U.S. Dividend Watch List: April 7, 2017

Previous Year Performance Review

In our ongoing review of the NLO Dividend Watch List, we have taken the top five stocks on our list from April 8, 2016 and have checked the performance one year later. The top five companies on that list can be seen in the table below.

Symbol Name 2015 Price 2016 Price % change
STBA S&T BanCorp. 24.29 33.68 38.7%
THFF First Financial Corp. 32.08 46.75 45.7%
WASH Washington Trust BanCorp. 35.83 49.10 37.0%
OKSB Southwest BanCorp. 14.55 25.60 75.9%
NPBC National Penn Bancshares 10.72 13.00 21.3%
      Average 43.7%
         
DJI Dow Jones Industrial 17,576.96 20,656.10 17.5%
SPX S&P 500 2,047.60 2,355.54 15.0%

The top five companies did exceptionally well with average gains of +43.70%. During the same period, the Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500 returned +17.50% and +15%, respectively. At the time, it was clear to us that the financial sector was the weakest of all industry groups judging by the number of companies belonging to the watch list. The following excerpt was taken from our post last year.

There are too many banks on the list to focus on so anyone interested in taking a early stake in the sector should consider ETFs such as XLF or VFH as the low may not be in yet.  The Wall Street Journal published a good piece on the sector titled, Miserable Year for Banks: Stocks Suffer as Rates Stay Low.

Those ETFs mentioned above (XLF and VFH) returned +32% in one year.

In addition to the financials, we pointed out two companies in the agriculture sector to watch out for, they were Monsanto (MON) and Lindsay (LNN) which returned +34% and +27%, respectively. We said the following about these two companies:

Two companies in the agricultural sectors are trading near their yearly low and worth a look.  Monsanto (MON) and Lindsay (LNN) may have not reached their respective "bottoms" but one should start research at these levels to identify their respective intrinsic values. Our valuation models suggest a possible downside risk of -30% for both companies. How likely are they to reach that level is to be seen. However, one can never pick the exact bottom of the stock price and multiple purchases is a great strategy to deploy. Because Lindsay (LNN) was on our list last year and remain in the same position, we interpret this as a potential bottoming process in the company.

U.S Dividend Watch List: April 7, 2017

The market continues to trade in a tight range between 2,300 and 2,350. We'll have to see if it can hold the 2,300 level and possibly retest 2,400. Despite being near an all-time high, we continue to seek long-term investments at a reasonable price and below are 28 companies you should consider. Continue reading

Craft Brew Alliance Meets Our Target

On September 1, 2016, we said the following of Craft Brew Alliance (BREW):

“Although there is no assurance that the stock needs to decline to the referenced downside targets, any parabolic move must be watch closely as entropy will kick in at some point.  In this case, we believe that the ascending conservative target [$12.57] is a lock.  With established history as an indication, the mid-range target [$10.02] looks to be a safe “bet” as well.  We’ll check back in on this as more time has passed.”

We don’t necessarily believe it but here we are, with BREW at a price of $13.15 and well within the range of the conservative downside target set at $12.57 as established in our piece dated September 1, 2016.

image

The September 1, 2016 article lays the groundwork for what a person interested in BREW should look for and expect.

Market Speaking Volumes

Volume Review

In a Dow Theory Q&A piece dated April 8, 2013, we said the following of stock market trading volume:

“The lack of trading volume in the stock market since 2009 reflects little or no participation on the part of the public.  If this is true, then any meaningful rise in trading volume (on the buying side) due to added participation from the public could result in tremendous gains.  This thought sits in the back of our mind as we strategize the best way to take advantage while not being over exposed.”

The story on trading volume is somewhat murky, sometimes it matters and sometimes it doesn’t.  Learning to discern the two can be frustrating.  However, it is hoped that our work on the topic will help provide proper perspective.

Taking a step back, our prior work in trading volume should be reviewed critically.  Below are key articles that touch on the topic with the March 13, 2013 piece being, in our view, the most important real-time article on the subject:

Taking the Plunge

What is the best way to describe how trading volume has changed in the last eight years?  We would equate trading volume to the preparatory stages of what would be considered a successful competitive dive into a swimming pool.  There are three stages to a successful dive: 1) touchdown 2) maximum depression 3) takeoff.

image

In the stock market, the “touchdown” in trading volume occurred in late September 2009 as the Dow Jones Industrial Average was in the recovery stage of largest stock market decline since the 1973 fall of –45%.  The “maximum depression” stage of trading volume lasted from the period of late September 2009 to mid-September 2014.  In terms of “liftoff” in trading volume, nothing has rivaled the amount of change that has occurred from mid-September 2014 to the present.

image

On One Hand…

From all appearances, the stage is set for takeoff from a volume standpoint.  And yet, the stock market, as represented by the Dow Jones Industrial Average, since the 2009 low is already ranked seventh on the list of recoveries from prior crashes since 1835.  Can the market achieve the vaunted heights of 10 times the prior low as was the case in 1942 to 1966 or 1982 to 1997?  Considering that the period of the interest rate cycle corresponds to the 1942 period, we think there is a distinct possibility that “takeoff” is a possibility.

…On the Other Hand

As this has been the most hated bull market in history, which has seen it rise from 6,547 to as high as 21,115, or +223%, there are some elements that are cause for concern.  First, fulfilling the above three stages to takeoff are ultimately for successful dives.  Is the stock market setting up for a dramatic and steep dive?  Why would the stock market rise increase for 8 years on declining volume and suddenly spike on volume 3 times the 90-day average (No, it is not because of the Fed) in the last 4 months?

(Not So) Final Analysis

What would eliminate our questions about the nature of the current “liftoff” stage of volume? Well, we would have preferred a continuation of the stealth increase in volume that began in August 2014.  A stealth volume increases is far better because it would have continued the level of suspicion of the market increase.  Instead, parabolic increases fall into the category of pending and inexorable declines of large magnitude, after years of market gains.

How does an investor cope with the mixed signals of the market?  We believe that a concentration of assets is in order.  Pare down the non-staple holdings, focus on income and accept downside risk (we’re thinking semis, insurance and dollar stores).

Transaction Alert

On April 5, 2017, we executed the following transaction(s):

Gold SRL

On June 5, 2016, we said the following of gold:

“Upside resistance is at the ascending $1,055.42 level.  the current downside move looks to retest the previous move to the ascending $843.32 level.”

Breaking this down, we note where gold was at on June 5, 2016 on the accompanying chart.  At the time, gold had come off of a +17% spike in price from the December 17, 2015 low.  A run up to the ascending $1,055.42 level would have brought gold as high as $1,400.  The best that gold could do on the upside was $1,366.25 before falling back down to the ascending $843.32 level.

image

Where to Now?

Unemployment Rate: A Critical Juncture

On April 11, 2014, when the unemployment rate was pegged at 6.70%, we said the following:

Given our prior experience with Dow Theory and downside projections, any decline in the unemployment rate below 5.87%-5.90% would be exceptional with only the 4.40% and 3.80% levels as mere reflections of an overextended economic boom which should be followed by an equally impressive bust.

At the time, we had projected that the unemployment rate would fall to at least 5.90%.  Based on the reported data, we are indicated to be as low as 4.70%.

image

Continue reading

Gold Stock Indicator: March 2017

Performance Review

In the March 2016 posting on the Gold Stock Indicator (GSI), we said the following:

“As long as gold can stay above $1,184.25 and the XAU Index can stay above 57.96, the chances are that a new bull market in gold is in force.  Naturally, a decline below the most recent 1-year lows would erase any notion of a bull market in gold.  In spite of a decline below 38.84, the XAU Index is at the most extreme in terms of value.  With the assumption that the future will see an oversupply of commodities (a further collapse in prices), investors and speculators who are not averse to a high risk portion of their portfolio should consider investment in gold stocks.  First time investors in this sector should start with a position in Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX), and then wait.”

Since that early March 2016 posting, the price of gold stocks (as represented by the XAU Gold and Silver Stock Index) have increased as much as +78.16% while settling at the current level of +26%. 

image

Meanwhile, the Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has ranged as high as +61% while falling as low as –2.21% and currently sits at a gain of +16% since our March 2016 posting.

image

One year later and the tale of the market for gold and gold stocks is told in the chart below. 

image

We see that there has been a lot of volatility in the last year but little in the way of change for the price of gold while gold stocks have made some marginal gains.  This is where analysis and interpretation are key.

Nasdaq 100: March 2017

Performance Review

Looking back at the watch list from March 2016, we can see that the first five stocks managed to eke out a modest gain of +6.33%.  This subset performance was severely below the Nasdaq 100 Index increase of +20.44%, in the same period of time.

symbol name 1-yr % chg
ESRX Express Scripts -4.21%
CERN Cerner Corporation 14.90%
BIIB Biogen Inc. 7.44%
VRTX Vertex Pharmaceuticals 11.28%
REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals 2.24%

When viewed from the perspective of the analysts (in blue), we see that the estimates for the coming year (at the time) were far short of the actual performance (in red) in the stock price as represented below.

image

According to Yahoo!Finance, there are seven analysts that track QVC Group (QVCA) are included in their analyst estimates.  It is worth considering, for additional research, finding the analyst(s) who were best able to  call QVC Group (QVCA).  Additionally, the same analyst(s) have a low expectation of $1.02 earnings and a high of $1.71 in earnings for the coming year, putting the stock price in a range of $20.40 to $34.20.  We believe that the analysts for QVCA have a good beat on this stock, let’s see if the same performance follows in the coming year.

Nasdaq 100 Watch List

Below is the watch list for March 2017 and the earnings estimates with the price projection based on those estimates as well as a strong interest stock.

Continue reading

U.S. Dividend Watch List: March 24, 2017

Prior Year Top Five Performance Review

In our ongoing review of the NLO Dividend Watch List, we have taken the top five stocks on our list from March 25, 2016 and have checked their performance one year later. The top five companies on that list can be seen in the table below.

Symbol Name 2015 Price 2016 Price % change
STBA S&T BanCorp. 25.26 33.61 33.1%
LLY Eli Lilly & 71.12 84.18 18.4%
AIG American International Group, Inc. 52.98 60.88 14.9%
GD General Dynamics Corp. 129.08 187.52 45.3%
WSBC WesBanco 28.70 35.79 24.7%
      Average 27.3%
         
DJI Dow Jones Industrial 17,515.73 20,596.72 17.6%
SPX S&P 500 2,035.94 2,343.98 15.1%

The average return for the top five companies from last year is +27.30% with the biggest gain coming from General Dynamics (GD). The company was trading at 14x net income last year when it appeared on the list. Fast forward to today, the stock is trading at nearly 20x net income so while net income rose only 5%, most of the gain came from multiple expansion. The worst performer was AIG (AIG) which gained +14.90% or 0.2% below the market.

U.S Dividend Watch List: March 24, 2017

The market fell -1.40% for the week with the S&P 500 is approaching 2,300. We'll take a flyer on the idea that a consolidation phase is occurring before any move up or down. Below is the watch list containing 26 companies on our dividend watch list. Continue reading

Musings on Real Estate

As investors, we’re firm believers in preparing for the worst case scenario.  For us, the definitive worst case scenario is found in the markets from 1921 to 1932, covering the early stages of the “Great” Depression.   We believe 1921 to 1932 should be examined and re-examined to understand possible risks and remedies for our current perspective on markets.

In our recent musings, we found that the rent data from 1914 to the present at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis had a minor quirk, some information was missing in the sweet spot that we’re most interested. Below is our take on the data and some minor insights.

Again, looking at the data related to the CPI for All Urban Consumers: Rent of Primary Residence (CUUR0000SEHA) on the St. Louis Federal Reserve website, we can see monthly data ranging from 1914 to the present.  However, the data in the period from 1915 to 1940 has many gaps that obscure what happened to rental prices (when attempting to chart).

The chart below is the maximum view of the data from 1914 to 2017.  The black boxes show, or rather don’t show, the data that is missing from the period in concern (also from 1944-1947).

image

Although there is some data interspersed from 1915 to 1940, there isn’t enough to generate a complete graphical representation of the period.  Below is the charting of the data for Residential Rents in St. Louis covering the period from 1875 to 1944 in work from Roy Wenzlick’s Real Estate Analyst.  We’ve highlighted the period of concern in red.

image

We wanted to know how accurate Wenzlick’s St. Louis residential rents compared to the national data provided by the Federal Reserve.  To do this, we took the 1914 data set and peg the percentage change in Wenzlick’s work to the missing data at the Fed through to 1940.  The result of this is displayed below:

image

In the red are the data points based on what would have happened if the starting point of December 2014 Fed data had the same rate of percentage change as Wenzlick’s graphical representation from 1914 to 1940.  In the blue, we have the original data set from the Federal Reserve.  We’ve extended the available Fed data from the prior period to fill the gaps.

Interestingly,  the percentage change from peak to trough in both data sets are fairly close with Wenzlick’s data declining –34.21% and the Fed data falling –38.43%.  The January 1923 and September 1924 peaks are consistent with our previous examination of other commodities.  For example, in our “1925 to 1932: A Question for Precious Metal Investors”  article, we see a 1925 peak in precious metal stocks with the decline ending in 1932.

image

As best we can tell, the gaps presented in the Federal Reserve data generally coincides with the data offered by Roy Wenzlick.  In addition, the data from both sources on the general direction of rents coincides with other commodity related declines from the period of 1923 to 1932.

The Definitive Dow Theory on Gold

Dow Theory attempts to define and identify major moves in markets referenced here as the “primary trend.”  In this piece, we will outline the price of gold according to Dow Theory.

We’re going to review and analyze the primary trend that extends from the September 2011 peak to the currently established low in the price of gold in December 2015.  We believe that this information is critical to understanding where we are and where we might be going.  This interpretation is based on the work of Charles H. Dow, co-founder of the Wall Street Journal and namesake to the longest continuous stock market indexes.

Keep in mind that all of the analysis that follows is done in generalities so that an individual who is curious about Dow Theory can refer to the technical manual on the topic titled The Dow Theory by Robert Rhea.  However, the true heart of Dow’s theory is found in his original writing which covered the topic of earnings, dividends, effect of dilution of shares and economic outlook AND NOT lines on a chart.  Two books that cover Charles H. Dow’s work as a fundamental analyst and an adept economist are titled Dow Theory: Unplugged and Charles H. Dow: Economist, respectively.

A Look Back

It is necessary to outline the history of primary trends in the price of gold to ensure clarity of where we are coming from and where we might be now.  Below is a graph of the price history of gold with the primary trends.

image

The dates for the primary trend indication are as follows:

  • December 1969 at $35.17
  • December 1974 at $188.25
  • August 1976 at $104.20
  • January 1980 at $760
  • August 1999 at $255.35
  • September 2011 at $1,895
  • December 2015 at $1,049.40

The percentage change for the primary trend indications above are as follows:

  • I: +435%
  • II: -45%
  • III: +629%
  • IV: -66%
  • V: +642%
  • VI: -45%

Dow Theory Primary Trend Analysis at VI

U.S. Dividend Watch List: March 17, 2017

The S&P 500 appears to be consolidating between 2,350 and 2,400. We will be looking to see if the bull can push above 2,400 level this week.

Although the stock market is virtually at its all-time high, the market fundamentals are comparable to last year. We observed the market multiple of 24x in September 2016 which is the same multiple we are seeing now.  One thing to note is rising interest rates during the same time frame.  The 10-year notes rose to 2.50% from 1.60%, a staggering +56% increase in rate. However, at the same time the stock market is up more than +10%.

As the saying goes, a rising tide lifts all boats.  A bull market lifts all companies and there are only 20 companies on our watch list this week. Continue reading

Canadian Dividend Watch List: March 2017

Performance Review

A review of our watch list from March 2016 resulted in the following:

  • The entire list declined –1.71% versus analyst estimated gain of +23.10%
  • The top five companies on the list lost an average of –9.62%
  • The stock estimated by analysts to perform the worst (ThompsonReuters: TRI.TO) gained +14.63%
  • The stock estimated by analysts to perform the best (Dream Office REIT: D-UN.TO) lost –5.80%

These totals compare to the +15.36 change in the Toronto Stock Exchange in the same period of time.

Interest Rate Monitor

The markets are anticipating an interest rate increase at the next Federal Reserve meeting on economic policy and many could legitimately say that this anticipation is what drives the short-term rates higher. 

However, history is on our side on this matter.  As pointed out in previous postings, Federal Reserve rate policy always follows the actions of short-term rates as demonstrated in the last comparable cycle in interest rates from 1953 to 1980.

image

 

Silver Update

On May 5, 2011, when the iShares Silver Trust (SLV) was trading at $33.72, we said the following:

“…we’d like to see the price decline to the dashed blue line at $15.41 or below.”