Category Archives: MTSN

Research Request: Applied Materials (AMAT)

A research request is a response to our reader's question regarding Applied Materials: "Do you like AMAT? They just raised their dividend and seem close to an average low." Our team wrote a brief response with the article titled "Applied Material and the Chip Sector Should Be on Your Radar" but we'd like to take that analysis a little bit further.
This isn't the first time we've mentioned a company within the chip sector. Our original Speculative Observation on Mattson (MTSN) yielded more than 50% in less than 6 months. Since that write up, MTSN returned 65% while AMAT went nowhere and returned less than 1%.
In pursuit of "seeking fair profits" and being a rather conservative bunch, we had to issue a Sell Recommendation on MTSN at $3.32 on January 6, 2010. Part of our strategy is to constantly search for alternative investment opportunity with a lower risk profile and higher reward potential. With that in mind, you can see that MTSN has outperformed AMAT and the overall market by a wide margin, thus it is fair to say that risk/reward profile is now more favorable for AMAT than MTSN. So let's take a deeper look at AMAT.
Applied Materials (AMAT) is the largest supplier of semiconductor, flat panel display (LCD), and solar equipment according to VLSI Research. The company leveraged their knowledge in LCD market into the solar market in late 2008. There are many growth drivers for this company and the sector. On the chip side, you have China continuing to consume more and more electronics pushing demand for greater chips. LCD driver is coming from conversion from CRT TV to LCD. Solar may get a boost from Obama push for "greener" economy. Though sound bullish in arguments, these factors may already be in the price so we must look at the  fundamental.
As of this writing, AMAT is trading roughly around $13.25. This is up considerably (100%+) from AMAT's December 2008 low of $6.24. The company began distributing cash dividends back in 2005 for the amount of $0.09. The current 2010 dividend payout is $0.28 which amounts to a 25% annual increase in dividend. It is expected the that growth rate of the dividend can't be sustain forever but we've taken this is as a positive sign of management's commitment to the shareholders. We at New Low Observer thinks true profits are obtained when a company shows cash rather than paper profits. The current yield of AMAT sits a little above 2% and is quite high on a historical basis. Average yield should be at 1.5%. Take that average yield and you arrive at a share price of $17.35. My proprietary model, which takes into consideration cash flow, earnings, book value, and yield, shows the following price targets:
  • Dirt cheap - $6.75 (we saw AMAT at $6.24 and rocketed up)
  • Buy - $13.26 (we are in that range)
  • Fair - $17.35
  • Over Value - $26.18
*my model changes over time so don't take these prices as static.
For technical analysis on AMAT, please refer back to the article "Applied Material and the Chip Sector Should Be on Your Radar".
So what would we do?
First, we look for other alternatives and stick to our rule of buying low (within 20% of the 52 week low). Because AMAT is 28% above the low, we will not chase it. Alternative investments may be in names like Qualcomm (QCOM) which is 15% above the low. If and when the price retraces on the downside, we'll re-evaluate the situation and may be compelled to buy more.
For anyone who believes that this is an opportunity that can't be missed, I recommend allocating 15% of your portfolio into this name. On top of that, do a two part purchase. First buy 7.5% now and if the shares fall another 20% buy the remaining 7.5% later. This way, the cost basis of the stock would require only a 10% rise to break even.  Again, it is not likely that we'll buy AMAT since the alternatives provide exceptional opportunity with less downside risk.
For Research Request of companies on our most recent Watch Lists (only Dividend Achiever or Nasdaq 100), email our team here.  We'll post only one research request each week.

Chipmaker Intersil Pays Cash for Semi maker Techwell

No sooner than we published our Nasdaq 100 Watch List on Saturday March 20th outlining a preliminary case for chip manufactures than integrated circuit manufacturer Intersil Corporation (ISIL) announces today that it will pay cash for semiconductor manufacturer Techwell (TWLL).  Although it was luck that our suggestion to examine the chip sector came just before the acquisition of Techwell (TWLL), the fact that the purchase was done with cash is a testament to the fact that the chip manufacturers have abundant cash or are under priced and undervalued.  Techwell (TWLL) rose 47.75% during regular trading hours as Intersil (ISIL) will pay a premium of 48.71%. 
For all intents and purposes, the chip sector lite up like a Christmas tree on the announcement of the acquisition of Techwell (TWLL) today.  Our previous Speculative Recommendation of Mattson Technology (MTSN), another wafer equipment manufacturer, is now about to breach the old high of $4.22 if the industry continues to heat up with activity.
We have said it many times before and will continue to iterate the point that when a whole sector or industry starts to appear at or near a new low then it typically indicates that the companies within that industry are undervalued.  It only takes a cursory look to verify if this assumption is correct.  Once it can be verified that companies in a specific industry are undervalued, you can rest assured that the mergers and acquisitions will begin. The fact that cash is being used to buy up companies is the final nail in the coffin on the theory of an undervalued sector.
Since we started the New Low Observer, we have been able to identify the water sector, the biotech/pharma sector and the medical device sector as undervalued before acquisitions or substantial price gains occurred.  It should be noted that we don't have any special skills,  just the willingness to carefully observe and sometimes buy companies that have fallen to a new low.  Get the research going for the companies that are part of the chip sector, and never chase a stock that has a rising price.
-Touc
Email our team here.

Gaining More by Limiting Our Gains

One of the biggest challenges to buying and holding a stock for the long term is the wait through thick and thin for the expectations of a particular stock to materialize. In a process of elimination, the New Low Observer team has narrowed down the steps to determining quality stocks by relegating it to those that have increased their dividend every year for at least 10 years in a row. Furthermore, we only seek out those high quality dividend paying stocks, as well as Nasdaq 100 index constituents, when the companies are within 20% of the 1-year low. Having these requirements allows us to select quality companies at (potentially) ideal times to invest.
However, once we have decided on the company that we're interested in investing and we've committed money to, we are still at the whims of "Mr. Market." Although it might seem surprising to some, we are incredibly risk averse and always try to avoid losses whenever we can. We are so risk averse that we have a general rule that if the investment in a particular stock exceeds the gains of the market over the last 100, 50, 25, or 10 years on an annual basis (after expenses) then we tend to sell that stock to seek alternative investment opportunities. If nothing else, we secure the exceptional gains and bide our time until the next "undervalued" opportunity arrives.While the buy-and-hold crowd cries foul at the thought that we're speculating rather than investing when buying and selling high quality stocks at arguably undervalued prices, we have noticed a pattern that keeps emerging from our strategy that sets apart our approach from merely speculating. One of the best recent examples of the value in our investment philosophy is the case of Meridian Biosciences (VIVO).
On March 17, 2010, as the Dow Industrials and Dow Transportation Average were confirming the Dow Theory trend to the upside, Meridian Biosciences (VIVO) was dropping like a rock on news that the future earnings would have to be revised lower. In one fell swoop, Meridian Biosciences (VIVO) erased 9 months of hard earned gains in the stock price. I say 9 months because after our recommendation to sell VIVO, the stock increased in value an additional 27% in 3 months at the peak in September 2009.
At the time of our sell recommendation, Meridian Biosciences had risen 11.75% from our Research Recommendation on March 26, 2009. We were content in our gains and smug at being so smart at selling while the going was good. However, we watched, in almost horror, as the stock continued to climb higher going from our sell point of $20.35 all the way up to $26. We began to wonder if selling a company that we were convinced was of the highest quality was the best choice. After all, Meridian Biosciences (VIVO) is one of the only Dividend Achievers to match the gains of Google (GOOG) on a percentage basis from the date of Google's (GOOG) IPO to the peak in late 2007/early 2008.
With a tinge of regret we moved on hoping that our next investment would make up for our blunder of selling VIVO at such a cheap price. In the nine months since our sell recommendation of Meridian Biosciences (VIVO) we've made eight Investment Observations that were followed by Sell Recommendations. Below are the stocks we mentioned and the percentage gains that were secured since our sell recommendation of VIVO on June 12, 2009:
  • Cardinal Health (CAH) +23%
  • Abbott Labs (ABT) +16.80%
  • SuperValu (SVU) +11.87%
  • Nor'wst Nat (NWN) +10.53%
  • AquaAmer. (WTR) +10%
  • Cephalon (CEPH) +13.41%
  • Mattson (MTSN) +24%
  • Monsanto (MON) +22%
With the reduction of earnings estimates and the subsequent collapse of Meridian Biosciences (VIVO), the stock has fallen below the level of the original sell recommendation that was given on June 12, 2009. In addition, we've highlighted eight companies that have provided double digit returns in a complete buy and sell cycle all within a nine month period. The chart below illustrates the recommendation dates in green and the sell dates in red with the post-collapse price in yellow.
Today the New Low Observer team breathes a sigh of relief, not in the lose that has afflicted current Meridian Biosciences shareholders but based on the fact that we stayed the course with our investment philosophy which provided gains that, to this point, have gone beyond our expectations by actually limiting how much we are willing to accept on the upside.The lesson that should be learned about Meridian Biosciences is that although the price is nearly the same as a year ago doesn't mean that there was no movement or activity. In fact, the stock went up as much as 44% in 5 months. This is the hard lesson that most buy-and-hold investors should have learned about where the major indexes have gone over the last 10 years. Within all the drama that occured since 2000, many opportunies presented themselves but may have never been realized if holding for the long-term was the only investment strategy. For most investors, the real challenge becomes whether or not to sell a stock after exceptional gains.
Our Current Take on Meridian Biosciences
In our sell recommendation of Meridian Biosciences at the $20.35 level, we said that VIVO would easily go to the $23.33. Since the peak in the price at $26.20 in September 2009 and the recent decline to $19.60, Dow Theory indicates that for this stock, the upside move should take the price at least to the $23 level before going back to the old high of $26.20 or back down to the $19 range. Our expectation that a reaction of 11% to 13% upside move would not be unusual.For those who are interested in justifications of Meridian Biosciences (VIVO) as an investment candidate (since the negative news is already out), there are several compelling factors to watch for.
First and foremost is the recent confirmation of the bullish move of the stock market according to Dow’s Theory. This gives the investor that chance to make mistakes without paying a hefty price. More specific to Meridian Biosciences (VIVO) is the fact that the company is selling 16% below the 8-year average price-to-earnings ratio according to Morningstar.com. VIVO is also selling 3% below the average price-to-cash flow ratio over the last 10 years. Bolstering the case for VIVO is the fact that the company carries little or no debt. We will be watching Meridian Biosciences (VIVO) closely for any indication that the stock will decline from the current level. Our hope, as it always is, is to buy the stock at a much lower price and take reasonable gains in the shortest period of time possible. It is our hope that others can see the value of our approach of taking gains that exceed the historical average annual return and seeking alternative investment opportunities whether it is in cash or another quality stock that is at or near a new low.
  • Don't know the historical average annual gains for 100, 50 or 10 years. Go to Moneychimp.com's CAGR of the Stock Market Calculator. Pick just about any time frame and see what you've been missing (even on an inflation adjusted basis).
  • Want more info about the strategy mentioned above, then go to our article title "When Timing Meets Opportunity" on SeekingAlpha.com. The article was posted in July of 2009 and has more relevancy than ever before.
  • Our article titled "Seeking Fair Profits" outlines Charles H. Dow's philosophy of fair expectations when investing in the stock market. Charles Dow was the co-founder of the Wall Street Journal and the Dow Jones Indexes.
Tell a friend about us. Thank you.

Sell Mattson Technology (MTSN) at the Market

In our previous write up on Mattson Technology (MTSN) on October 22nd, we warned readers that this position was not for the faint of heart. As if to prove our point, MTSN promptly fell from the $2.65 level at the time of the recommendation all the way down to the level of $1.94 on November 4, 2009, a decline of nearly 27% in two weeks.

Now, with the stock trading at $3.32 and with a gain of 24% in 77 days, we think that it is time to relieve ourselves of this highly speculative position. With the understanding that any investment that exceeds a return of 13% within one year is exceptional, we feel that MTSN is getting long in the tooth. Additionally, if viewed from a technical standpoint, MTSN has formed a topping out pattern over the last couple of weeks. -Touc

related article:

Speculation Observations: Mattson Technology (MTSN) at $2.65

Mattson Technology (MTSN) is a supplier of equipment to Semiconductor producers (i.e. Intel). Some of their competitors are Applied Materials (AMAT), Lam Research (LRCX), and Novellus (NVLS). These are 2 billion dollar plus companies versus a 130 million dollar company. Market cap doesn't tell me anything about valuation of the company, so I would ignore that figure for now.
Macro View
When the economy recovers, people feel better and they go out and buy a computer from suppliers like Dell or HP. These computer suppliers then have to ramp up their production and order more computer chips from Intel or Samsung. A demand surge triggered Intel to boost production by expanding their production capacity by purchasing more tools from the likes of Applied Materials or Mattson. This is what generally happens when the economy recovery takes place.
Market Exposure
In 2008, 19% of MTSN revenue came from Canon and 10% came from Samsung (from 2008 Annual Report). Because 90% of MTSN's revenue comes from overseas, this company is truly international company. The largest market they served is memory, which is estimated to be around 70% of their revenue. As you may guessed from going to Fry's or Best Buy, USB memory sticks sell for next to nothing. It's appropriate that this market has seen a fair share of margin contraction (lower profit). This may be the reason why the share price of Mattson and its competitors who are exposed to memory got cut in half.
Valuation
Mattson is currently trading around the $2.50 to $3.00 range. They hold $1.56 cash per share and $2.24 book value. As a result, you have a tech company with NO DEBT, trading at roughly 1.2x book value. That fits Benjamin Graham's formula. Tangible book value (this exclude IP value) is at $3.16 at the end of 2008. Because the company has negative earnings and no dividends, we can only assess valuation based on book value. Using Morningstar valuation tool, you see that over the prior of 10 years, the average trough book value is 1.2.
Some of the things I am concern about are negative earnings for this year and the next, possible burn in cash flow, and market liquidity issues. The company traded as high as $11.76 in 2007 then dropped to $0.30 in 2008. Assuming that you bought at the low and sold at $2.50, you would have gained 700%+ on your money. Such extreme low valuation will not likely return because the credit market have recovered somewhat.
So how do I come up with a fair market value for Mattson? Simple calculation based on Dow Theory suggest a fair market price of $6.03. The calculation is simple, take the peak price of $11.76, plus the absolute low of $0.30, then divide it by 2. That's the fair market value based on the Dow Theory interpretation. The chart below shows a graphical representation of from the peak to the most recent trough.
What You Need to Buy?
If you plan on buying MTSN as a speculation, here are things you need.
  • Strong and Healthy Heart for the up and down market. Don't be surprised if the price falls to $1.50 range.
  • Money you can "throw away". This is a speculation at best, so make sure you can lose it and still be ok.
  • Time. This company will need time to work through the current economic environment. It is safest to assume that the price will not revert to $6 simply because I wrote about it. The market will decide that.
Once again, this observation is on the deep end of the speculation pool. I've selected a stock that I believe has a lot more room on the upside but downside should be apparent based on the $0.30 low. Please do your homework and manage this speculation wisely.
Art

Disclosure: None

Follow-up Article: