Green Mountain Coffee Roasters: On Target

On May 19, 2015, we did a downside review of Green Mountain Coffee Roasters (GMCR) based on the work of Edson Gould.  At the time, GMCR was trading at $88.69.  Our downside assessment was as follows:

“As can be seen above, the price of GMCR has declined below the conservative and mid-range downside targets of $110.08 and $81.40.  The acceleration of the current decline seems to indicate that achieving the $52.71 extreme downside target is very likely.”

On August 6, 2015, GMCR declined as low as $52.40.  This falls well within the indications that were provided by Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines [SRL] at $52.71.  We closed our downside assessment of GMCR with the following comment:

“The fact that GMCR is prone to extreme moves up and down suggests that the extreme downside target is the point at which to start assessing risk and accumulating shares.”

Now that GMCR has fallen below the extreme downside target of $52.71, we think now is the time to review GMCR as a going concern for a potential transaction.

The Setup

Assuming that an investor is willing to accept total loss of funds, now is a great time to review the fundamentals of GMCR and determine if it will survive on its own or ultimately get acquired.  Below is the updated SRL based on the work of Edson Gould.

image

Our best guess is that buying GMCR in three stages on the way down is the most “prudent” approach.  For those interested in the stock but don’t like the prospect of catching a falling knife, we’ve outlined three potential starting points for investment at $40.66, $31.33 and $23.04.  We’d suggest investments of 50%, 25% and 25% of allotted funds.

Again, this recommendation is not for the faint of heart.  Additionally, it is safest to assume all money put to this stock are a total loss and requires a significant amount of due diligence before any commitment is made.  From a historical standpoint, a  retest of the prior low ($17.25) is not unusual.

U.S. Dividend Watch List: July 31, 2015

The market rebounded this week with a gain of +1.2%. The S&P 500 appears to be consolidating as it trades sideways for nearly 6 months now. The volatility in the market is having a material effect on our watch list. We continue to see a large number of companies trading at or near their yearly low. There are many large blue-chip names to review on our list below. Continue reading

U.S. Dividend Watch List: July 24, 2015

Top Five Watch List Performance Review

In our ongoing review of the NLO Dividend Watch List, we have taken the top five stocks on our list from July 25, 2014 and have checked the performance one year later. The top five companies on that list can be seen in the table below.

Symbol Name 2013 Price 2014 Price % change
SCL Stepan 49.88 47.00 -5.8%
TR Tootsie Roll Industries Inc 27.31 31.64 15.9%
FCBC First Community Bancshares 13.60 17.84 31.2%
WWW Wolverine World Wide 24.27 28.81 18.7%
YORW The York Water Company 19.20 21.26 10.7%
      Average 14.1%
         
DJI Dow Jones Industrial 16,960.57 17,568.53 3.6%
SPX S&P 500 1,978.34 2,068.26 4.5%

Our top five gained an average of 14.1%. This far exceeded the market performance. The only company that failed to meet or exceed the market performance was Stepan (SCL) which fell -5.8%. The other four companies had gains ranging from +10.7% to +31.2%. Our commentary about Stepan and Tootsie Roll is worth reviewing. Regarding Stepan, we said the following:

When we look at the price level compared to various fundamental figures (cash flow, earning, and book value), you will see that price has risen far beyond the fundamental. From 2003 to 2013, the stock has risen around 17% on an annual basis. Compared that to 5.6% for cash flow, 13% for earning, 10% for bookvalue, and 5.5% for dividend. While stock purchased at the low will mark a better entrance than stock at the high, we think that this stock will have some catching up to do on the fundamental front.

As for Tootsie Roll (TR), we all know there isn't anything exciting to write about the company other than it managed to gain nearly +16% while the S&P 500 had risen only +4.5%. The stock of Tootsie Roll has always appears to be 'expensive' on P/E basis but time after time, the company manages to maintain a consistent level of appreciation. That may be due to the predictability of their revenue and profit. We stated that the stock was worth a look at the current price while making note that it wasn't a screaming buy.

U.S. Dividend Watch List: July 24,2015

It was a train wreck for the market this week as the S&P 500 fell -2.2% while Industrial average lost nearly -3%. For those with cash on the sidelines, this is music to their ears. A pullback in the market will allow long-term investors to accumulate assets and utilize our dividend watch list to position themselves for income investing. Continue reading

Dow’s Theory on What exactly is an Industrial Stock

Charles H. Dow defines what Industrials stocks are

"The stocks of trust companies and banks are simply industrial stocks... (Dow, Charles H.Wall Street Journal. Review and Outlook. October 12, 1900)."

Chesapeake Energy is on Target

On April 26, 2012, we posted an article titled “A Warning For Chesapeake Energy Stockholders”.  In that article we said the following:

“While it appears that Chesapeake Energy  (CHK) has seen all the punishment that could possibly lay ahead, we’re concerned that the previous technical pattern in the period from 1993 to 1999 is about to repeat.”

The period from 1993 to 1999 saw (CHK) decline from as high as $27 to under $1.00.  The 2012 article was written when CHK was at $18.10 and had already fallen more than –66%.  So far, CHK is on track to replicate the decline achieved from 1993-1999.  The next downside target for Chesapeake Energy is $4.50.

image

IBM: A Value Investor’s Delight

In April 2012, we published an article titled, “What Does Warren Buffett See In IBM?”  At the time we concluded the article with the following thought:

“…just imagine what IBM will look like after falling to a 52-week low.”

A reader of our article took exception to the idea of IBM declining in price with the remark:

“I have no idea why you think you could buy IBM on a 52 week low. There is nothing fundamental about the company that would lead one to think that might happen. IBM is a difficult company to short because people who own it primarily intend to hold it for a longer term, do not trade on margin, and do not sell their shares based on fear (Momintn. What Does Warren Buffett See in IBM? April 19, 2015. link.).”

Since our article, IBM has declined from $207 to $161 with upside movement being limited to $213.

image

In spite of the price decline of nearly –22% since 2012, IBM has increased the dividend by +53%.   This has resulted in a situation where the price of IBM has becomes very compelling from a value perspective.  As indicated in our original article on IBM, the growth of the dividend has become an overpowering force which is creating a stock that could eclipse all expectation for long-term investors.  This leaves aside the topic of IBM share repurchases which Warren Buffett discussed in his 2011 shareholder letter.

Our premise of IBM’s valuation is narrowly perched on the work of Edson Gould’s Altimeter.  Below is an update of Gould’s Altimeter since our April 2012 article.

image

According to Gould’s Altimeter, IBM is now undervalued below the levels of the 2008 low.  We think that a value investor would have fun pouring over the data to determine the actual value of IBM.   Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines [SRL] indicate that the conservative downside target for IBM is $130.  However, we think a process of accumulation at the current price, and below, is a prudent long-term strategy.

Canadian Dividend Watch List: July 2015

Performance Review

Below is the performance of the Canadian Dividend Watch List from July 2013:

symbol name 2013 2015 % chg
D-UN.TO Dundee REIT 31.77 24.7 -22.25%
REI-UN.TO Riocan Real Estate Investment Trust 25.11 27.06 7.77%
CUF-UN.TO Cominar REIT 20.83 17.97 -13.73%
CAR-UN.TO Canadian Apartment Properties REIT 22.31 28.45 27.52%
CWT-UN.TO Calloway REIT 26.09 30.17 15.64%
AX-UN.TO Artis Real Estate Investment Trust 15.1 13.68 -9.40%
IFC.TO Intact Financial Corporation 57.53 90.17 56.74%
FCR.TO First Capital Realty Inc. 17.79 18.29 2.81%
FTS.TO Fortis Inc. 32.34 36.99 14.38%
BEI-UN.TO Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust 60.3 59.78 -0.86%
EMA.TO Emera Inc. 33.75 42.55 26.07%
LB.TO Laurentian Bank of Canada 45.05 48 6.55%
TRP.TO TransCanada Corp. 46.77 49.34 5.49%
FTT.TO Finning International Inc. 22.68 21.9 -3.44%
NA.TO National Bank Canadian Equity SP 36.14 45.51 25.93%
CM.TO Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce 77.15 91.18 18.19%

The average return for the entire watch list was +9.84% compared to the Toronto Stock Exchange Composite index change of +13.33% in the period from July 19, 2013 to July 22, 2015.  At the time, we said the following of the watch list:

“We recommend careful examination of the listed companies in the REIT arena as they have less upside potential than is ideal.”

Since July 2013, the REIT related companies on the watch list generated a return of +0.94% while companies not in the REIT sector gained an average of +18.94%.

July 2015 Canadian Dividend Watch List

Below is the Canadian stocks of interest:

Gold Stock Indicator: July 17, 2015

Since June 29, 2015, the price of gold has declined –3.67% while the gold and silver stock index (XAU) declined -15.19%.

image

The recent declines are nothing compared to the full extent of the carnage that has been witnessed since the 2010 peak in gold stocks which have fallen –76%.  Meanwhile, the price of gold from the 2011 peak has declined -40.22%.

image

This decline is very much similar to the percentage declines experienced in the period from 1974 to 1976 when gold fell –44% and gold stocks fell –68%.

image

The following two quotes from Richard Russell (near the low in the gold market) seem appropriate given the current market conditions:

“The great fortunes have been made in the market by buying shares that no one wanted. S. African golds are nearing that point now. For those willing to "buy'em and put'em away," for those willing to write off a possible loss against a possible major gain, many of the marginal S. African gold shares are interesting now (Russell, Richard. Dow Theory Letters. April 2, 1976. page 6.).”

“In August of 1975 the golds fell out of the triangle and entered into one of the worst bear market collapses I have ever seen. By mid-1976 about 75% of all gold mine values were wiped out. Guessing at bear market bottoms for stock groups is always a hazardous occupation. Certainly, the action of the last month must be considered a panic in gold shares.  Bear markets often end with downside panic action. Therefore, in view of the time element of the bear market, the severity of the recent chaotic panic action, and the current gold pessimism, I am guessing that we will see the lows for most gold shares in this area. But I would say that holding gold shares is an uninteresting proposition unless relative strength for the group turns bullish. It hasn’t yet (Russell, Richard. Dow Theory Letters. July 30, 1976. page 5.).”

Quote of the Day: Robert Rodriguez

“The problems of tomorrow are being created today as we write this letter. Furthermore, there are risks in the balance sheets that we cannot see. Companies such as Fannie Mae (FNM), Freddie Mac (FRE) and American International Group (AIG) are now showing financial strains from previous actions taken to enhance the look of their financial reports. We are also concerned that many of these companies have used financial derivatives that are totally unanalyzable by outsiders, since there is insufficient information disclosed in their financial statements for a risk assessment.”

Robert L. Rodriguez. Letter to Shareholders. April 16, 2005. Page 4.

  • Fannie Mae: Bailed Out/Bankrupt 2008
  • Freddie Mac: Bailed Out/Bankrupt 2008
  • AIG: Bailed Out 2008

U.S. Dividend Watch List: July 10, 2015

Top Five Watch List Performance Review

In our ongoing review of the NLO Dividend Watch List, we have taken the top five stocks on our list from July 11, 2014 and have checked the performance one year later. The top five companies on that list can be seen in the table below.

Symbol Name 2013 Price 2014 Price % change
ROST Ross Stores 32.90 50.86 54.6%
FCBC First Community Bancshares 14.14 18.39 30.1%
SCL Stepan 52.80 50.50 -4.4%
CHFC Chemical Financial Corp. 27.49 33.21 20.8%
WWW Wolverine World Wide 26.00 29.15 12.1%
      Average 22.6%
         
DJI Dow Jones Industrial 16,943.81 17,760.41 4.8%
SPX S&P 500 1,967.57 2,076.62 5.5%

The top five companies combined for an average gain of +22.6%, far exceed the performance of the market. The biggest gainer was Ross Stores (ROST) which gained +54.6%, split adjusted. The worse performer was Stepan (SCL) which lost -4.4% over the year.

U.S. Dividend Watch List: July 10, 2015

This week, we highlight 27 companies that are on our dividend watch list. Continue reading

Dow’s Theory on Growth

Charles H. Dow says slow and steady wins the race

"Confidence has to be earned and has been truthfully pronounced a plant of slow growth (Dow, Charles H. Wall Street Journal. Review and Outlook. October 12, 1900)."

National Dairy Products: 1927-1937

The chart below highlights two issues:

1) How long did it take for a stock to get to breakeven?

In the case of National Dairy Products, the stock did not get to breakeven by the 1937 peak. National Dairy declined approximately -90% in price from 1929 to 1933.  From late 1933, National Dairy rose as much as +180% to the 1936 peak. 

2) What happened to the dividend during the stock market crash and "Great" Depression?

In spite of the market decline from the 1929 peak, National Dairy’s earnings continued higher by the end of 1930.  Once earnings started to slide in 1931, the pace of dividends continued to move higher.  In 1932, it became apparent to management that the dividend policy had to be reduced.  The pace of the decline in dividends tracked closely the decline in earnings.  However, when earnings started to increase, the dividend was not pushed higher until two years after the trend reversed in earnings.

The change in dividend policy is a great example of management’s expectation of future prospects.  However, when a policy of cutting the dividend started, in 1932, most dividend investors were probably becoming fearful of the prospects going forward and reacted by selling their stock.  In reality, 1932-1933 was the time to start accumulating shares of the stock.

image

Nasdaq 100 Watch List: June 26, 2015

Below is the performance of the stocks from our June 20, 2014 Nasdaq 100 watch list compared to the Nasdaq 100 Index gain of +17.84% over the last year.

Symbol 2014 2015 actual chg
LMCA 35.07 37.26 6.24%
WFM 39.22 40.35 2.88%
COST 115.36 138.06 19.68%
BBBY 60.07 71.11 18.38%
SPLS 11.19 16.05 43.43%
FOSL 105.6 71.79 -32.02%
VRSK 60.46 74.51 23.24%
ROST 33.65 50.27 49.39%
DLTR 53.68 81.66 52.12%
EBAY 49.34 61.03 23.69%
DISCA 37.71 33.84 -10.26%
CA 28.73 29.89 4.04%
NTAP 35.79 32.36 -9.58%

Below is the analyst estimates from last year compared to the actual performance of the stocks.

image

At the extremes we see that Liberty Media (LMCA), Whole Foods (WFM), Fossil (FOSL), Discovery Communications (DISCA) and NetApp (NTAP) went in opposite directions of the analysts.  At the same time, the expectations for the remaining stocks didn’t quite come as close as anticipated.  The lone exception is Ebay (EBAY) which was expected to gain +16.34% as opposed to +23.69% of actual change.

Nasdaq 100 Watch List

Below is the latest list of stocks that we believe present the best investment opportunities from the Nasdaq 100 Index.

U.S. Dividend Watch List: June 26, 2015

Top Five Watch List Performance Review

In our ongoing review of the NLO Dividend Watch List, we have taken the top five stocks on our list from June 27, 2014 and have checked the performance one year later. The top five companies on that list can be seen in the table below.

Symbol Name 2013 Price 2014 Price % change
ROST Ross Stores 32.90 50.27 52.8%
SCL Stepan 52.35 55.00 5.1%
C Citigroup Inc 47.14 56.34 19.5%
WWW Wolverine World Wide 26.19 29.34 12.0%
FCBC First Community Bancshares 14.38 18.52 28.8%
      Average 23.6%
         
DJI Dow Jones Industrial 16,851.84 17,946.68 6.5%
SPX S&P 500 1,960.96 2,101.61 7.2%

Out top five companies surpassed the market performance by a wide margin. The overall gain was +23.60% compared with +7.20% for the S&P 500.

Ross Stores (ROST) was the largest contributor with a +52.8% gain. ROST also did a 2-to-1 split on June 12th of this year. Our assessment of Ross was inaccurate when we said that the stock doesn't have enough margin of safety at the current level. However, we may have identified a key attribute for stocks that may outperform the market. One of the biggest takeaway is the fact that ROST raised its dividend by +17% while maintaining a low payout ratio of 19%. The fact that the dividend yield was only 1.12% confirms our theory that the dividend growth and sustainability is more important than absolute yield.

Of the top five, Stepan (SCL) was the worst performer. The street had an optimistic view of the stock and expected it to grow net income by +36%. This made Stepan's forward P/E of 9 very attractive. However, that all depended on one important fact, that the net income must rise by more than a third. Because the stock was trading at its 5-year high on P/E, any earnings miss would not be good. When Stepan reported earnings in October 2014, the street expected EPS to come in at $0.89 but the actual result was $0.68. The stock fell from $52 to $38. Next, the inevitable event occurred, analysts revised their estimate downward.  Stepan's EPS came in at $0.38 in the February quarter, above the street's estimate of $0.35. Three months later, EPS came in at $0.90 when the street's estimate was $0.68. Shares rose back from $38 to $55. SCL_6.27.2015

U.S. Dividend Watch List: June 26, 2015

There are 33 companies on our watch list. Continue reading

Gold Stock Indicator: June 26, 2015

Since our last Gold Stock Indicator posting, the price of gold has increased <1% while the Philadelphia Gold and Silver Stock Index (XAU) declined –4.49%.

image

Below are is the GSI for Barron’s Gold Mining Index from 1973 and XAU Index from 1983.  Based on these two charts, an investors can easily discern where we are from a valuation perspective.