Nasdaq 100 Watch List: February 6, 2015

Performance Review

Below is the performance of the six stocks from the February 21, 2014 Nasdaq 100 watch list compared to the Nasdaq 100 Index gain of +15.46%.

Symbol

Name

2014 2015 change
SYMC Symantec Corporation $20.53 $24.77 20.65%
MAT Mattel, Inc. $35.55 $28.22 -20.62%
CHRW CH Robinson Worldwide $54.12 $70.51 30.28%
FAST Fastenal Company $45.61 $42.33 -7.19%
SPLS Staples, Inc. $13.09 $16.57 26.59%
CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. $22.13 $27.24 23.09%

The average gain for all of the stocks was +12.13%.  Symantec (SYMC) was the stock of interest at the time.  Our thoughts on SYMC were, “…we don’t see why the stock couldn’t decline a bit further until April or May.” In fact, SYMC declined as low as $17.95, a drop of –12.57%.  However, the final low occurred in late March instead of the April/May projection.

At the time of the posting from last year, we outlined the analyst estimated price change for six stocks on our watch list.  The projections were as follows:

image

The actual performance after one year is displayed below.

image

On the whole, it appears that the analysts were correct about the overall trend for the stocks on our watch list.  two of three were (MAT, CHRW and FAST) were expected to be a mixed bag while three of three (CSCO, SYMC and SPLS) were expected to have price increases.

February 6, 2015 Watch List

Below are the 14 Nasdaq 100 companies that are on our radar.  As readers know, we have recently  taken a sizable position in one of the stocks on this list.

A Technical Review of Mattel

Mattel (MAT) has many fundamental attributes that are well worth considering which we’ve previously outlined.  However, the technical side of the stock offers substantial food for thought.  Below we cover aspects to Mattel that, although not popular, may offer additional insight to the stock price going forward.

A Fundamental Case for Toy Maker, Mattel (MAT)

It hasn’t been fun and games for the leading toy maker, Mattel (MAT). Last week, the struggling company announced that the CEO, Bryan Stockton resigned. The preliminary result from the holiday season was dismal with profits falling -59% from a year earlier. The stock was one of the worst performing in S&P 500 over the last year. Shares fell -34% in 2014 and are already down as much as -14% in 2015. Continue reading

Gold Stock Indicator: January 30, 2015

Gold was essentially unchanged this past week while gold stocks were up nearly +4%.  So far the trend is pointing to higher gold as the November 2014 low remains in place.

 

image

Qualcomm Chokes and Other Thoughts

On January 29, 2015, Qualcomm (QCOM) announced that a “…key customer passed on new chip…”  On the news, QCOM stock fell as much as –12%.

Royal Gold: SRL Update

On October 12, 2012, we posted the following SRL for Royal Gold:

image

We said the following of the above chart:

“The SRL for Royal Gold at $44.62 doesn’t seem outlandish given what has already occurred in the previous declines from prior peaks.  The X marks the first decline after a “minor” parabolic move that was later exceeded on a larger scale to point A1, B1 and C1.  Additionally, the  X reflects the minimum retracement from the top and has provided consistent support for the price for RGLD.

“We’d consider buying RGLD if it declines to either of the support levels of X3 or C2.  The movement of RGLD has been consistent with the price of gold (GLD) which is in stark contrast with gold stocks as represented by the Philadelphia Gold and Silver Stock Index (^XAU)....”

On July 12, 2013, we said the following of RGLD:

“RGLD has fulfilled almost all of our expectations for downside risk since October 2012.  Although we’d much rather see this stock reach the extreme downside target of $33.28, we feel that purchases at the current level and below would be consistent with asset accumulation and wealth building, in contrast to those who were considering the stock at or near the October 2012 levels.”

So far, Royal Gold has adhered to the SRL outlined on October 12, 2012 and July 12, 2013 as displayed in the chart below.

image

Royal Gold has a mid-range upside target of $100.39 and an extreme upside target of $133.85 based on Gould’s Speed Resistance Line.  However, the upside targets are somewhat immaterial when considered from the context of buying based on values.

Clean Harbors Update

On February 9, 2012, we posted Edson Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines (SRL) for Clean Harbors (CLH) with the downside risk for the stock.  At the time, the downside targets were:

  • $43.53 (conservative downside target)
  • $31.00 (mid range)
  • $22.53 (extreme downside target)

Since that time, we’ve revised the downside targets to reflect the following minor changes.

  • $43.97 (conservative downside target)
  • $33.70 (mid range)
  • $23.43 (extreme downside target)

A visual of the downside targets reveals the value of Gould’s SRL.

image

So far, CLH has adhered to the SRL that was initially outlined in 2012.  If we consider the period of 2007 to 2009, when the stock fell as low as $20.54 and extend that same decline to the current period, then CLH could decline as low as $41.40.  This assumption is predicated on the stock market not experiencing a precipitous decline from the current level.  A broad market decline would easily bring CLH to the ascending $23.43 level in the SRL. 

While the fundamentals are not glowing for CLH as it goes through the process of spinning off its oil and gas services unit, which could “…take more than a year for the spinoff to be completed…”, there are expectations that the current actions will refocus the company.

Speculators, those willing to accept the downside risk of –36%, could purchase CLH with 25% of intended funds at $45.10 and $41.40.  The final purchase would be at $31.00 or below.  Investors, those willing to hold for 5 years or more, would want to re-assess CLH at $34 and below.

Nasdaq 100 Watch List: January 23, 2015

U.S. Dividend Watch List: January 23, 2015

Top Five Watch List Performance Review

In our ongoing review of the NLO Dividend Watch List, we have taken the top five stocks on our list from January 24, 2014 and have checked the performance one year later. The top five companies on that list can be seen in the table below.

Symbol Name 2013 Price 2014 Price % change
PM Philip Morris International 81.50 82.82 1.6%
TGT Target Corp. 57.72 75.29 30.4%
T AT&T Inc 33.42 33.37 -0.1%
MCD McDonald's Corp. 94.43 89.56 -5.2%
WRB W.R. Berkley Corporation 40.18 49.90 24.2%
      Average 10.2%
         
DJI Dow Jones Industrial 15,879.11 17,672.60 11.3%
SPX S&P 500 1,790.29 2,051.82 14.6%

Watch List Review

Our top five kept pace with the Dow but lagged the S&P 500 by 4%. The best performer was Target (TGT). The stock was under tremendous pressure a year ago after the data breach but our team believed that it was a one-time event and took a sizable position. Expectations for Target were so low at the time that we believed all the bad news was priced into the stock.

The worst performer was McDonald (MCD) seemingly due to a drop in earnings by -8% in 2014. However, analyst estimate that net income will rise by +10% going forward, from $4.82 to $5.32. That places a forward P/E at 17x 2015 earnings.

An insurance company, W.R. Berkley (WRB), did well with a gain of +24%. Net income rose +21.5% for the year but what may have propelled the stock higher was the special dividend paid out at the end of 2014.

U.S. Dividend Watch List: January 16,2015

Although a volatile week, it turned out to be a great one for the bulls. The market had a solid gain of +3%. Despite the move higher, there are virtually the same number of companies on our watch list as last week. Pockets of weakness can be seen in several sectors on our list. Below are 27 companies on our watch list. Continue reading

Gold Stock Indicator: January 23, 2015

Gold, as represented by the SPDR Gold Shares (GLD), increased +1.89% this week while the Philadelphia Gold and Silver Stock Index (XAU) declined by-0.18%.  On a closing basis, each index made new highs this week.  However, some ground was given up on Friday.

image

2014 Performance Review

Below is a chart of how our investment portfolio performed against the S&P 500 index and the 30-year Treasury based on the January 2, 2014 rate (found here).

image

Analyst Estimates: U.S. Dividend Watch List

Below are the price projections based on analyst earnings estimates for the stocks on our recent U.S. Dividend Watch List dated January 16, 2015.  These estimates project the price change for the respective stocks by the end of 2015.

U.S. Dividend Watch List: January 16, 2015

Top Five Watch List Performance Review

In our ongoing review of the NLO Dividend Watch List, we have taken the top five stocks on our list from January 17, 2014 and have checked the performance one year later. The top five companies on that list can be seen in the table below.

Symbol Name 2013 Price 2014 Price % change
TGT Target Corp. 60.24 74.94 24.4%
PM Philip Morris International 83.33 82.70 -0.8%
T AT&T Inc 33.70 33.80 0.3%
TEG Integrys Energy Group Inc 53.64 80.59 50.2%
ED Consolidated Edison 53.96 69.10 28.1%
      Average 20.4%
         
DJI Dow Jones Industrial 16,458.56 17,511.57 6.4%
SPX S&P 500 1,838.70 2,019.42 9.8%

Watch List Review

Our top five outperformed the market by a wide margin. The biggest contribution came from the utility sector. The search for yield has driven shares of Integrys Energy (TEG) and Consolidated Edison (ED) up by +50% and +28%, respectively. Interestingly, shares of Philip Morris (PM) and AT&T (T) which yielded above 4.5% didn't fair too well and were virtually flat for the year. Another exceptional performer was Target (TGT) which was hit with bad news about a data hack, at the time. As we mentioned one year ago, we believed the news provided long-term investors with great opportunity to buy shares at discount.

U.S. Dividend Watch List: January 16,2015

It was a tough week to navigate the market as volatility spiked with surge in Swiss Franc which took the market by surprise. The Swiss Franc jumped by nearly +30% against the euro and +18% against the dollar after the Swiss National Bank's decision to eliminate the cap it placed on the value of the Franc. We believe that a "black swan" type of event such as this creates volatility in favor long-term investor. At the end of the week, there are 89 companies to search through. However, we've filtered out some companies and have displayed 39 below. Continue reading

Gold Stock Indicator: January 16, 2015

If you like excitement and intrigue then invest in gold.  However, if you want a heart pounding adrenaline rush then try investing in gold stocks.  This past week, gold did nothing but go up, closing out the week with a gain of over +4%.  Gold stocks, on the other hand, tested the fortitude of investors by falling more than –6% but eventually closing up nearly +3%.

image

The recent surge of gold was due to the Swiss National Bank’s decision to remove the cap on the Swiss Franc.  Many are calling the Swiss decision a turning point in the bear market for gold.  However, we’d want to remind investors that the turning point, if in fact it is the ultimate low for gold, was on November 5, 2014.  That was the time and place when the low was established before increasing in value.

image

Bitcoin Plunges, Downside Target $125

On January 14, 2015, Bitcoin declined as low as $170 per U.S. dollar.  This comes three months after our October 7, 2014 article titled, “Bitcoin: Speculators Unite…” in which we proposed the following:

“with an increase in price from $99.81 to $1,147.25, participants should always step back and reassess the situation.  The reason why is because there have been few instances where a parabolic increase in price is sustained in the form of a new plateau.  With this consideration in mind, we believed that the prospects of the downside targets, dismal as they seemed at such heights, were a distinct reality.”

However, the nature of the October 7, 2014 piece implied that the price of Bitcoin was headed higher.  Little did we know that the actual trajectory would be a continuation of the declining trend.  Since the October 5th low, Bitcoin was only able to increase by as much as +33.66%.  Ultimately, the decline that ensued since October 5th has equaled –43.23%.

Below is the Edson Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines for Bitcoin with an updated chart.

image

All we can say is that the worst case scenario of $125 was always a distinct possibility.  A decline to the $125 level is now well within reach as the market for Bitcoin goes into panic mode.