Category Archives: CEPH

Nasdaq 100 Watch List: March 16, 2012

Below are the Nasdaq 100 companies that are within 20% of their respective 52-week lows. This Nasdaq 100 Watch List is strictly for the purpose of researching whether or not the companies have viable business models or are about to go out of business. These companies are deemed highly speculative unless otherwise noted.

Symbol Name Price P/E EPS Yield Price/Book payout % from Low
CHRW C.H. Robinson Worldwide 65.67 25.06 2.62 2.00 8.55 50.38% 5.41%
VOD Vodafone Group Plc 26.41 12.28 2.15 3.60 1.02 44.19% 8.64%
EA Electronic Arts Inc. 17.46 0 -0.52 0.00 2.45 0.00% 8.79%
CTRP Ctrip.com Int'l 24.68 22.09 1.12 0.00 3.03 0.00% 12.08%
APOL Apollo Group 42.59 12.08 3.53 0.00 4.07 0.00% 14.86%
FSLR First Solar 29.08 0 -0.46 0.00 0.66 0.00% 14.99%
AMZN Amazon.com 185.05 135.07 1.37 0.00 10.82 0.00% 15.07%
RIMM Research In Motion 14.38 3.39 4.25 0.00 0.68 0.00% 15.50%
VMED Virgin Media Inc. 24.18 65.18 0.37 0.70 7 43.24% 17.84%
SRCL Stericycle, Inc. 86.88 32.3 2.69 0.00 6.11 0.00% 18.93%
DTV DIRECTV 47.47 13.68 3.47 0.00 -10.53 0.00% 19.21%
EXPD Expeditors Int'l of Wash 45.81 25.59 1.79 1.10 4.71 27.93% 19.76%

Watch List Summary

A company that we’re considering buying is C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW), the first company on our list.  The primary consideration that we have is always the downside risk.  We almost ignore the upside targets and projections in order to come up with an idea on the best ways to avoid loss.

The following are two perspectives on the way to view the potential downside risk of buying CHRW. First, according to Dow Theory, CHRW has three significant downside targets that should be considered carefully. The three downside targets are as follows:

  • $60.34 (fair value)
  • $52.91
  • $38.06

The way we approach the Dow Theory downside targets is to buy CHRW if it falls to $60.34 (fair value according to Dow Theory). However, we prepare ourselves for the worst case scenario by expecting that CHRW will decline to the $38.06 level, the low for 2009. With this assumption, we ensure that our initial purchase does not include 100% of what we'd normally invest. Instead, we only invest 30%, 50% or 65% of the amount that we'd ordinarily invest. The remainder of funds is set aside for the possibility that the stock declines. Naturally the greater the amount invested initially, the greater the loss or gain if the stock declines or rises.

The second way to view CHRW's downside risk is strictly from the "technical" patterns based on a chart from the last 5 years.

3-16-2012

From a "technical" standpoint, there are significant support levels at $63.50, $55 and $38. These technical levels are not very different from Dow Theory even though the technical levels based on the chart above are strictly based on the visual cues. We specifically chose the last 5 years because Charles H. Dow has said that best way to gauge a company's future prospects is usually through careful consideration of the period when earnings, book value, price and other fundamental attributes are at their worst. For us, the inclusion of 2007 to 2009 is the best reflection of the worst that has been experienced recently.  With either approach to reviewing the downside risk of a stock, the purpose is ensure that you do not get caught off guard at the prospect of a major price decline.

Watch List Performance Review

In our ongoing review of the Nasdaq 100 Watch List, we have taken the topic 5 stocks from our March 6, 2011 Nasdaq 100 Watch List.   The top 5 companies from the watch list are provided below with the closing price from March 7, 2011 to March 6, 2012.

Symbol Company 2011 2012 % Change
CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. $18.40 $20.03 8.86%
CEPH Cephalon, Inc. $56.17 $81.49 45.08%
AMGN Amgen Inc. $52.32 $67.38 28.78%
TEVA Teva Pharmaceutical Industries  $50.32 $43.08 -14.39%
ATVI Activision Blizzard, Inc $11.27 $12.65 12.24%
Average 16.12%
NDX Nasdaq 100 $2,328.07 $2,712.78 16.52%

3-6-2011 Top 5

Our primary goal at the New Low Observer is to achieve 10% gains within the span of a year inside of our tax deferred accounts.  In the case of AMGN, CEPH and ATVI our goal of 10% within a year was accomplished within the first four months.  CSCO was the last 10% gain that arrived at the end of the 1-year period.  Teva Pharmaceutical (TEVA) severely underperformed for the remainder of the 1-year period.  CEPH did not last very long since it was acquired by none other than Teva Pharmaceutical.  Cephalon was acquired by TEVA within two months of being on our watch list.

Our specific recommendation of Cephalon at $58.99 on February 15, 2011 and the subsequent acquisition explains why we’re drawn to companies at a new low.

Teva Pharmaceuticals (TEVA) Now Slated to Acquire Cephalon (CEPH)

The plot thickens with news that Teva Pharmaceuticals (TEVA) is going to buy Cephalon (CEPH) for $81.50 (article here).  Teva’s offer exceeds Valeant Pharmaceuticals’ (VRX) previous bid of $73. 

We originally recommended Cephalon (CEPH) in August of 2009.  After our August 2009 recommendation of Cephalon, we recommended selling the stock near the high of $71 in March 2010 before the decline to $56.  In February 2011 we recommended readers consider Cephalon at the $58 level.  From there the stock has appreciated 39% in less than 3 months.  The most recent run of Cephalon was followed by a sell recommendation on March 30, 2011 at slightly above $75.  We wagered that despite the prospect of getting a sweetened offer closer to the true value of the company, we didn’t need to argue with a nearly 200% annualized return.

Our recent recommendation of Teva Pharmaceuticals (TEVA) on April 5, 2011 puts a twist on our selling of Cephalon.  It has been reported that Cephalon’s board rejected the Valeant offer and has already accepted the Teva offer. 

Interestingly, both Teva Pharmaceuticals and Valeant Pharmaceuticals got a boost in their share price at the announcement of the acquisition of Cephalon.  Typically, the acquiring company shares would decline at the announcement of a major purchase.  This seems to indicates that the market recognizes the positive impact that Cephalon will have on the ultimate acquirer.

Investors seeking the qualitative elements of Cephalon but cannot justify the purchase at the current price can hedge their bets by buying Teva at the current undervalued levels and gain the growth prospects clout of both companies. Obviously, this assumes that the deal goes through between TEVA and CEPH. If the deal with Teva and Cephalon doesn’t go through, we still believe that Teva represents a solid value at the current price. 

 

Please revisit New Low Observer for edits and revisions to this post. Email us.

Sell Cephalon (CEPH) at the Market

Our premise that exceptional values starts with quality companies trading near a 52-week low has been proven again. Just like our calls on Beckman Coulter (BEC), Wesco Financial (WSC), Genzyme (GENZ) and many others, our articles on Cephalon (CEPH) have shown that quality cannot be ignored.
In a series of articles starting in August of 2009, we recommended considering the purchase of CEPH at $56.61. Subsequently, in March 2010, we recommended selling CEPH at around the $71 price range, which was two dollars short of the high at $73. Finally, on February 11, 2011, we recommended that followers of this site reconsider CEPH at $58.99. Soon after our recommendation, CEPH declined to the most recent low of $57. A month and a half later, Cephalon (CEPH) is getting a hostile bid from Valeant Pharmaceuticals (VRX) for approximately $73 a share.
Although our cursory examination of the offer by VRX seems generous, we believe that CEPH probably should, and could, be worth closer to $115 rather than $73. Regardless of this concern, we believe that 23% in 46 days affords us the opportunity to recommend selling the stock at the current price. There are too many opportunities on our Nasdaq 100 and Dividend Watch Lists. Based on our last recommendation, the annualized return on this position would be close to 200% in a tax-deferred account.
Please revisit New Low Observer for edits and revisions to this post. Email us.

Nasdaq 100 Watch List

Below are the Nasdaq 100 companies that are within 20% of the 52-week low. This list is strictly for the purpose of researching whether or not the companies have viable business models. Although theses companies are very risky, they provide significant opportunity to outperform the market in the coming year.
Symbol Name Price P/E EPS Yield P/B % from Low
CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. $18.85 14.26 $1.32 0 2.26 1.56%
AMGN Amgen Inc. $52.24 10.91 $4.79 0 2.04 3.94%
CEPH Cephalon, Inc. $58.63 11.13 $5.27 0 1.68 6.60%
TEVA Teva Pharma. $51.89 14.16 $3.66 1.70% 2.13 10.43%
ATVI Activision Blizzard, Inc $11.07 33.55 $0.33 1.50% 1.3 10.81%
CELG Celgene Corp. $53.47 28.44 $1.88 0 4.79 11.35%
EXPE Expedia, Inc. $20.96 14.36 $1.46 1.30% 2.15 14.54%
MSFT Microsoft Corp. $27.06 11.55 $2.34 2.40% 4.72 19.05%
MICC Millicom Intl. Cellular $90.27 5.92 $15.24 2.60% 3.06 19.86%

Watch List Performance Review

In our ongoing review of the Nasdaq 100 Watch List, we have taken the stocks from our list of February 21, 2010 (article here) and have checked their performance one year later. The companies on that list are provided below with the closing price for February 19, 2010 and February 18, 2011. 
Four of the companies on our list managed to exceed the Nasdaq 100 while the other four on the list underperformed the index.  Stericycle (SRCL) was the biggest winner with a 60.92% gain.  Gilead Sciences (GILD) was the biggest loser over the last year with a decline of -19.53%.
Symbol Name 2010 2011 Change
APOL Apollo Group $56.92 $45.82 -19.50%
ERTS Electronic Arts $16.75 $19.28 15.10%
FSLR First Solar $116.00 $168.22 45.02%
ATVI Activision $10.79 $11.07 2.59%
PPDI Pharma Prod. $21.20 $27.97 31.93%
SRCL Stericycle $54.30 $87.38 60.92%
GENZ Genzyme $55.97 $75.38 34.68%
GILD Gilead $48.84 $39.30 -19.53%
Average 18.90%
NDX Nasdaq 100 1823.32 2392.47 31.22%
Please revisit New Low Observer for edits and revisions to this post. Email us.

Speculation Observation: Cephalon at $58.99

Lately, in the pharmaceutical industry, it seems that you just can’t win. The big pharma companies are being thrown under the bus because of patent expirations, diminished pipelines and lawsuits. On the horizon are the firms most likely to be considered the next big pharma with a pipeline of products but also facing patent expirations and lawsuits.
In the case of Cephalon (CEPH), it couldn’t catch a break if it was handed to them. On Friday February 11, 2011, Barron’s came out with an analyst report (article here) that downgraded Cephalon from “Average” to “Below Average” with a price target of $54. Considering that Cephalon was already selling within 8.5% of the 52-week low at the time the article was published, we’re not sure if Caris & Co. meant to avoid giving a sell recommendation or not.
The problem with Cephalon, according to research firm Caris & Co., is that the late stage pipeline of products coming due may not boost revenue if sales of recently introduced Nuvigil are any indication. Combined with the fact that Provigil, which contributes 50% to Cephalon’s revenue stream, is due to face patent expiration in April of 2012 and we’ve got a recipe for disaster. Caris & Co also feels that the three pipeline drugs (Lupuzor, Cinquil and CEP-33237) hold no promise for either treatment or commercial value.  Adding to the caustic mix of diminishing sales from existing products and sub par pipeline are two court cases (Fentora and Amrix) which are likely not to go Cephalon’s way.
Not to be outdone, on February 15, 2011, a Jefferies & Co. analyst downgraded Cephalon to “Underperform” from “Buy”(article here). With the current price of CEPH going for around $58, it was shocking that the Jefferies analyst didn’t indicate that the stock should be sold considering that he (Corey Davis) has a target price of $48 instead of the previous price of $77.
If Mr. Davis feels so confident that CEPH is really worth 17% less than the current price why would it merely “underperfom” one day when only the day before it was indicated to possibly rise by 32%. With a spread of 60% in his change of opinion, it becomes challenging to believe Mr. Davis isn’t parroting the downgrade given by Caris & Co. that had such a large impact on stock price on February 11th.
Although we know how hard it is for some research and investment firms to actually say sell, the timing of these calls couldn’t be more poorly selected. Even if the stock were to accomplish the $48 level, it is too little too late. Investors needed to know that at $72 (52-week high) the stock was overpriced. Telling us that things won’t go well now is a slap in the face to some who possibly bought the stock at much higher levels. Our sell recommendation of Cephalon at $71 in early March 2010 (article here) was only rivaled by our initial speculative observation at $57 in late August 2009 (article here).
Since Cephalon is so close to the low and the negativity is running so high, we decided to run some numbers to see what the worst case scenario could be if the company were to actually survive (by the way, we think it will.)
According to Value Line dated January 14, 2011, the book value for Cephalon in 2009 was $30.19. Prior to the recession that began in 2007, Cephalon had its lowest price-to-book (P/B) ratio at 2.66 back in 2003. At that time, Cephalon had a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 23.
Currently, Cephalon is selling for 11 times earnings and if the stock price were to match the P/B of 2003 then CEPH would be selling for $80. If we assume that Cephalon can only accomplish half of the $80 target, then the stock should rise to $69 or 19% above the current level.
On a cash flow basis, Value Line estimated the cash flow for 2010 to be $8.55 per share. Based on the average low price-to-cash flow (P/CF) over the last three years, the stock should be trading at $67.29. If considered on the lowest level of the high range in the P/CF over the last three years, CEPH would be selling for $72.85. The last 3 years are utterly the lowest on a relative basis making comparisons over this period the most conservative possible.
All of the scenarios indicated above assume that Cephalon doesn’t find a way to increase their earnings going forward. Since the big name analysts are in agreement that this company is dead on arrival, we feel this company is worth a balanced second opinion. If for some reason the analysts are right about this company, then the downside target or downside risk is that the stock would fall to $51.63. However, considering the speculative nature of this selection (as with all Nasdaq 100 stocks) we prefer that CEPH occupy only a small portion of the portfolio while accepting at least 50% losses.

Article Links:

 

Please revisit New Low Observer for edits and revisions to this post. Email us.

Nasdaq 100 Watch List

Below are the top Nasdaq 100 companies that are within 20% of the 52-week low. This list is strictly for the purpose of researching whether or not the companies have viable business models. These companies are deemed highly speculative unless otherwise noted.
Symbol Name Price P/E EPS Yield P/B % from Low
ISRG Intuitive Surgical $267.40 31.8 $8.40 - 5.26 8.68%
CEPH Cephalon, Inc. $60.32 11.3 $5.35 - 1.81 9.67%
CSCO Cisco Systems $20.97 15.4 $1.36 - 2.62 10.37%
APOL Apollo Group, Inc. $37.98 10.5 $3.62 - 4.30 12.54%
AMGN Amgen Inc. $56.98 12.3 $4.63 - 2.24 13.37%
ERTS Electronic Arts $16.05 - -$0.48 - 2.04 14.17%
QGEN Qiagen N.V. $19.32 30.4 $0.64 - 1.89 14.59%
TEVA Teva Pharma. $54.01 16.6 $3.25 1.30% 2.22 14.94%
VRTX Vertex Pharma. $36.16 - -$3.73 - 11.31 15.71%
GRMN Garmin Ltd. $30.53 8.3 $3.66 4.80% 2.10 16.93%
INTC Intel Corporation $20.66 11.2 $1.85 3.00% 2.43 17.39%
GILD Gilead Sciences $37.50 11.0 $3.42 - 5.36 18.18%
SHLD Sears Holdings $70.18 41.9 $1.68 - 0.94 18.53%
^NDX Nasdaq 100 2,276.70
***Read our Chapter 2 review of Seth Klarman's book Margin of Safety here***

Watch List Summary
From the current watchlist we are considering the prospects for Intuitive Surgical (ISRG), Intel (INTC) and Garmin (GRMN).  Garmin is interesting simply for the fact that the moving feast known as their dividend should be announced in the coming months.  We're curious if Garmin will eliminate, raise, lower or keep the dividend the same.  As has been the case in the last four years, Garmin has paid their dividend all at once.  This will be very interesting considering the 4.80% payment. 
In the Nasdaq 100 Watch List of 15 companies from December 12, 2010 to the closing price January 7, 2011, the average return from all of the companies was +3.65%.  This is compared to the NDX (Nasdaq 100 Index) which had a gain of +2.77%.
Dish Network (DISH) registered the largest gain of +12.45%. Adobe Systems (ADBE) rose 11.60% since December 12th.  Cisco (CSCO) came in third on the list with a gain of 6.45%.
Watch List Performance Review
In our ongoing review of the Nasdaq 100 Watch List, we have taken the top four stocks on our list from the closing price of January 7, 2010 and have checked their performance one year later. The top four companies on that list are provided below with the closing price for January 7, 2010 and January 7, 2011.

Symbol Name 2010 2011 % change
GILD Gilead Sciences 44.54 37.50 -15.81%
CEPH Cephalon, Inc. 63.01 60.32 -4.27%
GENZ Genzyme Corp 53.81 71.39 32.67%
APOL Apollo Group 60.50 37.98 -37.22%
Average -6.16%
^NDX Nasdaq 100 1892.59 2276.70 20.30%
Only one stock, Genzyme (GENZ), was able to to show a positive return.  This was of little consolation as the three other stocks on our watchlist fell, on average, -19%.  The Nasdaq 100 outperformed the watchlist with a gain of 20% in the last year. 
Disclaimer
Stocks that appear on our watch lists are not recommendations to buy. Instead, they are the starting point for doing your research and determining the best company to buy. Ideally, a stock that is purchased from this list is done after a considerable decline in the price and extensive due diligence. We suggest that readers use the March 2009 low (or the companies' most distressed level in the last 2 years) as the downside projection for investing. Our view is to embrace the worse case scenario prior to investing. A minimum of 50% decline or the November 2008 to March 2009 low, whichever is lower, would fit that description. It is important to place these companies on your own watch list so that when the opportunity arises, you can purchase them with a greater margin of safety. It is our expectation that, at the most, only 1/3 of the companies that are part of our list will outperform the market over a one-year period.

Please revisit New Low Observer for edits and revisions to this post. Email us.

Nasdaq 100 Watch List

Watch List Summary

At the end of the week for September 17, 2010, the top performing stocks from our Nasdaq 100 list for August 15, 2010 are Oracle (ORCL) with a gain of 21.27%, Qualcomm (QCOM) with a gain of 12.07% and Computer Associates (CA) with a gain of 11.57%.
The worst performing stocks from our August 15th watch list are Intel (INTC) down –1.78%, Applied Materials (AMAT) down –1.34% and Activision (ATVI) down –0.46%.
The average gain for the watch list was 6.33%. Of the two stocks that we pointed out as being standouts from August 15th, Garmin (GRMN) exceeded the average return by climbing 9.57% while Paychex (PAYX) underperformed the average gain by rising 3.92%.
A distinction that needs to be made between this week’s list and our August 15th list is that we’ve ranking the companies on this list by those stocks nearest their 52-week low. Our previous list was ranked by those stocks that had the highest dividend yield and within 20% of their respective 52-week low.

Performance Review

The following is a total return (appreciation plus dividends) performance review of our Nasdaq 100 Watch List from September 11, 2009:
  • Stericycle (SRCL) up 44.48%
  • Genzyme (GENZ) up 25.54%
  • Pharmaceutical Product Development (PPDI) up 20%
  • Cephalon (CEPH) up 5.92%
As a group, the average gain for the stocks mentioned was 23.99%. This is contrasted by the Nasdaq 100 gain of 16.07% in the same period of time.

*chart does not reflect dividend reinvestment for PPDI


Nasdaq 100 Watch List

Below are the Nasdaq 100 companies that are within 20% of their respective 52-week lows. Stocks that appear on our watch lists are not recommendations to buy. Instead, they are the starting point for doing your research and determining the best company to buy. Ideally, a stock that is purchased from this list is done after a considerable decline in the price and rigorous due diligence.

Symbol Name Price P/E EPS Yield P/B % from Low
PAYX Paychex, Inc. 25.95 19.67 1.32 4.80% 6.67 5.27%
INTC Intel Corporation 18.81 11.26 1.67 3.40% 2.3 6.87%
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. 11.02 24.44 0.45 2.50% 2.03 7.33%
YHOO Yahoo! Inc. 13.89 22.77 0.61 N/A 1.59 7.34%
MXIM Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. 16.91 41.86 0.4 5.00% 2.15 7.91%
GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. 34.56 10.47 3.3 N/A 4.58 8.93%
ATVI Activision Blizzard, Inc 10.82 41.94 0.26 1.30% 1.21 8.96%
DELL Dell Inc. 12.45 15.74 0.79 N/A 3.92 9.80%
RIMM Research In Motion Limited 46.72 10.24 4.56 N/A 3.2 9.85%
AMGN Amgen Inc. 55.22 11.73 4.71 N/A 2.28 9.87%
DISH DISH Network Corporation 18.77 11.26 1.67 N/A N/A 10.02%
CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. 21.86 16.46 1.33 N/A 2.82 10.31%
XRAY DENTSPLY International Inc. 30.66 16.55 1.85 0.70% 2.6 10.45%
MSFT Microsoft Corporation 25.22 12 2.1 2.10% 4.76 10.95%
SPLS Staples, Inc. 19.49 17.26 1.13 1.80% 2.2 11.69%
PDCO Patterson Companies Inc. 27.15 14.67 1.85 1.50% 2.3 12.52%
SHLD Sears Holdings Corporation 66.83 27.38 2.44 N/A 0.9 12.87%
GOOG Google Inc. 490.15 21.29 23.03 N/A 3.77 13.03%
LIFE Life Technologies Corporation 46.51 29.91 1.56 N/A 1.97 13.16%
STX Seagate Technology. 11.16 3.55 3.14 N/A 1.95 13.41%
FLIR FLIR Systems, Inc. 27.24 18.52 1.47 N/A 3.25 13.50%
GRMN Garmin Ltd. 29.64 8.95 3.31 5.10% 2.21 13.52%
TEVA Teva Pharmaceutical Industries 53.48 19 2.82 1.20% 2.48 13.81%
FLEX Flextronics International Ltd. 5.55 15.72 0.35 N/A 2.26 14.20%
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation 61.29 21.93 2.8 1.30% 2.43 14.75%
HSIC Henry Schein, Inc. 56.35 15.82 3.56 N/A 2.31 14.77%
CERN Cerner Corporation 79.18 31.31 2.53 N/A 3.83 14.85%
CELG Celgene Corporation 55.25 29.99 1.84 N/A 5.11 15.06%
CA CA Inc. 20.44 13.43 1.52 0.80% 2.02 15.48%
ERTS Electronic Arts Inc. 16.26 N/A -1.06 N/A 1.96 15.63%
VRTX Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorpor 36.25 N/A -3.53 N/A 9.01 16.00%
KLAC KLA-Tencor Corporation 31.05 25.31 1.23 3.30% 2.32 16.34%
STLD Steel Dynamics, Inc. 15.01 15.73 0.95 2.00% 1.58 16.45%
WCRX Warner Chilcott plc 22.75 11.2 2.03 N/A 2.82 16.55%
LOGI Logitech International S.A. 15.39 22.57 0.68 N/A 2.68 16.86%
CEPH Cephalon, Inc. 62.26 12.48 4.99 N/A 2.09 17.36%
URBN Urban Outfitters, Inc. 34.11 22.19 1.54 N/A 4.26 18.85%
FWLT Foster Wheeler AG. 24.19 10.8 2.24 N/A 3.46 18.99%
FISV Fiserv, Inc. 53.56 17.16 3.12 N/A 2.57 19.55%
JBHT J.B. Hunt Transport Services, I 35.26 26.73 1.32 1.40% 7.56 19.73%
CTAS Cintas Corporation 27.71 19.64 1.41 1.70% 1.67 19.96%

Genzyme Corp: Value is Finally Being Recognized

There has been a lot of news about Genzyme (GENZ) being considered as a takeover candidate by Sanofi-Aventis (SNY). Typically, rumors are simply that, nothing more than prattle about a washed up company that has little or no life remaining. However, we have demonstrated that discussions of Genzyme (GENZ) being taken over are not so far fetched.
On October 17, 2009 (article link), we had only four companies that were on our Nasdaq 100 Watch List that was within 20% of their respective 52-week lows. This was in contravention to the overall market; which was racing higher every day. So compelling were the companies on the list that we felt it was necessary to give mini-profiles on their value propositions.
Genzyme (GENZ) was one such company that was on that list. We included Genzyme (GENZ) as the last company we profiled since we felt that it was “…a far superior value proposition.” This was despite the fact that Genzyme (GENZ) was the farthest from the new low among the companies on the list.
On October 30, 2009 (article link), we weren’t surprised that drug and medical device makers dominated our list of companies near a new low. In that posting to our site we said, “The continued undervaluation of these companies makes them prime targets for acquisition…” Genzyme (GENZ) was on the list and trading at $50.60. The performance of the stocks that were on the on the October 30 watch list is as follows:

The average gain for the group was 15.32% in 9 months. The worst performing stock has been Gilead Sciences (GILD) with a decline of 22.21%. The best performing stock has been Biogen (BIIB). Our sanguine view on Gilead Sciences (GILD) may be worth reviewing since it has fallen so much since October 30, 2009.
Genzyme has already indicated that they’re not going to accept the Sanofi-Aventis (SNY). This opens the door for competing bids, which should push the price up. Our view at this time is that Genzyme is strictly a speculation, at best, given the rise of nearly 33% since our mention of being a takeover candidate in October 2009.

Odds and Ends

Question:
Do you think Richard Russell has been overrated regarding his abilities to forecast the directions of the markets? It seems like one good call (1975) allows one in his position to reap benefits for years despite demonstrating no skill when one goes back and, with the benefit of hindsight, takes a critical look at the entire record.
Our Thoughts:
Anyone, including NLO team, who attempts to predict the stock market is under extraordinary pressure. The challenge that Russell presents is that he often ignores that he has a bias towards the market falling rather than rising. This becomes a problem when, against his experience and better judgment, Dow Theory might be indicating that the direction is up despite all the negative market fundamentals.
Again, Dow Theory is supposed to include all the current and foreseeable hopes and fears as it relates money. I think that if Russell would follow Dow Theory or even his PTI indicator more often he would get a more accurate readings on the market.
It should be noted that within the content of his Dow Theory Letters from 1958 to the present, there are many great calls.  As I post more reviews of Russell’s letters, I will be able to point out too many instances of where Russell was spot on.
Unfortunately, Russell often didn’t stick to his guns or he forgot his earlier good advice or information. As an example, Russell talks about the importance of compounding. This cannot be accomplished if you’re buying and selling based on Dow Theory. Another example is Russell’s commentary on values. You can’t speak of values if you’re primarily focused on ETFs, index funds or stocks that don’t increase their dividends when plenty of them exist.
The pace and excitement of the markets become challenging for anyone to remain focused on the fundamentals. Russell has fallen astray of the basic principals of Dow Theory and value investing. Although the two seem mutually incompatible, there is a middle ground which Russell hasn’t attempted to address in all the years of his work.
Question:
I'm curious that you write "In my observations, market volume has increasingly become an addendum to Dow Theory." Meaning, only as a sidelight, or as an increasingly important variable? It does seem harder to judge given increased manipulation on light volume. Looks like lots of stick saves last week.
Answer:
It may be a function of the markets being driven by various large institutions (mutual funds, hedge funds, index funds, ETFs etc...) but volume seems to be less reliable when trying to determine sentiment and trends on the NYSE. I suspect that the diminished impact of smaller participants and derivative markets have had a lot to do with my concerns about volume not being a strong indicator. However, I will continue track volume just in case.
Question:
What did you do with the proceeds from the sale of WTR?
Answer:
After investing in WTR we recommended CEPH and SVU which generated 13% and 11% gains respectively. Both stocks were on our Watch Lists and in each case we accomplished our targets and made subsequent sell recommendations. In addition to our posted recommendations, we also participated in CWT and GENZ. Both positions accomplished our short-term after tax goals which allowed for the purchases of new stocks on our dividend Watch List.
Our article titled “Meridian Biosciences and Other Profitable Market Lessons” provides a framework for the strategy we’d like to employ when investing in Dividend Achievers. Another article that weighs heavily on our investment decisions is titled “It Isn’t Easy Being Green.” That article outlined Hetty Green’s approach to handling her funds when not invested in stocks. We’ve simply applied a similar strategy to Dividend Achievers and Nasdaq 100 stocks at a new low (after careful analysis).
Question:
Would you venture to provide a top pick from your current dividend achievers list?
Answer:
As you can tell, the current list has too many companies that are candidates for investment. Without providing any detailed analysis,  I would say that my top four choices for additional research would be Ritchie Bros Auctioneers (RBA), Northern Trust (NTRS), Dentsply (XRAY), and Meridian Biosciences (VIVO).  We expect, and hope, that the price of these stocks will fall further while we get more research in.  We're using the March 2009 low as our benchmark for all investment analysis going forward and we hope that you do the same.
Russell Blurb:
For what it is worth Richard Russell’s commentary today (July 12, 2010) seems to fly in the face of the commentary that he gave on Friday July 9, 2010. Go figure:

“The recent non-confirmation by the Transports may have served as an entry spot for bold speculators, but I doubt if the 2007 highs in the Averages will be approached or bettered. Nevertheless, we may see a brief period of better markets, a "breather" in the long life of the bear. I believe this primary bear market will extend into 2016.

A near-term marker or target is to see whether the Dow and the Transports can better their recent June highs. Those highs were 10450.64 for Industrials and 4467.25 for Transports. Write those figures down. I'm betting that the two D-J Averages will not be able to better the June highs. Let's wait and see.”

All I can say is, at least he indicated an upside target that matches the one we came up with yesterday.  Can't understand how he was so bullish on Friday and is now sounding so skeptical today.

Email our team here.

Gaining More by Limiting Our Gains

One of the biggest challenges to buying and holding a stock for the long term is the wait through thick and thin for the expectations of a particular stock to materialize. In a process of elimination, the New Low Observer team has narrowed down the steps to determining quality stocks by relegating it to those that have increased their dividend every year for at least 10 years in a row. Furthermore, we only seek out those high quality dividend paying stocks, as well as Nasdaq 100 index constituents, when the companies are within 20% of the 1-year low. Having these requirements allows us to select quality companies at (potentially) ideal times to invest.
However, once we have decided on the company that we're interested in investing and we've committed money to, we are still at the whims of "Mr. Market." Although it might seem surprising to some, we are incredibly risk averse and always try to avoid losses whenever we can. We are so risk averse that we have a general rule that if the investment in a particular stock exceeds the gains of the market over the last 100, 50, 25, or 10 years on an annual basis (after expenses) then we tend to sell that stock to seek alternative investment opportunities. If nothing else, we secure the exceptional gains and bide our time until the next "undervalued" opportunity arrives.While the buy-and-hold crowd cries foul at the thought that we're speculating rather than investing when buying and selling high quality stocks at arguably undervalued prices, we have noticed a pattern that keeps emerging from our strategy that sets apart our approach from merely speculating. One of the best recent examples of the value in our investment philosophy is the case of Meridian Biosciences (VIVO).
On March 17, 2010, as the Dow Industrials and Dow Transportation Average were confirming the Dow Theory trend to the upside, Meridian Biosciences (VIVO) was dropping like a rock on news that the future earnings would have to be revised lower. In one fell swoop, Meridian Biosciences (VIVO) erased 9 months of hard earned gains in the stock price. I say 9 months because after our recommendation to sell VIVO, the stock increased in value an additional 27% in 3 months at the peak in September 2009.
At the time of our sell recommendation, Meridian Biosciences had risen 11.75% from our Research Recommendation on March 26, 2009. We were content in our gains and smug at being so smart at selling while the going was good. However, we watched, in almost horror, as the stock continued to climb higher going from our sell point of $20.35 all the way up to $26. We began to wonder if selling a company that we were convinced was of the highest quality was the best choice. After all, Meridian Biosciences (VIVO) is one of the only Dividend Achievers to match the gains of Google (GOOG) on a percentage basis from the date of Google's (GOOG) IPO to the peak in late 2007/early 2008.
With a tinge of regret we moved on hoping that our next investment would make up for our blunder of selling VIVO at such a cheap price. In the nine months since our sell recommendation of Meridian Biosciences (VIVO) we've made eight Investment Observations that were followed by Sell Recommendations. Below are the stocks we mentioned and the percentage gains that were secured since our sell recommendation of VIVO on June 12, 2009:
  • Cardinal Health (CAH) +23%
  • Abbott Labs (ABT) +16.80%
  • SuperValu (SVU) +11.87%
  • Nor'wst Nat (NWN) +10.53%
  • AquaAmer. (WTR) +10%
  • Cephalon (CEPH) +13.41%
  • Mattson (MTSN) +24%
  • Monsanto (MON) +22%
With the reduction of earnings estimates and the subsequent collapse of Meridian Biosciences (VIVO), the stock has fallen below the level of the original sell recommendation that was given on June 12, 2009. In addition, we've highlighted eight companies that have provided double digit returns in a complete buy and sell cycle all within a nine month period. The chart below illustrates the recommendation dates in green and the sell dates in red with the post-collapse price in yellow.
Today the New Low Observer team breathes a sigh of relief, not in the lose that has afflicted current Meridian Biosciences shareholders but based on the fact that we stayed the course with our investment philosophy which provided gains that, to this point, have gone beyond our expectations by actually limiting how much we are willing to accept on the upside.The lesson that should be learned about Meridian Biosciences is that although the price is nearly the same as a year ago doesn't mean that there was no movement or activity. In fact, the stock went up as much as 44% in 5 months. This is the hard lesson that most buy-and-hold investors should have learned about where the major indexes have gone over the last 10 years. Within all the drama that occured since 2000, many opportunies presented themselves but may have never been realized if holding for the long-term was the only investment strategy. For most investors, the real challenge becomes whether or not to sell a stock after exceptional gains.
Our Current Take on Meridian Biosciences
In our sell recommendation of Meridian Biosciences at the $20.35 level, we said that VIVO would easily go to the $23.33. Since the peak in the price at $26.20 in September 2009 and the recent decline to $19.60, Dow Theory indicates that for this stock, the upside move should take the price at least to the $23 level before going back to the old high of $26.20 or back down to the $19 range. Our expectation that a reaction of 11% to 13% upside move would not be unusual.For those who are interested in justifications of Meridian Biosciences (VIVO) as an investment candidate (since the negative news is already out), there are several compelling factors to watch for.
First and foremost is the recent confirmation of the bullish move of the stock market according to Dow’s Theory. This gives the investor that chance to make mistakes without paying a hefty price. More specific to Meridian Biosciences (VIVO) is the fact that the company is selling 16% below the 8-year average price-to-earnings ratio according to Morningstar.com. VIVO is also selling 3% below the average price-to-cash flow ratio over the last 10 years. Bolstering the case for VIVO is the fact that the company carries little or no debt. We will be watching Meridian Biosciences (VIVO) closely for any indication that the stock will decline from the current level. Our hope, as it always is, is to buy the stock at a much lower price and take reasonable gains in the shortest period of time possible. It is our hope that others can see the value of our approach of taking gains that exceed the historical average annual return and seeking alternative investment opportunities whether it is in cash or another quality stock that is at or near a new low.
  • Don't know the historical average annual gains for 100, 50 or 10 years. Go to Moneychimp.com's CAGR of the Stock Market Calculator. Pick just about any time frame and see what you've been missing (even on an inflation adjusted basis).
  • Want more info about the strategy mentioned above, then go to our article title "When Timing Meets Opportunity" on SeekingAlpha.com. The article was posted in July of 2009 and has more relevancy than ever before.
  • Our article titled "Seeking Fair Profits" outlines Charles H. Dow's philosophy of fair expectations when investing in the stock market. Charles Dow was the co-founder of the Wall Street Journal and the Dow Jones Indexes.
Tell a friend about us. Thank you.

Sell Cephalon (CEPH) at the Market

It is now time to recommend that Cephalon (CEPH) be sold at the market. The stock has performed moderately since the Speculative Observation was issued on January 4, 2010. However, CEPH has performed well since our Speculative Observation of August 27th and October 8th of 2009. Since our original Observations, CEPH has provided many opportunities to buy the stock low with the better than even prospect of selling high.
Since our October 8th reiteration of CEPH, the stock has risen 31% to the current market price of $70.78. However, if we go by the last observation on January 4, 2010, CEPH has increased 13.41%. In the pursuit of "seeking fair profits" the returns that CEPH has provided within the last 61 days say that it is necessary to consider alternative opportunities. The key to investment success and a key principle of economics is to seek the best alternatives.
CEPH was re-recommended when it closed at $62.42 on January 4, 2010. As of March 2, 2010, CEPH was quoted at $70.78. Again, CEPH has gained 13.41% since the beginning of the year. The annualized return on this position would be close to 80%. Since it is unlikely that the stock can continue to climb unabated, we feel selling now is a reasonable policy.
Those not interested in following through with our sell recommendation can feel comfortable knowing that CEPH is a great long-term holding with a 13.41% downside cushion since our last investment observation. As the price of CEPH rises, it should be noted that the stock faces significant upside resistance at $70 and $80. We are going to continue watching this company to determine if the stock will meet our prior 3 month targets based on the Coppock Curve and other technical indicators.
As we have indicated in the purposes and function of this site, our goal is to:
  • maximize the annual yield of each trade.
  • reduce time between buying and selling of each stock.
  • exceed the annual yield of government guaranteed alternatives in each trade.
Investment observations are intended to be a starting point for investigating a quality company at a reasonable price. It is hoped that after doing the background research you can buy the stock at a lower price. Ideally the stock should be held in a tax deferred account and should not consist of less than 20% of your holdings. Personally, we prefer holding only 2-3 stocks at a time.
Sell recommendations are intended to deal with the short term reality of the market. The tracking of the Sell recommendations are the worst case scenario if you happen to have bought a stock at the time the Speculative Observation was made (please avoid making this mistake.) We aim for mediocrity in our returns, therefore we are happy with 9-12% annual gains. However, since codifying this approach to investing in 2005, we have had annual returns of 20% and above every year since.
It is always recommended that when selling a stock, one should not place stop orders, limit orders or orders after hours. This leaves the seller in the position of being vulnerable to the whims of the market makers. Instead, place your sell orders only as a market order during market hours. Some would complain that a market order during market hours might leave some profits on the table. However, we would rather leave some money on the table rather than have it taken away from us by the trades that are placed by institutions and market makers.
-Touc

Nasdaq 100 Watch List

Below are the Nasdaq 100 companies that are within 20% of the 52-week low. This list is strictly for the purpose of researching whether or not the companies have viable business models or are about to go out of business. These companies are deemed highly speculative unless otherwise noted. -Touc
Symbol Name Trade P/E EPS Yield P/B Pct from Yr Low
GILD Gilead Sciences 44.54 17.22 2.59 N/A 7.17 9.65%
CEPH Cephalon, Inc. 63.01 17.42 3.62 N/A 2.21 19.90%
GENZ Genzyme Corp 53.81 30.68 1.75 N/A 1.78 14.27%
APOL Apollo Group 60.50 16.13 3.75 N/A 8.55 14.61%

Speculative Observation: Cephalon Inc. (CEPH) at $62.42

The new year brings new challenges and opportunities. The first opportunity for this year may come from Cephalon (CEPH) which engages in the discovery, development, and commercialization of products for central nervous system, inflammatory disease, pain, and oncology therapeutic areas. It competes against GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), and Sepracor Inc. Because the company doesn't pay a dividend, the New Low Observer team has to classify such a security as a speculation.

CEPH came onto our radar when we began compiling the new low data back in July when the stock was trading around $57. This was 8% above the 52 week low of $52.55. At the low, CEPH was trading at less than 15 times earnings. Although appearing to be risky, selected stocks at or near their low offer investors the opportunity to investigate quality companies for potential price increases. Our concept is laid out in the "Buy Low, Sell High" article.

CEPH has a market cap of $4.6 billion dollar. The relatively small size compared to its rivals doesn't discourage us. We only care about the market cap as a means for liquidity when buying and selling the stock. CEPH earned $3.62 per share over the last 12 months and thus has a price to earnings ratio (P/E) of 17 and a forward P/E of 10, an extraordinarily low multiple. Low P/E multiples imply that investors are paying less for every dollar of earnings (more on our view of P/E). CEPH has a book value of $28.71 per share. At $62, price-to-book is north of 2. A positive operating cash flow of $232.48M is a plus but a negative free cash flow is one of my concern ($-12.71M).

Fundamentals aside, the stock may have discounted all the negative news based on the chart pattern. In 2009, Cephalon dropped 19% as opposed to the Dow Industrials which rose 19%. Unlike the Dow which hit the yearly low in March, Cephalon bottomed in July and formed what appears to be a base. This pattern is prominent because it shows that the stock failed to move either up or down and traded in range between $60 and $53. Any break above $60 or below $53 will reveal its potential direction of the stock. Sure enough, the stock broke above $60 in late December and will look for that to be a support for the stock. The momentum indication also turned bullish as the 50-day moving average crossed the upward sloping 150-day moving average as indicated in the chart below.

Another indicator I like to refer to is the Coppock Curve (click here for more on the Coppock Curve). For Cephalon, the curve dates back to 1993. The table below shows my findings.

Date Price 3 Mo After % Change
May-95 9.81 24.25 147%
Feb-98 12.00 10.63 -11%
Sep-98 7.31 9.00 23%
Mar-99 8.75 17.38 99%
May-03 45.16 44.35 -2%
Sep-05 46.42 64.74 39%
Aug-08 76.62 73.48 -4%

The average percentage gain if you sell three months after the buy indication is 42%. Excluding the 1995 data, it is 24%. We are waiting for the indicator to turn for a possible buy signal.

A buy strategy would be to purchase this stock as close as possible to $60 or the 50 day moving average which is dynamic and constantly changing. Use the Coppock indicator as another gauge to buy and watch your gains or losses closely. - Art

Nasdaq 100 Watch List

Below are the Nasdaq 100 companies that are within 20% of the 52-week low. This list is strictly for the purpose of researching whether or not the companies have viable business models or are about to go out of business. These companies are deemed highly speculative unless otherwise noted. -Touc

Symbol Name Trade P/E EPS (ttm) Yield P/B Pct from Yr Low

GENZ

Genzyme

49.01

27.94

1.75

N/A

1.73

4.08%

GILD

Gilead

43.27

16.73

2.59

N/A

7.00

6.52%

APOL

Apollo

60.58

16.15

3.75

N/A

8.18

14.76%

CEPH

Cephalon

62.42

17.25

3.62

N/A

2.19

18.78%

Nasdaq 100 Watch List

Below are the Nasdaq 100 companies that are within 20% of the 52-week low. This list is strictly for the purpose of researching whether or not the companies have viable business models or are about to go out of business. These companies are deemed highly speculative unless otherwise noted. -Touc

Symbol

Name Trade P/E EPS (ttm) Yield P/B % Yr Low

GENZ

Genzyme Corporation

48.50

27.65

1.75

N/A

1.68

2.99%

GILD

Gilead Sciences, Inc.

43.00

16.63

2.59

N/A

6.87

5.86%

APOL

Apollo Group, Inc.

59.27

15.80

3.75

N/A

7.81

12.28%

CEPH

Cephalon, Inc.

59.88

16.55

3.62

N/A

2.08

13.95%