Category Archives: XAU

Gold Stock Indicator

Continue reading

Gold Stocks Near New Low

This is the list of gold related equities that we track within 10% of the one year low.  We strongly recommend that you do your own research on these companies and assume that the downside risk is half of the current price, at minimum.

Continue reading

Gold Stock Indicator

Continue reading

Upside Targets for Individual Gold Stocks

We’ve come to the time when we need to determine the upside targets for gold stocks.  There are a few assumption that we’re making in this assessment.  First, we believe that our Gold Stock Indicator is right about the direction of gold stocks, in general.  Second, we’re assuming that from the current levels there is more downside risk.  Third, we have excluded fundamental analysis (government printing, future earnings capacity, gold as money, etc.) from our assessment of the upside potential for individual gold stocks.

Continue reading

Gold Stock Indicator

Continue reading

Gold Stock Indicator

Continue reading

Gold Stock Indicator: February Performance

Continue reading

Gold Stock Indicator

Continue reading

Our Strategy on Gold Stocks

Continue reading

Gold Stock Indicator

We rely heavily on our Gold Stock Indicator for signs of when to buy gold stocks.  The reason for this is because we found the alternatives, the Gold/XAU and XAU/Gold ratios, to be highly deficient.  These two ratios were thought to be the bedrock of indications on when to buy and sell gold stocks.  According to well known analyst John Hussman, the Gold/XAU ratio has the following indications:

Continue reading

Gold Stock Indicator: The Big Picture

Article Summary

  • Start accumulating gold stocks now
  • select gold stocks from those in the XAU Index
  • at minimum, investors must allow for 25% downside risk before reinvesting more funds

Our Take

On November 2, 2011, we posted an article which highlighted the fact that gold stocks routinely underperform the price of gold (found here). Also in that article, we introduced our Gold Stock Indicator to show that the timing of when to buy gold stocks was more important than the fact that prices and valuations appear to be low.

To demonstrate the significance of our indicator, we’d like to contrast it to the widely used Gold/XAU ratio. According to noted market commentator and fund manager John Hussman:

“…since 1974, the Gold/XAU ratio has been greater than 5.0 about 15% of the time. When the ratio has been this high, the XAU has followed with annualized gains of 89.6%, on average.” (Hussman, John. “Gold/XAU Ratio Signals Buy for Gold Stocks”. Seeking Alpha. March 13, 2007.)

Below is a chart of the Gold/XAU ratio since December 12, 1983:

image

Unfortunately, as gold has transitioned to a secular bull market cycle, the Gold/XAU ratio since 1999 has not provided a consistent signal of when to buy and sell gold stocks. In fact, on July 15, 2008, the Gold/XAU ratio indicated that gold stocks should be bought even as the XAU Index was about to fall an additional –66%.

Also popular among gold investors is the inverse chart of the same ratio known as the XAU/Gold ratio or gold stock/gold ratio. Many variations of these ratios are carelessly used by market commentators with the hope to prove that gold stocks should be acquired. So far, the Gold/XAU ratio has incorrectly indicated that gold stocks are a “buy” for the past 998 trading days in a row. Few who make reference to these ratios are willing to show the full history of these gold and gold stock ratios. In all cases, the ratio is the same and since July 15, 2008 has failed to steer gold stock investors away from significant loses in gold stocks.

In stark contrast, our Gold Stock Indicator had been able to consistently identify long-term opportunities of when to buy and sell gold stocks. Below is the most updated version of our Gold Stock Indicator:

image

At the current level, our indicator suggests that gold stocks should be accumulated. The last time that gold stocks were at the exact same level, gold and gold stocks posted the following returns:

Year(s) Gold XAU
1986-1987 22.35% 84.11%
1987-1989 -4.81% 52.87%
1992-1993 11.03% 66.44%
1997-2006 83.00% 113.54%
2008-2010 64.14% 99.95%
Average gain/loss 35.14% 83.38%

While we recommend accumulating gold stocks at this time, it is important to understand and accept the possible downside risks. Below is the percentage loss that was experienced after each indication to buy gold stocks and before any gains were realized:

1986 -16.57%
1992 -5.92%
1997 -34.54%
2008 -40.81%
Average Decline -24.46%

The 1987-1989 period was excluded from our downside risk data simply because it did not have any loss before moving to the sell indication. If we included the decline after the 1987 buy signal the average loss would have been –19.57% for all five buy signals since 1983. However, we’d like to opt for the more conservative figure of –24.46% to keep our expectation more realistic.

Those who wish to participate in the eventual run up in gold stocks should consider those that are a part of the XAU index. The members of the XAU index are ranked below based on the percentage from the 52-week low:

Symbol Name price P/E EPS Yield Price/Book % from Low % of Index
NEM Newmont Mining Corp. $45.06 97.31 0.46 3.1 1.72 5.12% 10.90%
BVN Buenaventura SA $36.89 11.17 3.31 2.1 2.88 5.45% 4.60%
ABX Barrick Gold Corporation $33.17 8.11 4.1 2.5 1.34 7.26% 16.00%
GFI Gold Fields Ltd. $13.09 9.72 1.34 4.6 1.66 11.70% 4.70%
AU AngloGold Ashanti Ltd. $34.55 894.90 0.04 1.2 240.61 12.61% 6.60%
PAAS Pan American Silver Corp. $15.18 5.19 2.93 1 0.82 12.68% 0.70%
GG Goldcorp Inc. $36.70 22.94 1.6 1.5 1.36 16.30% 14.50%
HMY Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd. $10.07 14.30 0.71 1 1.08 17.00% 2.20%
FCX Freeport-McMoRan $34.01 10.19 3.33 3.7 1.95 17.63% 15.70%
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation $8.59 0.00 -1.96 1.9 0.78 20.60% 3.40%
AUY Yamana Gold, Inc. $15.17 19.86 0.76 1.4 1.49 23.00% 5.60%
SLW Silver Wheaton Corp. $28.27 17.48 1.62 1.3 3.59 23.45% 4.80%
GOLD Randgold Resources Ltd. $91.18 19.84 4.6 0.4 3.68 25.11% 4.10%
SSRI Silver Standard Resources Inc. $13.07 15.24 0.86 0 1.06 30.02% 0.50%
RGLD Royal Gold, Inc. $76.63 46.43 1.65 0.8 2.57 34.40% 2.20%
AEM Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd. $44.16 0.00 -3.3 1.9 2.31 40.80% 3.60%

In theory, the stocks that have the largest weighting in the index contribute the most movement either up or down. However, this may not result in the largest percentage gains that are possible as compared to other stocks in the XAU index. We prefer those stocks that are nearest the low, so we’d opt for NEM, ABX and GG ahead of FCX, BVN and GFI.

Gold stocks that are a part of the XAU index have the benefit of institutional support and the risk of individual implosions. Also, as we’ve explained in our article titled “Why Gold Stocks Will Decline More Than the Markets,” gold stocks are tied strongly to the performance of the general stock market. This was graphically demonstrated in 2008 when gold stocks declined –68% in the period from March 14th to October 27th. Many claim that 2008 was an aberration, our analysis of gold stocks from the 1924 to the present clearly indicates that 2008 was not a fluke. Keep in mind that a –68% decline in the stock index means that individual stocks within the index likely fell much lower, on a percentage basis.

Investors should take their time in acquiring gold stocks as there is some downside risk. However, if 10%-15% of the portfolio is set aside for such investing, there are good opportunities if the purchases are done in stages.

Market Outlook: Mixed Signals

On February 7, 2012, we wrote an article on the topic of gold titled “Gold Stock Indicator Points Down” (found here).  In that article, the very last sentence said the following:

“based on the current trajectory, we have May/June 2012 as our tentative reversal period.”

Well, the month of May has passed and we’ve seen an amazing plunge in gold stocks since the posting of our February 7th article, as reflected in the chart below:

image

Since February 7, 2012, the XAU gold stock index declined -28.95% to the May 15th low.  As we had anticipated, the “May/June” bottom was reached, for now. Ordinarily, this would be the time to buy gold stocks, especially those that pay a dividend.  However, in our May 27th transaction review of NUGT (found here), we said that, based on our Gold Stock Indicator, there would be a second opportunity to buy gold stocks at a considerable value.

The recovery in the XAU index has been even more spectacular than the plunge.  Historically, such rapid increases in a stock or index would require a decline of at least -50% of the most recent rise, even if the trend is still higher.  Therefore, based on the most recent price of 168.71 in the XAU index, there should be a decline to the 154.56 level or half of whichever the most recent peak might be.  We’d consider buying dividend paying gold stocks at half of the highest point achieved or lower.  (Please, if you have any questions about this paragraph we’d be more than glad to explain further if we were not clear in any way.)

For now, the direction for gold stocks is up based on our Gold Stock Indicator, until proven otherwise.  However, at the same time the Gold Stock Indicator is pointing up, we have a Dow Theory bear market indication as outlined in our May 19th article (found here) suggesting that stocks in general are supposed to decline.  Our vast amount of research on the topic suggests that if the general stock market were to have a decline of 10%-15% or more, then gold stocks would decline by a greater percentage.  As an example, in 2008, when the general stock market declined –37% as reflected in the S&P 500 (full year decline), the XAU gold stock index declined -66% within the period from March 2008 to October 2008.

We don’t know which indication will take precedence.  Therefore, we are opting for the most conservative stance possible.  We’re waiting for the stock market to confirm the Dow Theory bear market indication or quickly come up with a bull market indication.  We’re holding out for the possibility that gold stocks will provide the second opportunity to buy as has been indicated in our May 27th transaction review.

Questions or thoughts?  Let us know, we’ll do our best to provided a thoughtful response.

Gold Stock Indicator Points Down

On November2, 2011, we posted an article titled “A Strategy is Needed for Lagging Gold Stocks.”  In that article we made reference to a Gold Stock Indicator that we’ve been using to determine the best times to buy and sell gold stocks.   Below is the same Gold Stock Indicator covering the period from November18, 2010 to February 7, 2012. 
In this example of the Gold Stock Indicator, we’ve provided the percentage change when the Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear (DUST) [in red]and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull (NUGT) [in green] are bought and then sold when the Gold Stock Indicator has reached the opposite trend line.  In this example, the opposite of the NUGT trendline is the red trendline and vice versa. We’ve excluded the respective peaks and troughs in consideration of percentage change.  We only used the periods when the indicator first crossed the opposite trend line.
DUST and NUGT are ETFs that carry the highest risk of loss because they are intended to move at 3 times (3x) the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index.  Therefore, DUST and NUGT are speculations and not investments.  Additionally,as the trend for the Gold Stock Indicator has been in a long declining phase,we expect that this pattern should reverse substantially at some point.  However, based on the current trajectory, we have May/June 2012 as our tentative reversal period.

A Strategy is Needed for Lagging Gold Stocks

For gold stock investors, a timing strategy is the most effective way to match or beat the coming metal price increase. Among our caveats, we’re excluding junior and exploration mining companies which will either go out of business, experience share price booms or get acquired by peers or the majors. What follows is our examination of whether the lagging gold stocks, the inability of gold stocks to perform equal to or greater than the price of physical metal, is unique to our time or a fundamental hallmark of gold bull markets.

There is considerable discussion about the divergence between the price of gold and gold stocks. In the divergence, the price of gold has tended to rise to new highs while gold stocks (majors) either trade in a range, decline or increase at a tepid rate compared to the physical metal.

Some argue that due to the divergence, gold stocks represent the best investment opportunity because inevitably, the stocks will catch up with the metal. Others say that, the lack of confirmation of gold stocks to exceed prior highs is an indication that the metal is overvalued or needs to decline.

Unfortunately, although both points seem well reasoned (along with many other explanations), evidence from the previous gold bull market suggests that gold mining majors typically underperform the metal. The primary source that we’re drawing from is Richard Russell’s Dow Theory Letters from 1970 to 1979 with data points confirmed in Barron’s and Kitco.com for the respective dates.

On numerous occasions, Richard Russell would express his concern for the divergence between the price of gold and gold stocks. Below are Russell’s observations of the failure of gold stocks to follow the price of gold higher:

Meanwhile, despite the recent highs in the price of gold bullion, the gold stocks are not keeping up with the price of the yellow metal. I have received many calls from subscribers asking why.” (Richard Russell, Dow Theory Letters, May 17, 1972, Letter 529, page 6.)

The general feeling seems to be that the gold stocks have been discounting [falling in advance of] a decline in bullion.” (Richard Russell, Dow Theory Letters, September 27, 1974, Letter 610, page 6.)

“‘What’s happening to the shares’ I am asked. ‘Why don’t they move with gold?’” (Richard Russell, Dow Theory Letters, January 2, 1975, Letter 618, page 5.

At the bottom of the chart is the Barron’s Gold Average (stocks). This may move, too, but this Average has a long way to go to hit its 1974 high while gold could better the old 200 high easily. That should tell us something. And it’s the reason I’ve been saying all along-gold, not gold stocks.” (Richard Russell, Dow Theory Letters, November 9, 1977, Letter 713, page 5.)

Since Barron’s Average is very heavily weighted in favor of ASA, we are looking to a large extent at the relative performance of the S. African gold shares against bullion. The picture is clear enough. The market, since mid-1974. has preferred bullion to the gold shares. And who am I to argue with the market? That’s the reason I’ve been recommending gold, not the shares.” (Richard Russell, Dow Theory Letters, February 17, 1978, Letter 722, page 6.)

Since late-January the gold stocks have been reactionary whereas gold has been hitting new 1977-78 highs. In March both stocks and the metal declined, and as you can see the stocks broke below their February lows. Yet the metal has not confirmed on the downside, holding well above its February low. I take this non-confirmation as a bullish indication. I think it is telling us that the metal will not respond to gold share weakness, and it is telling us that the metal ‘wants’ to go to new highs. Whether the stocks will follow is another story.” (Richard Russell, Dow Theory Letters, April 5, 1978, Letter 726, page 6.)

My chart of gold and the gold averages (see page 6) is now showing a dramatic divergence. The gold stock average has broke” below its November low, but the bullion price has held well above that point.” (Richard Russell, Dow Theory Letters, May 5, 1978, Letter 729, page 5.)

This non-confirmation between gold and the gold stock average which I discussed in the last Letter is still in force. Many feared that the reactionary tendencies [decline] in the gold shares were calling for a correction in gold. For this reason many advisors have been telling their clients to sell their gold or even short gold. The consequences have been unhappy for the sellers, disastrous for the shorts.” (Richard Russell, Dow Theory Letters, November 1, 1978, Letter 742, page 5.)

My chart of gold bullion (daily) and the Gold Stock Average (GSA) documents the extraordinary divergence which continues to build between gold and GSA. Why did gold and GSA rally in tandem up to the October highs and why are the gold shares so

reluctant now?” (Richard Russell, Dow Theory Letters, February 28, 1979, Letter 751, page 7.

My chart of daily gold and the gold stock average (GSA) continues to picture divergence, with Campbell Red Lake and ASA stubbornly refusing to move back to their October highs.” (Richard Russell, Dow Theory Letters, July 5, 1979, Letter 760, page 6.)

I obviously cannot tell at this time whether gold is going to surge above 307 to a new high- or whether gold is in the process of topping out. The gold stocks have been weak, and my gold stock average has broken below the three minor bottoms. But so far, even weakness in the gold shares has not rubbed off on the metal.” (Richard Russell, Dow Theory Letters, August 15, 1979, Letter 763, page 6.)

To add to the consternation of gold stock investors, the period after the peak in the price of gold in January 1980 showed gold stocks held up better than the metal. This threw off “seasoned” gold investors because it gave the false impression that gold’s collapse would recover somehow. The following is Russell’s comments on this matter after the peak:

The gold stocks did not act during the 1980 decline the way they did during the 1974 debacle. This time they tended to hold very well. Now they are looking bullish (despite the many troubles, the increasing troubles in So. Africa). The shares, in other words, show good relative strength against the metal. This is a good sign for gold in general.” (Richard Russell, Dow Theory Letters, June 4, 1980, Letter 784, page 5.)

Although gold stocks are a leveraged play on the price of gold, there are critical points in time when gold stocks should be bought and then sold in order to take advantage of the leveraged characteristics. Those who buy and hold gold stocks for the “long term” will be disappointed with the performance as compared to the price of gold. Therefore, it is necessary to have a timing indicator that will highlight the best times to invest in gold stocks.

Below we have constructed a gold stock indicator based on the Philadelphia Gold and Silver Stock Index (XAU) which reveals the best times to accumulate and dispose of gold stocks. The points above the red line indicates the time to sell gold stocks and the points below the green line indicate when to buy gold stocks. We’ve taken the liberty of considering a sell indication whenever the indicator first reaches the red zone on a move to the upside and a buy/accumulate when the indicator first falls to the green line on a move to the downside.

On average, sell indications occurred after a +52% increase in the XAU index. This does not account for the individual performance of gold stocks that are constituents of the index. The consistency of our Gold Stock Indicator reflected the best times to acquire the major gold stocks as well as the most ideal times to sell the gold stocks.

On the chart of the Philadelphia Gold and Silver Stock Index (XAU) above, we have shown where the indicated “buy/accumulate” recommendations would have taken place in yellow. The green circles show what would have happened if the purchase occurred at the worst possible time in the given period and is measured to the respective peaks in the XAU index soon after. As mentioned in many prior articles, we always account for at least -50% downside risk with any investment position that we take. This appears to be a minimum requirement when applying our indicator to the purchase of constituents of the Philadelphia Gold and Silver Stock Index (XAU).

For an investor who wishes to accumulate gold shares from within the XAU index, they would benefit from well timed purchases rather than getting whip-sawed by a wildly gyrating index that will inevitably underperform the price of gold in the “long-term.” We have identified the top five stocks that are likely to outperform the XAU index when the next buy signal is given. The five companies are AngloGold (AU), Yamana Gold (AUY), Gold Fields (GFI), Randgold (GOLD) and Royal Gold (RGLD).

The obvious alternative to buying gold stocks is with the physical asset. The paper version of gold is the SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Although not truly tested through a full gold bull and bear cycle, GLD remains the among the most popular ways to “invest” in the physical asset. Our preference is for the non-paperized version of gold in the form of one-ounce coins.

As has been demonstrated in the gold bull market from 1970 to 1980, gold stocks (the majors) will generally underperform the price of gold. Those who are bound and determined to buy gold stocks can pursue the juniors and explorers which provide a wide range of outcomes that are independent of the price of gold (but helped by the rising value of gold) based on new discoveries, getting acquired or going bust. The alternative, buying the majors, should be done with a well constructed strategy that does not rely on hold-and-hope.

Netflix and Speed Resistance Lines

In a February 9, 1970 Barron’s article titled “600 on the Dow?” William X. Scheinman provides an interesting chart of the Dow Industrials (DJI) that outlines what he believes to be the target level that the DJI would fall to before rebounding. This analysis included macro economic analysis that supported the reasons why the Dow was expected to go to 600.

What is most compelling in Scheinman’s analysis is the accuracy of the target level that the DJI was expected to reach. An element that leaves some unanswered questions is that Scheinman had predicted that the DJI would reach 600 within the same year that the article was written. Of course, The DJI didn’t reach 600 until 1974. This has to do with Scheinman’s cycle analysis which is separate and distinct from the topic which we will examine. Being aware of this inconsistency and leaving it aside for the time being, we’ve attempted to understand the rational and methodology of how Scheinman was able to arrive at 600 on the DJI when it was trading at 755.68.

Scheinman indicates that he obtained his method for accurately predicting the level of the DJI from Edson Gould. According to Scheinman, Gould used what is known as the 1/3 speed resistance line measurement to gauge price change and elapsed time which was purported to be two key determinants of crowd psychology in the market. Scheinman goes on to say:

“Resistance lines decline or ascend at one-third or two-thirds the rates of actual declines and advances between significant bottoms and tops. Resistance to advance or decline is frequently encountered at such trendlines; however, if the resistance line is decisively penetrated, the price-action often tends to accelerate in the direction of the penetration.”
In an example provided by Scheinman below, he plots the bull market of the DJI from 1949 to 1970. In that chart, we can see that the dashed line, the one-third speed resistance line, intersects with the 600 level on the DJI.

As far as we can tell, the 1/3 speed resistance line is calculated by dividing the peak of the market move by 3.  To be as conservative as possible, we’ve added the 1/3 speed resistance figure to the low of the first major decline in the bull run.  In this case, the first major low in the bull market from 1949 to 1966 was at the 1953 low of DJI 254.  The peak is indicated to be 1001 (1001/3=333.66).  Then we add 333.66 to 254 arriving at a figure of 587.66.  In order to account for the extremes, we assume that 1/3 the peak is the point at which the market finally settles.  In this case, 1/3 of the peak value is 333.66.  We feel that the conservative and extreme values help to establish a range which a market or stock that has had a near parabolic rise will finally settle at or near. 

According to our calculations for the market run from 1949 to 1966, 587.66 and 333.66 were the conservative and extreme downside targets for the market, respectively.  However, in the article, Scheinman says that the potential worst-case scenario level would be 597.61.  For the most part, Scheinman’s estimate was fairly accurate in terms of where the reversal in the market occurred.  The bottom in the stock market took place on December 9, 1974 at the 579.94 level.

In the chart of the Dow from 1945 to 1976 below, it should be noted that a large amount of “overshooting” of the 1/3 speed resistance line occurred when the low did take place in 1974 instead of 1970 as predicted by Scheinman.  In the case of the Dow, the index overshot the 1/3 speed resistance line in 1974 by 15%.  However, the price was well within the established, albeit wide, range of 587.66 to 333.66.

We decided to see how consistent the 1/3 speed resistance line would be if applied to three different situations.  First, we’ll review the bull market in the Dow Industrials (DJI) from 1982 to 2007. Next, we’ll run this model using the Philadelphia Gold and Silver Index (XAU) from the bear market bottom of 2001 to the present.  Finally, we’re going to see how this model works against Netflix (NFLX), a member of the Nasdaq 100, in a real-time example.

In the case of the bull market run from 1982 to 2007, we divided the peak of the market at 14,164 by 3 and arrived at 4721.33.  We then added 4721.33 to the first major low in the market after the beginning of the bull market which was in 1987 at 1738.74.  The sum of the two figures is 6460.07 for the conservative and 4721.33 for the extreme scenarios. 

When we review the actual bottom in the DJI in 2009 of 6547.05 we can see that the difference between the most conservative estimate and the 2009 low was off by 86.98 points.  There is no instance of the DJI overshooting the 1/3 speed resistance line.  Although coming within 1.5% of an estimated target seems exceptional, the real challenge becomes, would an investor commit money to an investment before the price level actually hits a projected target?  Once invested, could an investor stomach a further decline of 27% or more? [(6460.07-4721.33)/6460.07=26.92%]

In the case of the bull market run in the XAU Index, we divided the peak of the index at 206.37 in 2008 by 3 and arrived at 68.79.  We then added 68.79 to the first major low in the index after the beginning of the bull run, which was at 49.83 on November 19, 2001.  The sum of the two figures is 118.62.  When we contrast the difference between the two numbers, 118.62 and the actual low of 65.72, we see that conservative estimate was accomplished, however a further decline of 45% to below the extreme level was established instead.  Reasonably near the extreme end of the range, but who is willing to hold on after a 45% drop?
Finally, in reviewing the chart pattern of Netflix (NFLX), we have the peak of NFLX at $298.73.  The conservative estimate for the stock is that it would fall to $148 which has already taken place.  The extreme downside target would be $99.58.  Because of the nature of the rise, we believe that Netflix (NFLX) is slated to fall at least to the $99.58 level. 
If for any reason investors become interested in buying Netflix (NFLX), the ideal time to do it appears to be at a price at or below $99.58.  However, the difficulty may be that the sentiment that pushed the stock price to $298.73 would likely be just the opposite to push the price down.  Only time will tell whether Netflix is going to conform to technical patterns created by Edson Gould.
Please consider donating to the New Low Observer. Thank you.