Author Archives: nlo-admin

U.S. Dividend Watch List: August 7, 2020

The market is now just a few percentage points away from the all-time high set in February 2020. This test is a critical one for the S&P 500. However, our team will monitor that, as well as, the Dow Theory indicators as a true test of the market sentiment. With the market near the high rather than the low, there are only a handful of companies on our watch list this week. Continue reading

Income Bellwethers: September 2019

In September 2019, Morningstar.com published their DividendInvestor which contains their Income Bellwether Watchlist.  Below is the performance of the stocks based on the top highest and lowest dividend yield from August 9, 2019 to August 7, 2020.

image

As the data continues to demonstrate, low yield generally outperforms high yield.  This has been resoundingly shown in our Dogs of the Dow in the period from 1996 to 2019.

  • Of the stocks that beat the performance of the S&P 500 gain at +14.82%, 74% had dividend yields below that average yield of the entire watchlist.
  • The entire list of stocks gained +1.72%.
  • The conversion/merger of United Technologies marginally impacted return data.
  • Of note is the change in the performance by selecting the 2nd, 3rd, 4th stocks versus the top 3.
  • No group beat the S&P 500 which is severely affected by lopsided market weighting.
  • Top 10 low yield stocks beat the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

see also:

Dogs of the Dow: 1994

In our continued pursuit to gather data that contradicts our view that low yield stocks outperform the high yield stocks (aka Dogs of the Dow) as presented in Michael O’Higgins’ book Beating the Dow, we have obtained the performance of the top ten, top five, top three and the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th stocks in the high and low yield groups then contrasted their performance against the Dow Jones Industrial Average for the same year.

In this case, the year under consideration is 1994 and we have added the list of ten stocks and their price with the dividend yield.

image


1994 Data Breakdown

image

After reviewing the data and adjusting for splits, the Dogs of the Dow (High Yield stocks) again underperformed the Low Yield stocks.

Average Return 1991-1994

image

On average, from 1991 to 1994, the Low Yield stocks continue to outpace the Index and the High Yield (Dogs of the Dow) stocks at more than double the rate.

see also:

1920-2020: New York Times Inflation Reference Index

Below is the annual New York Times Inflation references from January 1920 to 2020.

image

See also:

Rising Secular Trend in Interest Rates

As we have long advocated, the declining trend in interest rates is coming to an end and the secular trend in rates is up.  To provide a decent level of analysis on what might happen going forward, we have a comparison of the Dow Jones Industrial Average to the 3-month Treasury from 1934 to the peak in May 1981.

image

Conventional wisdom says that as interest rates rise then stocks should underperform.  However, when contrasted to the interest rate sensitive Dow Jones Utility Average, we see that the index increased +1,321% from the April 1942 low to the March 1965 peak.

We contrast the change in the Dow Jones Utility Average to the 3-month Treasury to highlight what happened to the price of Silver in the same secular trend.

image

Historically, it is understood that rising interest rates mean rising commodity prices.  In the last secular trend, the price of silver increased modestly until, in the late stage of the cycle, all commodity prices go wild.  We believe that such a trend is likely to occur again.

Our general conclusion on the secular trend in rising interest rates is that the best alternative in the initial stages is stocks and commodities in late stage of the same trend.

For the past 25 years the commodity market and the stock market have moved almost exactly together. The index number representing many commodities rose from 88 in 1878 to 120 in 1881. It dropped back to 90 in 1885, rose to 95 in 1891, dropped back to 73 in 1896, and recovered to 90 in 1900. Furthermore, index numbers kept in Europe and applied to quite different commodities had almost exactly the same movement in the same time. It is not necessary to say to anyone familiar with the course of the stock market that this has been exactly the course of stocks in the same period ( source: Dow, Charles H. Review and Outlook. Wall Street Journal.February 21, 1901.)”

Margin Debit-Credit: August 2020

Below is the Year-Over-Year percentage change data from FINRA’s Margin Statistics.

image

see also: Margin Debit-Credit August 2019

Dogs of the Dow: 1993

In our continued pursuit to gather data that contradicts our view that low yield stocks outperform the high yield stocks (aka Dogs of the Dow) as presented in Michael O’Higgins’ book Beating the Dow, we have obtained the performance of the top ten, top five, top three and the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th stocks in the high and low yield groups then contrasted their performance against the Dow Jones Industrial Average for the same year.

In this case, the year under consideration is 1993 and we have added the list of ten stocks and their price with the dividend yield.

image


1993 Data Breakdown

image

This is the first year where High Yield stocks (Dogs of the Dow) exceeded the returns of the Low Yield stocks.

Average Return 1991-1993

image

The average return for the period from December 31, 1990 to December 31, 1993 continues to show the Low Yield stocks exceeding the index in each grouping.  However, the High Yield stocks are gaining ground with the top ten stocks failing to prove their ability to beat the Index.

see also:

Dogs of the Dow: 1992

In our continued pursuit to gather data that contradicts our view that low yield stocks outperform the high yield stocks (aka Dogs of the Dow) as presented in Michael O’Higgins’ book Beating the Dow, we have obtained the performance of the top ten, top five, top three and the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th stocks in the high and low yield groups then contrasted their performance against the Dow Jones Industrial Average for the same year.

In this case, the year under consideration is 1992 and we have added the list of ten stocks and their price with the dividend yield.

image


1992 Data Breakdown

image

For the second year in a row, the top ten stocks in the high yield category underperformed the Dow Jones Industrial Average AND the low yield category.

Average Return 1991-1992

image

The average return for the period from December 31, 1990 to December 31, 1992 highlights the strength of the low yield stocks.  However, for the top ten high yield stocks, they could not outperform the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

see also:

Dogs of the Dow: 1991

In our continued pursuit to gather data that contradicts our view that low yield stocks outperform the high yield stocks (aka Dogs of the Dow) as presented in Michael O’Higgins’ book Beating the Dow, we have obtained the performance of the top ten, top five, top three and the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th stocks in the high and low yield groups then contrasted their performance against the Dow Jones Industrial Average for the same year.

In this case, the year under consideration is 1991 and we have added the list of ten stocks and their price with the dividend yield.

image


1991 Data Breakdown

image

The data should be considered amazing because the exceptional yield that is offered by the high yield stocks (Dogs of the Dow) an investor generally foregoes nearly double the return.  Also notice that the high yield stocks had 4 of the ten companies on their list that failed (bankruptcy, forced liquidation) while only one company in ten on the low yield list has failed (so far).

see also:

Coppock Curve: July 2020

Last month, the Coppock Curve dipped into negative territory flagging us to closely monitor this indicator for a buy signal. In addition to monitoring the Dow Jones Industrial Average, we created a model to back test this strategy against individual stocks. So far, we are very satisfied with the outcome. Below is the current status of this indicator when we apply it to the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Continue reading

On This Date: Richard Russell

On this date, Richard Russell of the Dow Theory Letters, said the following:

"Wall Street wisdom tells us that the most bullish thing the market can do is advance to new highs.

"Wrong--the most bullish thing a stock average can do is rally to a new high confirmed with the other averages and breadth. But that’s not what has been happening. The recent Dow/S&P highs were not confirmed by the Transports, the Utilities or the advance-decline ratio. In other words, the Dow/S&P advance to new highs was extremely “arrow, which is fine for people holding a handful of the stronger blue-chip stocks but frustrating, if not costly, for those holding a representative portfolio of stocks."

-Russell, Richard. Dow Theory Letters. July 29, 1998. Letter 1257. page 1.

image

Primary Trend Indicator 1980-1989

Below is the Richard Russell’s Primary Trend Indicator (PTI) from inception in 1980-1989.

image

see also: PTI from 1972-1979

Primary Trend Indicator 1972-1979

Below is the Richard Russell’s Primary Trend indicator from inception in 1972 to 1979.

image

Tech Stock References 1980-2020

Below is Barron’s references to “tech stocks” relative to the July 1st closing price of the Nasdaq Composite Index from 1980 to 2020.

image

see also: New York Times Recession/Depression Index 1853-2018

Krugman: Right or Wrong?

Source

Krugman, Paul R. "Mexicans Send Message with Votes, but the Results may Not be what they Hope." Los Angeles Times. Jul 24, 1988, page 2.

Claims

  • "Dragged down by a massive burden of foreign debt, buffeted by declining oil prices and given an earthquake as a final insult, Mexico had shown little economic growth since 1982."
  • "The standard of living of ordinary workers had fallen by half."
  • "The sinking peso had fed an inflationary spiral that had taken the inflation rate in a country once proud of its price stability into triple digits."
  • "Salinas and his team must succeed in controlling inflation; they must translate that inflationary success into political success that gives them the power to pursue economic liberalization; they must then fairly quickly deliver results in terms of economic growth that validate their economic program."

Prediction

"Is anyone in the U.S. government prepared to take the lead? Or will we drift, hoping that Mexico's problems will go away, or at least wait until January [1989]? If we do, we risk a foreign policy disaster that will make our Central American worries look trivial."

Outcome

  1. “In its largest loan ever made to a debt-pressed nation, the United States said today that it would grant Mexico up to $3.5 billion to help it cope with reduced revenues resulting from the plunge in oil prices. The short-term loan is intended to tide over Mexico, which depends heavily on oil exports, for a few months until it can get longer loans of similar magnitude from the big multinational lending agencies, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. (Kilborn, Peter T. “Mexico to receive up to $3.5 Billion as loan from U.S.” New York Times. Oct 18, 1988. page A1.).

see also: Mexican Peso Crisis