Author Archives: nlo-admin

Bitcoin: February 5, 2018

If you’re holding Bitcoin at this point, it is because you are confortable with the projected downside target of $6,684.31 to $5,802.91.

image

Since December 22, 2017, Bitcoin has had these downside targets.  Worth noting is that the rise from the low to the December 2017 peak is equal to the 2011 low to the 2013 peak on a percentage basis.  We’re within striking distance of the exact same percentage decline from the April 2013 peak to the July 2013 low.

image

In the period after the 2013 peak, it is worth noting the “Dow Theory” retest of the 68.36 low at the 66.86 level.  This indicates that whenever the current ultimate low is achieved, there will be an initial spike, not to exceed half of the prior decline, then another decline back to the established low. 

Traders will make lots of money on this “dead cat” bounce.  Alternatively, those willing to accept the downside risk will know they can buy again at a preferable low without all the hysteria attached.

U.S. Dividend Watch List: February 2, 2018

There are some who have described the recent market pullback as "market crash" or "blood bath." Yes the decline is large but to put things into perspective, the market (S&P 500) has risen +47% for the past 2 years. This equates to an annualized return of +23.50% which is close to the return of the best investor in the world, Warren Buffett. The pullback should be expected and welcoming for a healthy bull market. Should one choose to utilize this pullback as an entry point, we urge our reader to start with high quality companies which have consistent dividend payments, as listed below.

Continue reading

The Power and Lessons of Speed Resistance Lines

We are not big fans of charting as a means to make decisions about where the price of a stock or index will go. However, when a charting strategy has a high level of consistency while taking away our own person bias, we have to dig a little deeper.  This is a general overview of the incredible forecasting power and the practical investment lessons that we’ve experienced while employing Speed Resistance Lines.

Speed Resistance Lines, as demonstrated by the writing of Edson Gould, have been of significant aid in tempering our enthusiasm for a stock or index, especially when applied to targeting downside levels.  Within the context of the current bull market since 2009, we’ve seen a large majority of the stocks achieve the conservative downside target (more SRLs we’ve run here).  This means that even when we thought we selected the right stocks to apply to the SRL, we have been wrong.

Below are the earliest three examples of Speed Resistance Lines (SRL) that we introduced with the focus on downside targets.  The first SRL we will review is the Dow Jones Industrial Average from 1949 to 1975. The second SRL is for the Philadelphia Gold and Silver Stock Index (XAU) from 1998 to 2016.  The last one is Netflix (NFLX) from 2007 to 2013.

sources:

  • Scheinman, William X. “1966 and All That: One Stock Market Analyst Sees Some Ominous Parallels Today”. Barron's. March 17, 1969. pg. 5.
  • Scheinman, William X. “600 on the Dow?” Barron's. February 9, 1970. pg. 5.
  • Scheinman, William X. “May to December: The Bear Market, Says One Analyst, Will Hit Bottom This Winter”. Barron's. August 24, 1970. pg. 5.

DJIA: Downside Targets

Based on the nature of the decline in the market on February 2, 2018, it is worth examining the downside targets for the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA).  Below are the downside targets based on the work of Edson Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines.

What If You Don’t Know or Care About Investing?

After we wrote our posting “Work Smart, Not Hard,” many individuals have made the obvious remark, “it sounds good in theory, but how can a person like me, who has no interest or knowledge in stocks, the stock market or investing, get nearly +7% compounded over time?”

We’ll default to the most famous investor in the history of modern time, Warren Buffett.  According to Buffett:

“Over the 35 years, American business has delivered terrific results. It should therefore have been easy for investors to earn juicy returns: All they had to do was piggyback Corporate America in a diversified, low-expense way. An index fund that they never touched would have done the job (Buffett, Warren. Berkshire Hathaway Annual Report. February 28, 2005. page 4.).”

There you have it.  If you have no interest in following the stock market, stocks or investing, then all you need to do is buy the S&P Index Fund, preferably a “low cost” fund.  Start at the Consumer Reports link and pick one and do the same in your retirement accounts at work.

image

Read our article titled “Work Smart, Not Hard” showing how compound interest is the key to your financial success.

image

Bitcoin: February 1, 2018

On December 22, 2017, we said the following of Bitcoin:

  • “We believe that there is going to be limited upside in the near term.”
  • “We think that the conservative downside target ($6,884.31) will be achieved before a new high is seen.”
  • “In all prior booms, the subsequent bust AVERAGED –70% (data found here).”

Below is the updated chart for Bitcoin along with our expected downside target.

Gold Stock Indicator: January 2018

On September 17, 2017, we said the following:

“We’re still in the diabolical no-man’s land where, according to Dow Theory, the previous trend (bear market) is in place until proven otherwise.”

The price of gold continues to confound even the most bullish gold analyst.  However, as we can see below, it is make-or-break time for the precious metal.

Nasdaq 100 Watch List: January 2018

Performance Review

Below is the performance of the Nasdaq 100 watch list from January 25, 2017 compared to the analyst estimates for the respective stocks.

image

Although we expect that the analysts will miscalculate which stocks will do the best, it is necessary to actually see how the stocks did in comparison.  We’re not seeking an exact match in the performance expectations, just that the general trend was correct. 

For example, the analysts got the expectations of Gilead (GILD) and Mylan (MYL) generally corrects.  However, the analysts projected equivalent gains that did not exceed that of the Nasdaq 100 index at +34.90%.  Likewise, the analysts projected a significant loss for Vodafone (VOD) while the stock was among the top performers on the list.

Looking at the performance from the following respective categories helps to narrow down the best strategy to apply when we don’t know which stocks to select.  Below is the performance based on the top three stocks in the respective categories:

image

None of the listed categories managed to beat the Nasdaq 100 index (NDX) in the last year.  However, there is still a lot to learn from the ranking of performance.  As with our Dogs of the Dow studies, the conventional wisdom keeps getting overturned with the low p/e and low p/b stocks underperforming the high p/e and high p/b stocks.  We believe that there is a perfect explanation for this as we have outlined in our recent studies posted on our site.

Nasdaq 100 Watch List January 2018

GE Altimeter

Below is the historical range of the Altimeter for General Electric (GE) from 1962 to the present.  The green line represents the mean, which sits at the 143.5 level.  If GE were to achieve the historical high of the range then the stock would be priced at $22.44.  That would be a +37.84% increase to the all-time high of the longstanding range.  Meanwhile, the downside risk, based on the Altimeter, is $11.76 or a decline of –27.76%.  A declining stock price with a rising Altimeter is not a good sign.

image

Sears Holdings: “Going Concern” Update

On March 21, 2017, Sears Holdings issued the following statement in their 2016 annual report:

“Our historical operating results indicate substantial doubt exists related to the Company's ability to continue as a going concern (page 48).”

If you were to invest in a company, would you consciously put your money into a stock that executives have to say something like this?  Naturally, a company needs to cover their tracks with commentary that dampens over enthusiasm for stock investors.  To contrast our bias against SHLD, we looked at the 2016 annual report for Target (TGT).  Nowhere is there any indication of a “going concern” risk expressed by management.  Maybe TGT is in denial or maybe Sears Holdings management is onto something.

Guess what happens when a company is honest about the risks to their viability?  Well, in the short term, the stock jumped over +52% from March 21, 2017 to April 19, 2017.  Even better was the increase of +101% after our February 10, 2017 article titled “Sears CEO: ‘We’re Cutting Costs, Ignore Conflict of Interest’” to the April 19, 2017 peak.  The more speculative traders out there probably didn’t believe the CEO but saw the short squeeze opportunity that was available and profited handsomely.

However, time is the arbiter of truth, and not even one year later we see that Sears Holdings (SHLD) is finding its footing at a price that is more reflective of a company that has “substantial doubts” about their “ability to continue as a going concern.” As of January 26, 2018, SHLD has declined –63.50%.

image

The good news for Sears executives is that while they engage in practices that appear to be questionable, they have sufficiently absolved themselves of the inevitable lawsuits that will likely follow their eventual bankruptcy.

So what do we expect from SHLD management in the short-term?  We believe that the stock will experience another short squeeze with news that is supposed to reflect that the company has “turned the corner.”  The temporary boost will rout the short-sellers and buy some time for management.  However, as we said in our February 10, 2017 posting, “…anyone who continues to hold their position in Sears will not be rewarded for the value that has been lost since Lampert came on board.”

Transaction Alert

On January 23, 2018, we executed the following transaction(s): Continue reading

Payout Ratio Studies: Procter & Gamble

It has been our observation that a company with a history of dividend increases over a full economic cycle (ideally more) will exhibit a characteristic of being especially undervalued when the stock has a high dividend payout ratio.  In this posting, we’ll show how a well established company like Procter & Gamble (PG) can generate a high dividend payout ratio and exceptional total returns compared to low dividend payout ratios and mediocre investment returns.

Mercury General: Targets and Perspective

On August 14, 2012, when Mercury General (MCY) was trading at a price of $37.30, we said the following:

According to Morningstar.com, MCY is considered a “buy” at $31 and at fair value at $45.  Our own model suggests that MCY is significantly undervalued at $39 and a “buy” at $45. Investment Quality Trends (www.iqtrends.com) indicates that when MCY is at a yield of 4.5% or higher, the stock should be considered for purchase.  Currently, MCY has a dividend yield of approximately 6.60%.  Keep in mind that we do not buy stocks for their dividend yield.  Instead, we use the company’s consistently increasing dividend as the only proof that the company management can:

  • increase earnings over time
  • reward current shareholders

Since that time, we’ve seen Mercury General increase from $37.30 to as high as $64.52.  Along with the increase in price, we’ve been forced to revise our perspective on the stock.  Below, we will outline the revisions to our perspective and provide target prices we think MCY should be considered for acquisition.

Review: Western Digital SRL

On November 25, 2015, we posted the following SRL for Western Digital (WDC):

image

Implied in the posting is that WDC would decline, at minimum, to the $49.70 level with the potential of going all the way to the $37.45 level.  Falling below the extreme downside target ($37.45) is where we always recommended consideration of the fundamentals of a stock for a potential purchase. Below is the updated price action for WDC.

image

Much of the price action of WDC has conformed to the SRL which, from our experience, has been amazing in calling downside targets.  The current price action suggests considerable weakness in the stock if WDC cannot maintain the ascending $61.16 level.

Goldman Plays with Numbers

On MarketWatch.com we saw the following article:

image

In the article, it quotes Goldman Sachs analysts as saying, “We also believe that cryptocurrencies have moved beyond bubble levels in financial markets, and even beyond the levels seen during the Dutch ‘tulipmania’ between 1634 and early 1637.”

In addition to concerns about bitcoin, the article highlights cool charts that compare Ether to previous bubbles, as seen below.

image

We thought, if Goldman Sachs can play with numbers then why can’t we?  So we decided to pit the price rise in Bitcoin from April 23, 2011 to April 9, 2013 with the price rise in Ethereum from January 11, 2017 to January 24, 2018.  We just wanted to see the two periods back to back.

image

Playing with the numbers is fun because we picked a period that Goldman has chosen to overlook to compare Ethereum to.  It turns out, if you don’t know the history of Bitcoin and other relevant bubbles, then you’ll miss the last time they probably got it wrong.  The importance of this chart is that perspective matters.

We know that the bubble will bust at some point, the purpose of this piece is to demonstrate that what isn’t shown can be as important as what is shown.