Author Archives: nlo-admin

Inverted Yield Curve Self-Fulfilling?

In the Crain’s Cleveland Business July 17, 2018 article titled “Fed chiefs look to yield curve for insights into inflation, state of economy,” Atlanta Fed President is quoted as saying that inversion [of yield curve] could be a self-fulfilling prophecy if investors believe it will bring recession.

image

When we looked at the yield curve chart that was provided in the article, it seemed that the either a recession coincided with inversion or inversion coincided with recessions.  However, there was little in the way of indicating that awareness of a pending inversion would lead the public to behave in a manner that would precipitate a recession.

image

It seems that there is enough coincidence of a narrowing of the yield curve and a recession to suggest that if it were a self-fulfilling prophecy then the period of 2010 was the beginning of that process.  The year 2010 happens to be the period when the recession was considered to have ended. Yet, at the time there was no discussion of inversion and self-fulfilling prophecies.

It seems odd for a Fed Bank president to suggest that if people don’t believe it then maybe it won’t happen.

Shanghai Composite: Like a Bouncing Ball?

After looking at the Shanghai Composite, we came away with the feeling that the performance of the index looked like the pattern of a bouncing ball.  The pattern of a bouncing ball is best illustrated in the image below.

image

Of course, the mechanical forces of gravity don’t have much to do with the emotions of financial markets.  However, in spite of ourselves, we couldn’t help but make the association when it didn’t otherwise fit.  Take a look at the Shanghai Composite Index below and tell us there isn’t an uncanny resemblance.

Continue reading

Interest Rate Monitor: July 2018

Below is the updated trend in interest rates.

Continue reading

U.S Dividend Watch List: July 6, 2018

Previous Year Performance Review

In our ongoing review of the NLO Dividend Watch List, we have taken the top five stocks on our list from July 7, 2017 and have checked the performance one year later. The top five companies on that list can be seen in the table below.

Symbol Name 2015 Price 2016 Price % change
GPC Genuine Parts 86.86 90.74 4.5%
SJM JM Smucker 115.39 111.74 -3.2%
GE General Electric Co 26.15 13.85 -47.0%
HRL Hormel Foods Corp. 33.20 37.15 11.9%
CAG ConAgra Foods 33.42 35.73 6.9%
      Average -5.4%
         
DJI Dow Jones Industrial 21,414.34 24,456.48 14.2%
SPX S&P 500 2,425.18 2,759.82 13.8%

The top five companies didn't do so well with average loss of 5.4%. Biggest drag on this list was General Electric (GE). The biggest gain of 11.9% came from Hormel (HRL). Our team said the following about Hormel.

One company our model offer good risk/reward profile is Hormel Foods (HRL). Dividend payment is the best proxy for share price direction and using our dividend regression model, there is a 21% upside potential in shares of Hormel Foods. Average yield for this company historically has been in range of 1.5% but current yield of 2.2% suggest an undervalue range. Even so, one should take caution and establish a multiple purchases plan.

Another company we mentioned was Genuine Parts (GPC) which we believed to be trading near fair value at the time. Our assessment is fairly close to reality as share rose 4.5% for the year. We said the following about Genuine Parts.

Four companies are trading within 1% of its yearly low. First on the list is auto supplier Genuine Parts (GPC). Shares broke below $90 after Goldman downgraded the stock to sell from neutral rating and reduced its target price to $89 from $104. Our valuation model isn't as bullish on shares of Genuine Parts at current level but would be if shares are trading at $70. Trading at 4x book value is a bit rich and multiple of 3x would be more reasonable.

U.S. Dividend Watch List: July 6, 2018

It was a good week for the bull as the S&P 500 gained 2.2%. The momentum is swinging upward and look to the 2,800 mark to be the key technical level. The sideway trading pattern that began at the beginning of the year could mean an accumulation before the next leg up or down. A break below 2,600 would be very bearish and above 2,900 to be bullish. Our team will explores investment opportunities from the watch list below. Continue reading

Starbucks (SBUX) Position Update

It wasn't too long ago that our team initiated a sizable position on Starbucks (SBUX). We said the following in our transaction alert.

Continue reading

U.S. Dividend Watch List: June 22, 2018

Previous Year Performance Review

In our ongoing review of the NLO Dividend Watch List, we have taken the top five stocks on our list from June 23, 2017 and have checked the performance one year later. The top five companies on that list can be seen in the table below.

Symbol Name 2015 Price 2016 Price % change
SJM JM Smucker 120.72 105.71 -12.4%
CSL Carlisle Companies 94.16 108.22 14.9%
TJX TJX Companies 69.27 95.08 37.3%
GE General Electric Co 27.57 13.05 -52.7%
DNB Dun & Bradstreet Corp. 102.24 128.82 26.0%
      Average 2.6%
         
DJI Dow Jones Industrial 21,394.76 24,580.89 14.9%
SPX S&P 500 2,438.30 2,754.88 13.0%

The average gain for the top five companies was subpar. The first company on our list was JM Smucker (SJM). We thought that JM Smucker at the time was trading at fair value and a decline of 10% would prompt an investor with a good starting point. Fast forward to today and shares are off 12% from last year. As such, it's probably a great time to do evaluation JM Smucker as potential long. Our valuation model has a possible downside of 10% as the worse case scenario with 35% potential upside at current valuation.

One company we got completely wrong is Owen & Minor (OMI) which we though had reached an extreme downside. To our surprise, shares fell 44% compared to our projection of 15% downside risk. It would be difficult to walk away from a company with strong fundamental and balance sheet after a big decline such as this one. As a long-term investor, accumulating shares of Owen & Minor at the current level would put the risk and reward profile in their favor.

U.S. Dividend Watch List: June 22, 2018

Below are companies on our watch list this week. Continue reading

Transaction Alert

Below is the our latest transaction(s):

Continue reading

U.S. Dividend Watch List: June 15, 2018

Previous Year Performance Review

In our ongoing review of the NLO Dividend Watch List, we have taken the top five stocks on our list from May 27, 2016 and have checked the performance one year later. The top five companies on that list can be seen in the table below.

Symbol Name 2015 Price 2016 Price % change
CSL Carlisle Companies 95.88 108.58 13.2%
TJX TJX Companies 72.44 95.17 31.4%
SJM JM Smucker 124.72 105.73 -15.2%
CASY Caseys General Stores 108.03 100.83 -6.7%
HRL Hormel Foods Corp. 33.95 36.44 7.3%
      Average 6.0%
         
DJI Dow Jones Industrial 21,359.90 25,090.48 17.5%
SPX S&P 500 2,433.15 2,779.66 14.2%

The top five companies average gain was 6% for the year. The best performer was TJX Companies (TJX) whose shares rose 31.4%. On the opposite end of the spectrum was JM Smucker (SJM) which lost 15.2%.

Regarding TJX, we said Target (TGT) would be our preferred option in the retail space given the current dividend yield and our assessment was proven correct. While TJX gained 31.4%, Target rose 46.8%. Excerpt below is what we said last year.

Trading near the low and not far from Carlisle is a discount retailer, TJX Company (TJX). It's no secret that retail industry is in a big slump and have seen their market share shifted to Amazon. Our team have not extended our study to TJX because we own a substantial shares of Target. A recent swoon in Target shares pushed the dividend yield up to 4.6%. Compared that with 1.7% for TJX and it's a no brainer to us. Time will tell if our assessment is right.

As for JM Smucker (SJM), we believed that the valuation wasn't ripe and a drop to $100 would mark a good entry point. Sure enough, JM Smucker is currently trading at $105, a fall of 15% from last year.

U.S. Dividend Watch List: June 15, 2018

Below are companies on our watch list this week. Continue reading

Starbucks Revised Altimeter

Below is the revised Altimeter for Starbucks (SBUX).

Continue reading

Starbucks Downside Target

Below are the downside targets for Starbucks (SBUX) based on the work of Edson Gould.

Continue reading

Starbucks Altimeter

We’ve been watching the fascinating price action of Starbucks (SBUX) since it first appeared on our watch list dated November 10, 2017.

image

In the period from April 6, 2010 to October 28, 2015, the price of SBUX has increased as much as +418%.  This is an exceptional return within a confirmed bull market.  Of course, this all falls apart in a bear market and this consideration must be kept in the back your mind when thinking about the future prospects.

Since October 28, 2015, SBUX has traded in a range.  However, when looking at SBUX from a different angle, we can see that without a doubt that there are significant changes taking place.  Below is the Altimeter for Starbucks (SBUX).  We believe that this perspective on the stock clarifies the relative position of SBUX.

Continue reading

Review: The Buckle Inc.

On  June 16, 2012, we posted the following commentary on The Buckle Inc. (BKE) when the stock was trading at $36.79:

“We are very interested in this stock at the right price.  We believe that BKE will be a buy at $30 and below.  However, prior price movement based on Gould’s speed resistance lines indicated that the conservative downside target is $24.47 and the extreme downside target of $16.68.”

Since that time, The Buckle (BKE) managed to increase as high as $56.07 by January 12, 2015.  However, since January 2015, BKE fell as low as $13.70 on August 2017, on a closing basis.

image

One of the fascinating elements of the work of Edson Gould is that it can be extremely accurate in spite of incomplete data.  When we ran the figures for downside targets, BKE’s peak price was $48.39.  The peak price is part of the equation that helps to generate the downside targets.  In spite of this fact, BKE managed to decline below the extreme downside target based on the speed resistance lines (SRL).

Nasdaq v. Gold from 1971 to 2020

We like the comparison between the “freely” traded price of gold compared to the Nasdaq Composite index because it really shows the difference between the performance in the two over the years.

Most importantly, gold began trading “freely” at around the same time of the initial trading of the Nasdaq Composite Index.  Therefore, there is little in the way of distortion in the data.  Below is the daily price of gold versus the Nasdaq Composite.

Continue reading

U.S. Dividend Watch List: June 8, 2018

It was a good week for the market with the S&P 500 gaining more than 1.3%. However, the index is approaching the resistant level of 2,800 which can be trace back to March of this year. Looking at the chart, the trading range between 2,600 and 2,800 emerges. Below are companies on our dividend watch list for this week. Continue reading

Bitcoin: June 2018

Review

In our February 17, 2018 review when Bitcoin was trading at $11,092.15 and we said the following:

“…before a new high (substantially above the $19,343) is achieved, we expected a retest of the $6,914.26 level (or something close, like, $7,000-$7,200).”

On April 6, 2018, Bitcoin declined as low as $6,620.41.

On April 2, 2018, when Bitcoin was trading at $7,049, we said the following:

“The $9,148.23 level is the point where we believe the price of Bitcoin could rise to before a retest of the $11,479.73 level, if remotely possible.  Based on the recent volume characteristics, we think that the $9,148.23 is in the works.”

  On April 24, 2018, Bitcoin rose achieved $9,652.16.

On April 27, 2018, when Bitcoin was trading at $$9,278.22, we said the following:

“At this stage in the game, Bitcoin is in a no-man’s land.  While there are always three directions that the price could go (up, down, or sideways for a long time) this juncture is strictly to be played for the extreme of going back to the $11,479.73 or $6,914.26 level.  There will not be sideways action from here.”

By June 10, 2018, Bitcoin has fallen to $6,783.88. Continue reading