts data seems to be running out of steam.  Additionally, the dotted red line in the chart shows the Dow Theory halfway point at which either the market booms higher or stalls & stutters before declining substantially, relative to the most recent rise.”

So far, the data has fallen in alignment with our claim of topping out action, as seen in the chart below.

Industrial Production Index In Decline

As of November 2014, the Industrial Production Index* has been in a declining trend.

image

The beginning of the rising trend was established in June 2009.  When looked at from the percentage change over the previous year, there has been been only six out of 17 times when the Industrial Production Index had a negative declining trend AND a recession was not called by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).

Continue reading

Stock Market Context is Invaluable

As market pundits either celebrate or examine the stock market crash of 1987, there comes point when all analysis becomes a form of paralysis. Some say a crash won’t happen again while others proclaim, almost daily since the 2009 low, that a crash is just around the corner.  When posed with such a question, we always ask, what is our point of reference?

To arrive at a point of reference, we read an article that says that the S&P 500 has had it “Too good, Too Long.”  We liked this reference point as it charts the S&P 500 from 1996 to 2017.  We decided to use the same number of trading days for the Dow Jones Industrial Average going backwards from the 1987 peak at 2,722.42, which led us to the beginning of 1966.  When you contrast the price activity of the S&P 500 against the Dow Jones Industrial Average over the two periods, we get a point of reference that is all too telling.

image

 

Our observations of the market leading up to the the peak in the Dow Jones Industrial Average on August 25, 1987 contrasted with the S&P 500 since 1996 tells us a few things that need pointing out.

First, nothing that has happened in the exact same number of trading days between the two indexes is unique.  The Dow had declines of –35%, –44%, and –26% in the late-1960’s and 1970’s.  Likewise, the S&P 500 experienced declines of –49% and –56% in the period of late-1990’s and 2007-2009.

Second, the rise from the lows could be considered to be almost equal. If we take the low of 2009 for the S&P 500 and compare it to the corresponding low in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, based on the same number of trading days, we find that the increase in the S&P 500 is not unusual at this point as compared to the Dow.  From the 1978 low in the Dow, the index gained +266% to the 1987 peak.  The 2009 low in the S&P 500 Index the gain has been +278% so far.  If we take the ultimate low in the Dow Jones Industrial Average from 1974, the increase was +371%.  This puts the S&P 500 well within the range of “normal” for a market rise.

Third, looking at where the Dow Jones Industrial Average was and where it currently is, there is little to suggest that the action of the S&P 500 cannot go a significant distance above the current level with moderating declines in between.  Does the S&P 500 have to do in the future what the Dow Jones Industrial Average has done in the past?  Absolutely not!  However, looking at what has happened could help to put the coming decline in the market into proper context.  As our latest bull market ranking has demonstrated, there is still a lot of upside potential in this market. 

In reality, a market crash is always on the horizon. Also, when data is provided, if there is no context then there is no meaning or value. So, what should investors being doing now in preparation for the next crash? Our opinion is that investors should stockpile cash as the stock market increases.  Use that cash for when the next stock market decline ensues.  Educate yourself on investment values and be ready to hold your nose and buy those values at significant lows relative to prior peaks.

Performance Review: October 18, 2013

Below is the 4-year performance of our Dividend Watch List from October 18, 2013 to October 18, 2017 as compared to the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

symbol Name total return
LLY Eli Lilly & 94.00%
SYY Sysco Corp. 89.40%
NWN Northwest Natural Gas 76.71%
CAT Caterpillar 74.84%
ED Consolidated Edison 72.60%
PPL PP&L Corporation 58.85%
PM Philip Morris International 54.29%
KO Coca-Cola Co 35.75%
T AT&T Inc 26.86%
VMI Valmont Industries, Inc. 25.31%
SCG SCANA Corporation 22.83%
MAC Macerich 18.13%
XOM Exxon Mobil Corp. 7.79%
IBM IBM 4.23%
  Average % change 47.26%
     
DJIA Dow Jones Industrial Average 67.71%

The total return for the Dow Jones Industrial Average was +67.71% while the average total return for the entire watch list was +47.26%.

Transaction Alert

On October 17, 2017, we executed the following transaction(s):

Continue reading

Performance Review: October 16, 2015

Below is the 2-year performance of our U.S. Dividend Watch List from October 16, 2015 to October 16, 2017 as compared to the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

Continue reading

Canadian Dividend Watch List: October 2017

Below is the list of Canadian dividend stocks that currently, or in the past, had a history of consecutive dividend increases that are at compelling prices or values.  We include analyst estimates for the coming year.

Performance Review: October 14, 2011

Below is the 6-year performance of our Dividend Watch List from October 14, 2011 to October 13, 2017 as compared to the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

Continue reading

Performance Review: October 16, 2009

Below is the 8-year performance of our Dividend Watch List from October 16, 2009 to October 13, 2017 as compared to the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

Continue reading

Bitcoin: Upside Targets Achieved, Now What?

If anyone has managed to follow our work on the topic of Bitcoin, we can only lay claim to the October 7, 2014 call for “Speculators to Unite” when the cryptocurrency was priced at $334.09.  At the time, we said the following:

“…bitcoin is worth the plunge.  Based on the revised price peak of $1,147.25, bitcoin has a conservative upside target price of $723.34 and an extreme upside target of $1,446.68.”

Since October 7, 2014, we have issued revised upside targets and downside targets that have been generally within the range of expectation.  Our last published upside target for Bitcoin was $6,260.91 as seen in the September 5, 2017 posting titled “Bitcoin: Setting the Stage.”  The graphical representation of the price of Bitcoin since October 7, 2014 is staggering and worth a refresher view.

image

At this point, as Bitcoin sits within 7% of the last published target, we cannot take seriously the updated target that has been generated ($7,166.29) based on our Speed Resistance Line calculations.  We are throwing in the towel on taking the $7,166.29 figure, and any future upside targets that go uncorrected to the tune of –50% or more, as something we can feel confident is worth the speculation.

Continue reading

Bull Market Ranking

For anyone who claims that the current bull market is a Federal Reserve induced binge based on manipulated monetary policy, this market still has to exceed the bull market that followed the decline of 1852 before the non-central bank era bull markets could be legitimately ignored.  For those willing to look at the history of stock market recoveries, we present the top ten market recoveries from 1835 to 2017.

Continue reading